SCOTUS Sides With Hobby Lobby........

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 07-02-2014, 06:10 PM
Most of the time I don't ask a question if I already know the answer. Do you? Originally Posted by LexusLover
Most?

Yssup Rider's Avatar
Most? Like where is Clarksville? Most of the time, anybody can see where it is... But not you, LLIdiot!
lustylad's Avatar
I wonder how long it will be before the tax scofflaws start filing lawsuits contending that they shouldn't have to pay taxes because it violates their sincerely held religious beliefs? Originally Posted by timpage

Given enough time, today's ruling could walk back 30 years of civil rights progress. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

Say hello to Sharia law thanks to the SCOTUS. Originally Posted by BigLouie

This had no good resolution. But I bet we will be seeing a whole lot of ( "deeply held religious beliefs" coming up soon. This is going to be one hideous mess... Originally Posted by Old-T

Wow – listen to all the overblown libtard hysteria, will ya? Slip, slip, slippery slope.... Did any of you legal scholars notice that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act has been on the books for two decades now? If that Act provided a basis for evading taxes, violating civil rights, or imposing shariah law (lmfao) dontcha think it would have been taken advantage of by now?

This is typical libtard overreaction. The sky is falling, the sky is falling! Let's be fucking honest for once. You libturds are secretly delighted with this decision. It lets you trot out that phony war on women theme and try to scare-monger all the way to November.

.
lustylad's Avatar
it...discriminates against everyone who believes in separation of church and state... we both believe in freedom; the kind upon which this country was founded. The freedom from religious persecution. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
You're an even bigger idiot than anyone thought possible, assup... This decision UPHOLDS the separation of church and state by telling the government it CANNOT engage in religious persecution or force people to violate their sincerely held religious convictions.
LexusLover's Avatar
Most? Like where is Clarksville? Most of the time, anybody can see where it is... But not you, LLIdiot! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
YouRong, I don't "ask" where is Clarksville.... the City of Austin tells me!

http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/def...larksville.pdf

And Enfield Drug ain't in it.
LexusLover's Avatar
Most? Originally Posted by WTF
Yea, most of the time. Like ....

Is that all the substance you have to offer to the thread?

I know the answer to that question!
LexusLover's Avatar
....what does this have to do with Hobby Lobby or constitutional amendments?..... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
When you ask questions you just keep exposing the abyss of ignorance between your ears ......

... You ask ..... what does a list of amendments passed by Republicans ...

... have to with Constitutional amendments? ...


http://www.austintexas.gov/sites/def...larksville.pdf

Now you don't have to ask .... Where is Clarksville? City of Austin tells you.

And Enfield Drug on West Lynn isn't in it, because West Lynn isn't.

Slobber, name call, whine, vomit, and shit on yourself. YouRong.
There will be echos for a long time to come. SCOTUS has already told the lower courts to settle on their decision. There are over a 100 cases pending. Most from Catholic owners.
I B Hankering's Avatar
You're an even bigger idiot than anyone thought possible, assup... This decision UPHOLDS the separation of church and state by telling the government it CANNOT engage in religious persecution or force people to violate their sincerely held religious convictions. Originally Posted by lustylad
+1
Old-T's Avatar
  • Old-T
  • 07-03-2014, 11:57 AM
"Sincerely held religious beliefs" that seem to apply when they have to pay money, but don't hold when they invest money. Just how does that flexibility support "sincerely held"?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 07-03-2014, 12:01 PM
You libturds are secretly delighted with this decision. It lets you trot out that phony war on women theme and try to scare-monger all the way to November.

. Originally Posted by lustylad
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
Money is fungible. I can buy a homeless person a meal from my own pocket or I can give them ten dollars which might go to something else but not food. Which is wrong and which is right. I'm still out ten dollars so I guess I can feel good about myself even if that money goes on to kill that person with drugs or alcohol.

The investment landscape is complicated and I am very sure that my money is invested somewhere in the maze wth companies that I do not like in the least but I can choose not to buy from Coca-Cola, Target, or AARP. This continued harping on this branch of the issue is just desperation talking. You want to have the pleasure of forcing a company (the family really) to toe your line of what is correct and what is not. This is about fascism and basic enumerated rights. No woman is being denied anything by HL. They can go out and get all the birth control they want. Why is this so hard to understand? Lack of brain power or lack of empathy?
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 07-03-2014, 12:08 PM
"Sincerely held religious beliefs" that seem to apply when they have to pay money, but don't hold when they invest money. Just how does that flexibility support "sincerely held"? Originally Posted by Old-T
Either they have strong religious beliefs and have nothing to do with either paying for the pill or making money off it. Or they are full of bullshit.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Money is fungible. I can buy a homeless person a meal from my own pocket or I can give them ten dollars which might go to something else but not food. Which is wrong and which is right. I'm still out ten dollars so I guess I can feel good about myself even if that money goes on to kill that person with drugs or alcohol.

The investment landscape is complicated and I am very sure that my money is invested somewhere in the maze wth companies that I do not like in the least but I can choose not to buy from Coca-Cola, Target, or AARP. This continued harping on this branch of the issue is just desperation talking. You want to have the pleasure of forcing a company (the family really) to toe your line of what is correct and what is not. This is about fascism and basic enumerated rights. No woman is being denied anything by HL. They can go out and get all the birth control they want. Why is this so hard to understand? Lack of brain power or lack of empathy? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
Your cash ain't nothing but trash, you fucking TRAITOR! You stand against every human principle upon which this country was founded. You support an unbridled, evil brand of hypocrisy that indicates your complete lack of self confidence and overabundance of jealousy.

Evil, despicable and TRAITOROUS.

You suck.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
How many Hobby Lobby employees wanted the 4 abortifacients the company won't provide?