Petraeus and Bhengazi

The British pulled their ambassador and people and so did the Red Cross.....plus, the embassy had been attacked twice previously.....I should have labelled you the BIG DUMB GAY.....I can even smell your rancid ignorance through the computer...you're disgusting..... Originally Posted by ChoomCzar

Choomey my little bitch the only thing you can smell is the shit you call facts;;;
NiceGuy53's Avatar
Choomey my little bitch the only thing you can smell is the shit you call facts;;; Originally Posted by ekim008
His facts are correct. Both the British and the Red Cross pulled out after they were attacked. And our facilities in Libya had been previously attacked. Where do you get your "facts" Ekim?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Where do you get yours TONY HOMO?

Reagan cut and run after the Lebanon attack.

Don't be such a dipshit!
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-15-2012, 12:44 PM
with several MASSIVE attacks on the consulate before Stevens went to visit, and holding the knowledge there would be no extra security for the 7 americans while they were at the compound, the decision to leave Tripoli and venture to Bengazi is resting at the whitehouse doorstep?


yeah, ok ... that makes perfect sense to idiots.

The End.
NiceGuy53's Avatar
Let me put it this way if you know there is a likelihood of someone shooting at you and you go traveling who's fault is it ? I know it is Obama's fault... Originally Posted by ekim008

So if you think there is a likelihood of someone shooting at you, you should just turn tail and run? Americans serving their country in harm's way, do not do this. They ask for backup, more troops, more security but they do not shirk their duties and go hide somewhere.
NiceGuy53's Avatar
with several MASSIVE attacks on the consulate before Stevens went to visit, and holding the knowledge there would be no extra security for the 7 americans while they were at the compound, the decision to leave Tripoli and venture to Bengazi is resting at the whitehouse doorstep?


yeah, ok ... that makes perfect sense to idiots.

The End. Originally Posted by CJ7
You still don't get it, do you CBJ7. It is the Obama administration's responsibility to provide adequate security for our embassy facilities. And in the light of the previous attacks, it is inexcuseable that they did not.
markroxny's Avatar
You still don't get it, do you CBJ7. It is the Obama administration's responsibility to provide adequate security for our embassy facilities. And in the light of the previous attacks, it is inexcuseable that they did not. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
Adequate security can not be provided without the proper funding NG. Security ain't free.

LexusLover's Avatar
... they were too busy to stop the ragheads from entering the compound and killing 4 americans ??? Originally Posted by CJ7
Yes ...
NiceGuy53's Avatar
Where do you get yours TONY HOMO?

Reagan cut and run after the Lebanon attack.

Don't be such a dipshit! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
No, you got the DIPSHIT angle on this board covered well. Mr. DIPSHIT OF THE YEAR Award Winner.
So if you think there is a likelihood of someone shooting at you, you should just turn tail and run? Americans serving their country in harm's way, do not do this. They ask for backup, more troops, more security but they do not shirk their duties and go hide somewhere. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
Run ??? who said run? you are just a spin doctor...
NiceGuy53's Avatar
Adequate security can not be provided without the proper funding NG. Security ain't free.

Originally Posted by markroxny



This bullshit argument has already been debunked numerous times on this board.
LexusLover's Avatar

This bullshit argument has already been debunked numerous times on this board. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
That's one of the flaws of the "intellectual liberals" ....

.. they actually believe others are dumber than they are .... and

have extremely short terms memories.

Or is that THEY have extremely short term memories?

Like the new argument that it is Stevens' own fault he is dead, because he knew there was gonna be an attack that would end up killing him ....

.. and how "he" knew that, but Obaminable did NOT!
markroxny's Avatar

This bullshit argument has already been debunked numerous times on this board. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
So in these numerous times, was it concluded that adequate funding was available?
How the heck do you come up with that? It's just bizarre and flies in the face of every fact that we know.

1. He has personalized "hit lists" where he chooses the next terrorist to get a drone missile up his ass.

2. He upped the ante in Afghanistan with the surge.

3. He authorized US forces to enter Pakistan without permission, a sovereign entity and an ally, to kill Osama Bin Laden.

The list goes on and on......you just look stupid when you parrot what Rush Limbaugh and the rest of the conservative entertainment industry feeds you, instead of objectively assessing what we all know to be are facts. Facts, not political spin desiged to gain an advantage for the GOP. Originally Posted by timpage
All three items you list above are against what Odumbo said he would do when he first ran for President. He was supposed to be a peace loving president. He even received the Nobel Peace Prize for what the Nobel committee "expected" of him. Isn't that one of the reasons people voted for him the first time? You would think they would know better than to trust him but the kool aid is too good.
CJ7's Avatar
  • CJ7
  • 11-15-2012, 01:17 PM
You still don't get it, do you CBJ7. It is the Obama administration's responsibility to provide adequate security for our embassy facilities. And in the light of the previous attacks, it is inexcuseable that they did not. Originally Posted by NiceGuy53
see, you keep reminding everyone of the danger present at Bengazi, and who had been attacked AND pulled up stakes and left the region ... yet Stevens decided to go visit anyway ... under whos orders? and why? Did the WH give him specific orders? The State Dept? The CIA? The Pentagon?

supposedly ...

Between 125 and 150 gunmen, "some wearing the Afghan-style tunics favored by Islamic militants," are reported to have participated in the assault. Some had their faces covered and wore flak jackets. Weapons they used during the attack included rocket-propelled grenades, hand grenades, AK-47 and FN F2000 NATO assault rifles, diesel canisters, mortars, and heavy machine guns and artillery mounted on gun trucks
The assault began at nightfall, with the attackers sealing off streets leading to the main compound with gun trucks. The trucks bore the logo of Ansar al-Shariah, a group of Islamist militants working with the local government to manage security in Benghazi.


exactly WHAT type of security would it have taken to stop an assault of that nature ? Did Bengazi warrant that type of security 24/7 365? or do we simply detach a large security team everytime the ambassador decided to venture away from the Embassy and make a visit to the consulate?

I get it alright ... the rightwingers are operating on talking points and are too stupid to take the entire picture into full light .. so what else is new.