Y no black men??

I think its just a woman's preference I guess....sort of like us guys have our preferences on here. There are certain women we will pay time for due to pictures and if we do not like what we see then we don't see her....don't hear those women writing posts asking why we don't spend on them. They just accept and move on....I do same when some white girls reject me....and I am half white and Spanish! maybe its the military that drives them away! I don't know...but good luck my brother and happy hunting. haha

I believe its mostly the younger age group for black men us girls dont like to see!!! From my experience its like a person stereotypes a black women for having a bad attitude, for some reason in the sex business black men does too... With black men it was more about how much he can get for as little as possible... and not the expirence of both parties enjoying each other..Just some of my dealings with my urban gentlemen!!! I have some regular black clients and they are wonderful with me and in bed, especially the love makers uhhhhhhh ...

I think its just a woman's preference I guess....sort of like us guys have our preferences on here. There are certain women we will pay time for due to pictures and if we do not like what we see then we don't see her....don't hear those women writing posts asking why we don't spend on them. They just accept and move on....I do same when some white girls reject me....and I am half white and Spanish! maybe its the military that drives them away! I don't know...but good luck my brother and happy hunting. haha Originally Posted by spank_my_monkey76

Im a army brat i love Military men fyi

They don't see black men for the same reason a lot women don't see men under 40. PREFERANCE. If it's OK for a provider to judge one group of men on here, then it damn sure as hell should be OK for her to judge another. Quite frankly it's nobody's damn business why a woman chooses not to fuck black men, or young men or whatever. If she has an NBA policy that's her right, deal with it and go see a provider who will see one and stop worrying about what other people are doing. The NBA rule isn't going anywhere so as long as you hobby, you might as well learn to live with it. Originally Posted by Little Monster

I agree with a providers right to discriminate but this logic is flawed this is the same logic used by people who promoted segregated bathrooms, schools, water fountains, and white only restaurants.

I agree with a providers right to discriminate but this logic is flawed this is the same logic used by people who promoted segregated bathrooms, schools, water fountains, and white only restaurants. Originally Posted by hookem420

Or genectically female only ad areas.

Or genectically female only ad areas. Originally Posted by junkweed

Which is why that is not the logic I used.

Which is why that is not the logic I used. Originally Posted by hookem420

I dunno, seems like articulating your argument is somewhat of a stumblimg block here. What is the difference?

You want to segragate a certain population, but that's ok because it kills your boner. hhmmm...if transexuals were defined as a race would you feel the same way?

You could have an NTA policy.

I thought it was all pink on the inside anyway.

Are you going to make one of those "born this way" arguments? Just curious. When you get down to genetic and biological markers and predsipositions combined with naturally occuring mutuations for creating not only variety but as a response to environmental pressures the sky is them limit.

we are always evolving as a species.

I dunno, seems like articulating your argument is somewhat of a stumblimg block here. What is the difference?

You want to segragate a certain population, but that's ok because it kills your boner. hhmmm...if transexuals were defined as a race would you feel the same way?

You could have an NTA policy.

I thought it was all pink on the inside anyway.

Are you going to make one of those "born this way" arguments? Just curious. When you get down to genetic and biological markers and predsipositions combined with naturally occuring mutuations for creating not only variety but as a response to environmental pressures the sky is them limit.

we are always evolving as a species. Originally Posted by junkweed

I disagree I feel like it is ironic that girls in this thread are defending their right to discriminate yet in my thread everyone is the same and we all come here for fun and to relax so I need to back off. I think it's hilarious.

And it's not all pink on the inside some of it is brown.

I agree with a providers right to discriminate but this logic is flawed this is the same logic used by people who promoted segregated bathrooms, schools, water fountains, and white only restaurants. Originally Posted by hookem420

...says the guy who started a whole thread about how an entire goup of people should be segregated, just because you were turned on by a TS

Sorry but from what I've seen your logic is really fucked up. I stand by every word I posted, and NO my logic is not the same as wanting segregated schools, bathrooms, water fountains etc, not even close. Just because i don't feel women should be forced to sleep with men they don't want to does not make me a racist,if that's how you see it then that's your own ignorance. If you feel providers should be forced to sleep with men they don't want to then you obviously support "Sexual Slavery ". just because I agree with a provider having a preference doesn't mean I want to burn crosses in people's yard's, some of my best friends are black, when an interracial couple comes into my store they are treated no differently then anyone else. I know how to worry about what goes on in my own bedroom, YOU apparently DON'T.

...says the guy who started a whole thread about how an entire goup of people should be segregated, just because you were turned on by a TS

Sorry but from what I've seen your logic is really fucked up. I stand by every word I posted, and NO my logic is not the same as wanting segregated schools, bathrooms, water fountains etc, not even close. Just because i don't feel women should be forced to sleep with men they don't want to does not make me a racist,if that's how you see it then that's your own ignorance. If you feel providers should be forced to sleep with men they don't want to then you obviously support "Sexual Slavery ". just because I agree with a provider having a preference doesn't mean I want to burn crosses in people's yard's, some of my best friends are black, when an interracial couple comes into my store they are treated no differently then anyone else. I know how to worry about what goes on in my own bedroom, YOU apparently DON'T. Originally Posted by Little Monster

1. AS I HAVE STATED NUMEROUS TIMES I WAS NOT TURNED ON BY A TS I WAS DISGUSTED BY ONE.

2. As I clearly stated I support a providers right to discriminate. No I do not wish to impose sexual slavery [unless someone is into that and has a good safe word ] reading is fun!

