Who would have invaded Iraq in 2003? Hillary did but Trump didn't.

Yssup Rider's Avatar
Is this another Benghazi thread?

Jesus!

At least nobody's calling people names here.
  • DSK
  • 12-17-2015, 06:26 PM
Is this another Benghazi thread?

Jesus!

At least nobody's calling people names here. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
What does Jesus have to do with it? What would Jesus do?

Merry Christmas.
It was a joke you stupid shit. Go sit on the porch. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
Regardless, it was funny and (bonus) you're still a dumb fuck.
12blue4u's Avatar
The answer should have been NOBODY. Saddam provided the balance of power against Iraq and actually provided stability. So what if he was a dictator an we "thought" he had WMD's. Shit we know China and North Korea had them. We invade them? Nope. Next to Reagan's conquest of Grenada one if not the greatest blunder of the 20th century. Sometimes you need dictators. Look what happened to Hungary after Tito went died.
12blue4u's Avatar
Eccie posted twice do not know how to delete
[QUOTE=JD Barleycorn;1057560969]Turn this idiotic thread around on WTF. You can forget 20/20 hindsight, lets deal with reality. Hillary voted to use military force in 2003. She also was behind the chaos in Libya after Khadaffi was ousted. She condemned Hussein while still first lady and supported her husband's idea of regime change. Trump didn't do any of that. Not that I am a Trump supporter but he is the front runner. So compare the two front runners and you lefties have to support Trump or you're hypocrites.

"I Actually Did Vote for the $87 Billion, Before I voted Against It." by John Kerry

Pound your head on a rock is easier than attempting to reason with a liberal. Libs tend to look down on the rest of the plebs who can't fathom their logic.
Regardless, it was funny and (bonus) you're still a dumb fuck. Originally Posted by Muscleup
Thanks for thinking my comment was funny. For a dumb fuck you did catch on.
Thanks for thinking my comment was funny. For a dumb fuck you did catch on. Originally Posted by i'va biggen
You got that liberal logic. That's fo sho.
You got that liberal logic. That's fo sho. Originally Posted by Muscleup
Yo so dumb yo thnk me a lib. LMAO
lustylad's Avatar
Next to Reagan's conquest of Grenada one if not the greatest blunder of the 20th century. Sometimes you need dictators. Look what happened to Hungary after Tito went died. Originally Posted by 12blue4u
Just when you thought this forum couldn't get much stupider, another dipshit pops up to dumb it down even more! I have a sense of humor, but this ignoramus doesn't seem to be making a joke when he says Grenada was one of our greatest blunders and Tito was ruler of Hungary. Is he as strung out as his avatar?

Time to play dumb and dumber - next!
.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
What the fuck is a "bankruptcy do over"? Trump isn't my candidate but he understands real estate a lot better than you do, dickmuncher. A developer can take out 20 loans to build 20 properties, let one or two go bankrupt and hold on to the winners. Do you know what non-recourse means? Never mind, just tell everyone exactly what you mean by "bankruptcy do overs". Are you saying his creditors and the bankruptcy judge or trustees accorded him special treatment? You've obviously done your homework on this so spit it out, dickmuncher. What are you saying?
. Originally Posted by lustylad
What do you think it means douche-bag? It means when you declare bankruptcy, you get to start over. You know, a do over. Duh dick breath.
You forgot to add yourself in the order of knowing real estate. You of course would be last. A developer is incorporated to protect his personal goodies. Individual properties he owns don't go bankrupt. The corporation goes bankrupt. Depending on the type of bankruptcy (which chapter), the judge decides what happens to those properties you pretended to let go bankrupt on their own. Plus I didn't say or imply he got special treatment. I don't know where you got that. Unless it was the same place you keep your head and where you got you "keep these and let those go" properties. You know, your ass.
Munchmasterman's Avatar
The answer should have been NOBODY. Saddam provided the balance of power against Iraq and actually provided stability. So what if he was a dictator an we "thought" he had WMD's. Shit we know China and North Korea had them. We invade them? Nope. Next to Reagan's conquest of Grenada one if not the greatest blunder of the 20th century. Sometimes you need dictators. Look what happened to Hungary after Tito went died. Originally Posted by 12blue4u
Looks like one of our resident blow -hards missed an obvious mistake. Iraq provided the balance of power against Iran. Let's hear it for trusty douche-bag

Just when you thought this forum couldn't get much stupider, another dipshit pops up to dumb it down even more! I have a sense of humor, but this ignoramus doesn't seem to be making a joke when he says Grenada was one of our greatest blunders and Tito was ruler of Hungary. Is he as strung out as his avatar?

Time to play dumb and dumber - next!
. Originally Posted by lustylad
And our next moron is the moron pointing who the morons are. Kind of like a moron cubed. Except more prone to hoisting himself. On his own petard that is.
Not much left to say except "How is the view from up there, trusty douche-bag?"
LexusLover's Avatar
What do you think it means douche-bag? It means when you declare bankruptcy, you get to start over. You know, a do over. Duh dick breath. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
Did Donald Trump file bankruptcy?
LexusLover's Avatar
Iraq provided the balance of power against Iran. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
And your point?
Munchmasterman's Avatar
Did Donald Trump file bankruptcy? Originally Posted by LexusLover
No. But at least one of the corporations he was CEO of and had a controlling interest in did. Read my other post where I said developers incorporate to protect their personal assets. A very standard business practice.

And your point? Originally Posted by LexusLover
If you can't figure it out from reading the posts then walking you through it won't help.
Is one of the self proclaimed smart guys really a dullard? Read the posts again and tell me what my point was. If you can't then you're just another douche-bag living with the fear of being exposed for the turd he is, living in a city so large that even a person such as himself can perform the acts he projects onto other cities in complete anonymity.

Let me know when you figure out what that point was. Or let me know when you can't.