I don't disagree with your expectations. This issue has been discussed over the years a number of times and the consensus of opinion, if I'm remembering correctly, is that providers expect to be paid for their time, whether on "vacation" or not. A cruise out of Galveston is not that expensive, going from "very inexpensive" for a inside cabin to "very expensive" for the highest priced suite. A 5-day cruise from Galveston with an ocean view cabin can be had for as little as $394. Plus extras of course. Why would a provider simply not just pay that herself and take away the expected obligation of having sex with a guy how many times over the course of 4 nights? Hmmm. Maybe I'll try this if it works out for AustinDave. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
I agree. I don't know why any woman would do that. Seems like what he here is a date. Now, if I man I was dating invited me on a cruise, I would expect him to pay for the whole of it, but obviously not give me any extra money as that is not how dating relationships usually work in the 21st century as both parties usually have their own jobs and separate lives, including their own money. In this case, you are talking about a woman for whom this is her job. I would personally rather use my own money to pay for a cruise and not feel sexually obligated to someone I may or might now be that attracted to. But, if I were being compensated for my time, then I would consider it my job to be whatever he so needed for the duration of the trip. Just seems to me that the gent in question is really looking for is a date, not a provider. Might behoove him to find a woman he likes, a friend, SB, FB, think expectations might be more aligned for both parties. I think the situation you might run into is that you might get what you want sexually from her, you might not. And who could blame her, she's not being compensated for that. So, if you are comfortable with a nice gal and simply a probability of her being intimate with you, and you find a provider who is into it, go for it.
Also, sometimes extended dates seem like a good idea, especially monetarily from the provider's point of view, but the chemistry is just not there. I had an experience where I spent a couple of nights with someone, pay for play basis, but we had only see each other once for a couple of hours before that. That was a very, very long two days for me. Wouldn't do it again. Those longer dates can be tricky when you don't know someone.