BTW, those charges against Zimmerman were dropped. Originally Posted by I B HankeringThat tends to happen when your father is a retired state supreme court judge.
So perhaps you can explain why people keep wanting to beat him up.
That tends to happen when your father is a retired state supreme court judge.Martin's justification, according to Rachel Jeantel, was that he thought Zimmerman was a "creepy ass cr@cker".
So perhaps you can explain why people keep wanting to beat him up. Originally Posted by Doove
I'd like to see the your citation where Zim's father is a retired State Supreme Court judge. He's a retired magistrate from Va. I'm not seeing "State Supreme Court." Originally Posted by gnadflyOk, so he's a retired Magistrate Judge for the Supreme Court of Virginia. At least according to Zimmerman himself. Talk about a nit-pick. My point stands.
And what did Zimmerman think Martin was?"A real suspicious guy" casing houses for a burglary by trespassing onto neighbors' lawns peering into windows on a dark, cold, rainy winter's night. Oh, and he might be "on drugs or sumpin." Based on the contraband previously found on Martin's person and in pictures discovered on his phone, Zimmerman probably surmised correctly.
Please answer. Originally Posted by Doove
"A real suspicious guy" casing houses for a burglary by trespassing onto neighbors' lawns peering into windows on a dark, cold, rainy winter's night. Oh, and he might be "on drugs or sumpin." Based on the contraband previously found on Martin's person and in pictures discovered on his phone, Zimmerman probably surmised correctly. Originally Posted by I B HankeringSince you seem so big on proof, where's the proof that he was trespassing onto neighbor's lawns and peering into windows on a cold, rainy night?
"A real suspicious guy" Originally Posted by I B HankeringOh, and you forgot "asshole" and "fucking punk".
Since you seem so big on proof, where's the proof that he was trespassing onto neighbor's lawns and peering into windows on a cold, rainy night?The answer you seek is in Zimmerman's statement and justification for the nonemergency call he made prior to the altercation, and it was a cold, rainy winter's night. Evidently you, Doofus, weren't paying attention when the evidence was introduced or when Detectives Singelton and Serino stated that he believed Zimmerman was telling the truth.
And when you get done answering that, you can finally answer my original question. Why do people seem to wanna beat up George Zimmerman all the time? Originally Posted by Doove
Oh, and you forgot "asshole" and "fucking punk".You're ignorantly wrong, Doofus. It wasn't Martin's neighborhood, Doofus, and Martin's behavior suggested he was casing houses. Plus, Doofus, once again you are hypocritically ignoring Martin's racial epithets and that it was Martin who confronted Zimmerman and not vice versa.
So if Martin would want to beat up a "creepy ass cracker" for being a "creepy ass cracker", why wouldn't Zimmerman wanna beat up an "asshole" or a "fucking punk" for being an "asshole" and a "fucking punk"?
And for what it's worth, if i was walking around my neighborhood, minding my own business, and some guy was following me in his car (just imagine that scenario for a second, you'll get what it truly means), i'd think he was pretty freakin' creepy too. And so would you. Originally Posted by Doove
The answer you seek is in Zimmerman's statement and justification for the nonemergency call he made prior to the altercation, and it was a cold, rainy winter's night. Evidently you, Doofus, weren't paying attention when the evidence was introduced or when Detectives Singelton and Serino stated that he believed Zimmerman was telling the truth.So what you're saying is, you can't answer any of the questions that leave doubt as to whether Zimmerman is telling the truth.
BTW, your question is as irrelevant as your personal experiences (or, more to the point, lack thereof), and you haven't explained why poor, lil Trayvon Martin's suspension for fighting in the immediate, preceding days shouldn't carry more weight in this matter than your ignorant focus on a seven year old case (now eight years old) where the charges were dismissed, Doofus.
You're ignorantly wrong, Doofus. It wasn't Martin's neighborhood, Doofus, and Martin's behavior suggested he was casing houses. Plus, Doofus, once again you are hypocritically ignoring Martin's racial epithets and that it was Martin who confronted Zimmerman and not vice versa.
Your punk-ass claims you've never been in a fight as adult, yet you insinuate you would have behaved as Martin did and attacked Zimmerman for following and observing!?!
You're a liar, Doofus!
Your punk-ass would have done what Martin should have done, and that means you'd have gone safely inside when you had the opportunity.
Instead, Martin turned around, back tracked to where Zimmerman was at the "T" and attacked him. And Martin was shot for being a "gangsta-wanna-be". Originally Posted by I B Hankering
Thanks for leaving out the part about all jurors thought Z had gone too far. Plus twitter shutting down her big plans for a book deal. Originally Posted by i'va biggenIt’s not an issue of the jurors opinions of a situation, more so the matter of the law. Under Florida’s stand your ground law he is unequivocally innocent being the way the case was proven.