Why are you cowards so scared to discuss the HONESTY of Rand Paul?

The village idiot has termed out. And now his brother is paying the price.

Best way to guarantee a commie president is 3rd party... see Canada...


fuckers

Idiots like you do not understand that you can not have both smaller government and Policing the world.

It is Tea Pukes like you that are wtf is wrong with this country....on one hand you call for smaller government , on the other you call for a huge expansion of government and it's resources with your bullshit foreign policy. Originally Posted by WTF

True libertarians, like me, are in favor of small government and isolationism.
We could buy our way out of our commitments to war with the rest of the world - print the money - else what is the Fed for, other than enriching the insiders?

True libertarians, like me, are in favor of small government and isolationism. Originally Posted by DSK

WTF is throwing tantrums again ... the stressers are taking their toll.

Idiots like you do not understand that you can not have both smaller government and Policing the world.

It is Tea Pukes like you that are wtf is wrong with this country....on one hand you call for smaller government , on the other you call for a huge expansion of government and it's resources with your bullshit foreign policy. Originally Posted by WTF

i never said i favored the tea party. idiot. the size and sheer waste of the government is obscene. you could fire a third of the government and it easily would be able to handle government affairs. there's a lot of redundancy and overlap. getting rid of that would be a good start.

i don't think the USA should be the "world cop" but we do have commitments in NATO, to Japan, South Korea and elsewhere. what do you think would happen if the US pulled out of South Korea? do you think North Korea wouldn't eventually attack? they would, even if China told them not to and wouldn't support them. South Korea's army is about 500,000 active duty, North Korea's over twice that size at 1.1 million. on paper that's a huge advantage. in terms of readiness and equipment not so much as North Korea's equipment is very dated while South Korea's is more modern due clearly to the South's prosperity.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_People's_Army

Although the North Korean military once enjoyed a startling advantage against its counterpart in South Korea, its relative isolation and economic plight starting from the 1980s has now tipped the balance of military power into the hands of the better-equipped South Korean military.[20] In response to this predicament, North Korea relies on asymmetric warfare techniques and unconventional weaponry to achieve parity against high-tech enemy forces.[20] North Korea is reported to have developed a wide range of technologies towards this end, such as stealth paint to conceal ground targets,[34] midget submarines and human torpedoes,[35] blinding laser weapons,[36] and probably has a chemical weapons program and is likely to possess a stockpile of chemical weapons.[37] The Korean People's Army operates ZM-87 anti-personnel lasers, which are banned under the United Nations Protocol on Blinding Laser Weapons.[36]


who says you can't have a small federal government and still have a well equipped Military? we already outspend several the of the largest military budgets of other nations combined.




we don't need to be spending that huge amount of money on the Military. our defense spending equals that of the next highest budgets from 2nd (China) down to 11th (Brazil) combined.

Rank Country Spending
($ Bn.) % of GDP Per capita ($) — World total 1629 1.7 224
1 United States 581.0 3.0 1821
2 China 129.4 1.2 95
3 Saudi Arabia 80.8 10.7 2803
4 Russia 70.0 3.7 488
5 United Kingdom 61.8 2.1 964
6 France 53.1 1.8 804
7 Japan 47.7 1.0 375
8 India 45.2 2.2 35
9 Germany 43.9 1.1 541
10 South Korea 34.4 2.4 668
11 Brazil 31.9 1.3 155
12 Italy 24.3 1.1 400
13 Israel 23.2 7.4 2755
14 Australia 22.5 1.5 938
15 Iraq 18.9 8.5 525 —
Rest 203.3



honoring alliances and treaties is one thing, running around being "World Cop" is completely different and we shouldn't be doing it.

As long as we have the Electorial College, no third party will be elected.

About the best thing going for Rand Paul is he is not near as loony as his old man.

Idiots like you do not understand that you can not have both smaller government and Policing the world.

It is Tea Pukes like you that are wtf is wrong with this country....on one hand you call for smaller government , on the other you call for a huge expansion of government and it's resources with your bullshit foreign policy. Originally Posted by WTF

+ Many

WTF is throwing tantrums again ... the stressers are taking their toll. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I'll bet that spec house he put two million into won't sell now that the oil money is on the sidelines. I'd be a bit uptight, too.

Poor WTF....

So NOW JL is a Librarian?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA!

True libertarians, like me, are in favor of small government and isolationism.
We could buy our way out of our commitments to war with the rest of the world - print the money - else what is the Fed for, other than enriching the insiders? Originally Posted by DSK

You are too stupid to be a true Libertarian. No Libertarian thinks that printing fiat money at will is a good idea. In fact, true Libertarians favor ending the FED and backing our money with gold or silver.

I'll bet that spec house he put two million into won't sell now that the oil money is on the sidelines. I'd be a bit uptight, too.

Poor WTF.... Originally Posted by DSK

I told you I been out of that business for a good while and in a cash position. Things go to shit around here, I could pick up some good deals.

You are too stupid to be a true Libertarian. No Libertarian thinks that printing fiat money at will is a good idea. In fact, true Libertarians favor ending the FED and backing our money with gold or silver. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Are you saying Nixon was impeached for the wrong thing?

Amazing that, no matter which handle he's using at the time, the "enematic" JL is still fixated on WTF's business.

He tried to woo their vote...huge difference from being one.

He is nowhere near that ignorant. Originally Posted by WTF

Whatever helps you sleep through the night Stupid Bitch.

Gary Johnson is electable. We need to demand third party inclusion in polls and debates. The only things keeping Johnson from being elected are the owners of the Democrat and Republican parties, who also own the media. If you vote for an "electable" Republican or Democrat, you are voting for the same, or worse, crap that we have now. No one who isn't owned by the Establishment elitists will get a major party nomination. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Your point about third parties may be valid but it doesn't have anything to do with Gary being electable as POTUS. He's just not that strong of a candidate.

Whatever helps you sleep through the night Stupid Bitch.



. Originally Posted by gnadfly

The Tea Party did not care for Rand's libertarian foreign policy.....or his stance on abortion.

He courted your vote but he was no Tea Partier.