3. All I said was your logic was flawed which it was. You used different logic in your second post to defend your first post. The logic in your second post was not flawed except for the fact you used it to defend the first one.

4. Don't you think it's ironic that everyone in this thread is defending a providers right to discriminate however in my thread we are all the same and we all come here for fun and to relax and I am being a hateful person for saying I don't want to be tricked into looking at pictures of transsexuals?

I disagree I feel like it is ironic that girls in this thread are defending their right to discriminate yet in my thread everyone is the same and we all come here for fun and to relax so I need to back off. I think it's hilarious.

And it's not all pink on the inside some of it is brown. Originally Posted by hookem420

I think defining rights, preferences, and privilege are all at issue.

You have the right to be a racist, bigot, or whatever. No one can control how you think or feel. This is the same for everyone. We're human, goes with the territory.

People have preferences. Preferences can be based on ANYTHING. Life experiences usually have a lot to do with it but there may be a bit of hard wiring involved.

Privilege is something people of mistake for a right. A provider allows someone the privilege of spending time with them. A provider is a human being with their own feelings, thoughts, prejudices, and rights that go with being human. A provider is NOT a vending machine. A provider absolutely has the right to turn anyone away for any reason at all, at all times. The reason isn't important, the right to determine one's own destiny is.

To takes this one step further and tie it into your other thread, ECCIE is a place to advertise services. In some aspects it is like a vending machine, before you insert a dollar. There are a multitude of choices to consider, some of them you won't like, but the choices are there for all the potential customers. If you are not hungry for a TS there's a perfectly good selection of other options, but the guy or girl or trans-gendered individual who walks up next might want something different.

Any person can be a provider. Any provider can choose their clients. It is true that ECCIE allows TS providers the privilege of advertising, but it also allows that same privilege to a wide range of non-TS provider, some of whom you may not be attracted to. We have the privilege and convenience of perusing their showcases before we make a selection and offer our dollar, however(unlike a vending machine) they have the right to decline our business, and the reason for doing so is irrelevant because they have the right to control how they do business.

1. AS I HAVE STATED NUMEROUS TIMES I WAS NOT TURNED ON BY A TS I WAS DISGUSTED BY ONE.

2. As I clearly stated I support a providers right to discriminate. No I do not wish to impose sexual slavery [unless someone is into that and has a good safe word ] reading is fun!

3. All I said was your logic was flawed which it was. You used different logic in your second post to defend your first post. The logic in your second post was not flawed except for the fact you used it to defend the first one.

4. Don't you think it's ironic that everyone in this thread is defending a providers right to discriminate however in my thread we are all the same and we all come here for fun and to relax and I am being a hateful person for saying I don't want to be tricked into looking at pictures of transsexuals? Originally Posted by hookem420

Please explain how my logic is flawed??? the whole point of my original post was to stress that "preferance" is the reason I feel a lot of providers have restrictions I gave an example of another common restriction among providers, I'm just seriously puzzled why it's ok to have one restriction and not the other. You apparently agree with me on the preference, yet your logic is right and mine is flawed. but that's ok I'm not the one who has contradicted himself on multiple occasions these past few days. After reading your other thread I'm glad you don't agree with my post.

[QUOTE=junkweed;1054925441.

To takes this one step further and tie it into your other thread, ECCIE is a place to advertise services. In some aspects it is like a vending machine, before you insert a dollar. There are a multitude of choices to consider, some of them you won't like, but the choices are there for all the potential customers. If you are not hungry for a TS there's a perfectly good selection of other options, but the guy or girl or trans-gendered individual who walks up next might want something different.
[/QUOTE]

The difference is when I look at a vending machine each item is clearly identified. Reeces. Snickers. Coke. Mountain Dew. I don't put in my dollar, press g8 for a honey bun and open it up and it's a cock and some balls which is exactly what happened to me here minus the dollar.


And the first thing I said in this thread was that I agree with a providers right to discriminate. Don't try to act like I didn't.

Please explain how my logic is flawed??? the whole point of my original post was to stress that "preferance" is the reason I feel a lot of providers have restrictions I gave an example of another common restriction among providers, I'm just seriously puzzled why it's ok to have one restriction and not the other. You apparently agree with me on the preference, yet your logic is right and mine is flawed. but that's ok I'm not the one who has contradicted himself on multiple occasions these past few days. After reading your other thread I'm glad you don't agree with my post. Originally Posted by Little Monster

Reread for content and then try again. Your first logic was flawed. Your second logic was not. My logic was never mentioned. And I never contradict myself.

The difference is when I look at a vending machine each item is clearly identified. Reeces. Snickers. Coke. Mountain Dew. I don't put in my dollar, press g8 for a honey bun and open it up and it's a cock and some balls which is exactly what happened to me here minus the dollar.


And the first thing I said in this thread was that I agree with a providers right to discriminate. Don't try to act like I didn't. Originally Posted by hookem420

However, if you were vegan or allergic to nuts(in food) you might not find vending machines so clearly indentifying the contents of the food. At that point most people expect you to do adequate research because of your special sensitivities.