Amazing juror interview with Anderson Cooper.

Misinformation about people is harmful to those about whom it is written and nonproductive in any meaningful discourse. Originally Posted by LexusLover

No shit, sherlock. Why do you think people like CJ7, Randy4candy, Iva Biggen, and WTF, et al even exist on this board?

Self awareness is clearly not a strong suit of yours.

Don't you get a little weary of internet bullshit that is spewed out there about people as being truth and then the response to the challenge is: "refute what I wrote"?

It seems to be that if you are going to speak factually about something regarding someone else that the prudent and appropriate thing to do is have readily available a "reliable source" of information to support the factual statement ....

And just to clarify, I'm not talking about your "opinion" of someone. I'm talking about FACTS.

Misinformation about people is harmful to those about whom it is written and nonproductive in any meaningful discourse. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Most people will willingly believe anything they find on the internet if it confirms their belief system. Especially if they are Republicans or Democrats.

No shit, sherlock. Why do you think people like CJ7, Randy4candy, Iva Biggen, and WTF, et al even exist on this board? Originally Posted by Doove

Because this is the only forum in which they can actually "exist" ... along with you.

Your "assessment" of me proves my point as to your "awareness" of your surroundings.

Most people will willingly believe anything they find on the internet if it confirms their belief system. Especially if they are Republicans or Democrats. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

If that makes you feel justified in accepting bullshit .. so be it.

But first ... "most people" don't "blog" on the internet about bullshit like is posted in here.

And your post (quoted above) actually proves my point ....


... post the link from which you got the announced "FACT" ... that ...

"Most people will willingly believe anything they find on the internet if it confirms their belief system."

There you go "Doove" ... help your mentor out.

If that makes you feel justified in accepting bullshit .. so be it.

But first ... "most people" don't "blog" on the internet about bullshit like is posted in here.

And your post (quoted above) actually proves my point ....


... post the link from which you got the announced "FACT" ... that ...

"Most people will willingly believe anything they find on the internet if it confirms their belief system."

There you go "Doove" ... help your mentor out. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You have the comprehension skills of a turnip. Just a child playing on a hooker board. When will you leave the parents basement?

Your "assessment" of me proves my point as to your "awareness" of your surroundings. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Just how many of these "i know you are, but what am i?" comebacks of yours am i going to have to deal with today?

Maybe, but it's wrong.

Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Something is not factual here on eccie? Shirley you jest!

Something is not factual here on eccie? Shirley you jest!


Originally Posted by WTF

It was his fiancée. Restraining orders are really fairly common in failed relationships; hence, unremarkable.

It was his fiancée. Restraining orders are really fairly common in failed relationships; hence, unremarkable. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

And the fiancee got the restraining order first, against him.

Wonder why that was.

And the fiancee got the restraining order first, against him.

Wonder why that was. Originally Posted by Doove

The court granted mutual retraining orders in a failed relationship, Doofus: completely unremarkable!

It was his fiancée. Restraining orders are really fairly common in failed relationships; hence, unremarkable. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

IB'S catfish name is Shirley? Wow I didn't see that coming.

The court granted mutual retraining orders in a failed relationship, Doofus: completely unremarkable!
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Who applied first? And then who tried to blame the other person by following up with their own?

Who applied first? And then who tried to blame the other person by following up with their own? Originally Posted by Doove

Poor, little Doofy. Doofus, you need to go upstairs and ask your mommy whether your birth was a result of her failing to apply a BCD, or whether it was your daddy's fault for not applying a condom.

Who applied first? And then who tried to blame the other person by following up with their own? Originally Posted by Doove

It's standard text written to a divorce petition. I never asked for a restraining order, yet my lawyer wrote it into my petition and the judge granted it. Besides, i'm not a lawyer and I've never been in that position, but I think a restraining order is different than a protective order.

Who applied first? And then who tried to blame the other person by following up with their own? Originally Posted by Doove

Any body can apply for a restraining order ... first or second ... just like anybody can accuse someone of murder ... 2nd or 1st degree.