I only know what I research on this matter. From Judges, lawyers, intelligence experts and government officials, there is enough evidence to indict her now. By all accounts, Comey is an honorable man. He's not a political hack. The Constitution and law are his guide. He wont back down to political pressure. He has committed large resources to investigate this matter. I feel comfortable that he will come to the correct conclusion. I'll be good with his findings.
Originally Posted by bambino
And there are judges, lawyers, intelligence experts and government officials who say there isn't enough (at least publicly known). When it comes to taking down someone politically powerful, you are going to find people from all walks of life who are going to reiterate the opinion that you want to hear. That doesn't make them right.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...resign-protest
On that point, I am still waiting for anyone here to offer up non-circumstantial evidence that she knowingly sent or received classified documents. The
only pieces of evidence offered up so far are "classified material was found on her server," which
could be easily explained as some things being made classified ex post facto or she simply did not know the material was classified, and the email chain at discussion in this thread, which no one has been able to demonstrate is actually referring to a piece of classified information.
So you can parrot the opinions of some experts, who may or may not have other motives behind their opinions, or you can prove your point. Your choice.
Of course you are! That's why it's so difficult for you to wrap your "brain" around the simple-minded deception of Hillarious and "why" she did it. Or is it that you actually know and you are just being difficult period.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
I don't follow at all. How does me actually having experience with both classified material and with encryption/authentication mean that it is hard for me to understand both?
The "pattern" of lack of credibility that Hillarious has cultivated and nurtured over the years of public presence as Bill's wife (about as commendable as being a "community organizer") factors into the equation as to her current behavior and "explanations" regarding her NONEXISTENT emails that have suddenly appeared after a Judge had to order them produced. Keep in mind that EVERYONE produced by the SOS is still ON HER SERVER'S HARD DRIVE (and you know that also, because of your "extensive knowledge" of all things computer) that are being (or have been) harvested by COMEY and his band of loyal investigators. But in your blind loyalty to Hillarious, you choose to ignore THOSE FACTS! As you pretend to be "fair and balanced" while you wait for an "indictment" as proof that she violated numerous Federal laws, as well as common sense and good judgment, and loyalty to the belief that U.S. voters should know the truth about her behavior and conduct BEFORE THEY VOTE FOR HER!
I'm not going to debate any "pattern." I'll stick to the topic at hand. If you have any non-circumstantial evidence, I would like to see it. But your repeated attacks on me are not evidence of anything. Sorry. I hope the investigation ends soon, so that the voters have a chance to vote based on the actual facts of the case, rather than the partisan spin all people (from both sides of the isle) are putting on the facts as we know them.