Powell sets Clinton straight!

I researched what Conason said and found that Powell denied saying it. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Yes, of course! Did you ask Powell himself?

All that shit doesn't matter.

HillaryNoMore lied again and got caught again.

"Stratified"? Not the word you're looking for, but whatever. I know you badly need to look educated. You fled to this thread after making a fool out of yourself in the others. It's not about "winning" - it's about making sense and not contradicting and embarrassing yourself. You're now solidly in the running for eccie Dipshit of the Year.
If you look I posted in several threads about this so there was no fleeing. I wanted to show what hypoctrites you are and that is all you have done so far.
No one insisted anything Joe Conason said was true. IB merely pointed out that his statement as quoted by a NYT reporter - whether true or false - was improperly edited by others seeking to alter its meaning and mislead readers. That is not a vouch for the veracity of his statement; it's a rebuke of the media that engages in such deliberate manipulations.
Bullshit! I said I wanted more proof and you guys had none. Most likely because you found what I did. That Powell denied saying it .
You reflexively attacked Conason as a "liar" and a "hack" because you thought by doing so you were disagreeing with IB. You weren't. You're too stupid to understand this, and you've been flailing ever since. Give it up, pockface. You can't fix stupid. You're just a dimwitted troll. Originally Posted by lustylad

I did not simply react to IB's post I did a search and came up with the link showing Powell denied it. You guys are either beligerent or figured I got it from some liberal site so you continued to run your mouth about Conason would not have lied and it must be true. Now you have egg on your face. I think it egg at least LOL

Yes, of course! Did you ask Powell himself?

All that shit doesn't matter.

HillaryNoMore lied again and got caught again. Originally Posted by LexusLover

See what I mean. You argue That Powell said it one minute and then you switch to suit whatever you need the next. Hypocrite.
I wanted to know if there were any other witnesses. Why would I ask that? Why did no one else hear what was said or not? You see I don't know who said what and have not claimed to. You on the other hand are smug and arrogant.

Just because I don't believe what you distort something into does not mean I make a strawman argument. I researched what Conason said and found that Powell denied saying it. You are the fool that didnt believe me and now are eating crow. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the dumbass too stupid to see that the veracity of Conason's statement doesn't change the fact that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC misrepresented what the New York Times reported Conason said, MT Jockass, and you'd be the stupid jackass distorting that fact to fit your strawman argument.

You'd be the dumbass too stupid to see that the veracity of Conason's statement doesn't change the fact that flighty, Yahoo and CNBC misrepresented what the New York Times reported Conason said, MT Jockass, and you'd be the stupid jackass distorting that fact to fit your strawman argument. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You are too stupid to understand that has nothing to do with the fact you do not research your posting. You go with whatever supports your agenda. I never said that any of those sources were right or wrong.
You keep trying to filibuster your way out of looking like a clown, with all the repeats and name calling.

IBIdiot is really good at name calling...telling the truth, not at all.

Just watch.

You are too stupid to understand that has nothing to do with the fact you do not research your posting. You go with whatever supports your agenda. I never said that any of those sources were right or wrong.
You keep trying to filibuster your way out of looking like a clown, with all the repeats and name calling. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You'd be the lying dumbass too stupid to realize that it was, in fact, researching the source document that proved flighty, Yahoo and CNBC were lying about what was reported in the New York Times, MT Jockstrap.

See what I mean. You argue That Powell said it one minute and then you switch to suit whatever you need the next. Hypocrite.
I wanted to know if there were any other witnesses. Why would I ask that? Why did no one else hear what was said or not? You see I don't know who said what and have not claimed to. You on the other hand are smug and arrogant. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Are you drunk?

Let me get this straight .... you are asking on a hooker board if there were any other witnesses to Powell saying "something" or are you sticking with "it"?????

I'm not arguing that Powell said anything .... you are the one arguing and tossing around attempted insults ....

It is reported he doesn't recall having ANY conversation with her at any dinner party, BUT did recall sending her an email describing what he did, which was nothing like she was doing when he sent the email.

She's lying. You really only have two choices:

That's one ... the other one may be worse for the country ...

.. she gets advice from someone with more experience than she and she ignores it!!!!

You keep trying to filibuster your way out of looking like a clown, with all the repeats and name calling. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Sounds like you. Pot calling kettle black!!!!

You'd be the lying dumbass too stupid to realize that it was, in fact, researching the source document that proved flighty, Yahoo and CNBC were lying about what was reported in the New York Times, MT Jockstrap.



Originally Posted by I B Hankering

WTF? I have told you a dozen times I never commented about any of those sources or flighty. I commented about Conason and if anyone else heard to conversation. You are pathetic you assume things and do not pay attention. You rely on "LL" and "LL" to back you up so you are sloppy.

I commented about Conason and if anyone else heard to conversation. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You think "Conason" heard the ALLEGED conversation?

Condi Rice doesn't recall such a conversation.

How many does it take...?

HillaryNoMore has ZERO CREDIBILITY!

And the loyalists think Powell now Rice are lying!!!!

WTF? I have told you a dozen times I never commented about any of those sources or flighty. I commented about Conason and if anyone else heard to conversation. You are pathetic you assume things and do not pay attention. You rely on "LL" and "LL" to back you up so you are sloppy. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You're a lying SOB, MT Jockstrap. The fact that you ignorantly commented on posts wherein I sourced and quoted the New York Times article to illustrate how flighty, Yahoo and CNBC were lying is proof that your lying ass did comment on those sources, MT Jockstrap.

Conason is not a reliable source. Do you have any else to support what he said. You may be right but it takes more than a hacks word. Originally Posted by MT Pockets

You're a stupid lib-retard, MT Jockstrap. Flighty cited a Yahoo article as the source, MT Jockstrap. The Yahoo article cited a CNBC article as the source, MT Jockstrap. CNBC article cited the New York Times as the source, MT Jockstrap. The New York Times cited journalist Joe Conason with the quote cited above as the source, MT Jockstrap: a source that pre-dates hildebeest's interview with the FBI, MT Jockstrap, and the New York Time's source conveniently taken out of context with the omission of key words by CNBC, Yahoo and flighty, MT Jockstrap. BTW, MT Jockstrap, it's hildebeest who cannot be trusted to be a reliable source. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You guys... continued to run your mouth about Conason would not have lied and it must be true... Originally Posted by MT Pockets

See what I mean. You argue That Powell said it one minute and then you switch... Originally Posted by MT Pockets

Quit lying. We read the same posts you do. I'll say it again slowly...

No one... insisted... anything... Joe Conason... said... was... true...

Repeat that 250 times and quit making things up, you insipid twaddle-twat!

That depends on your definition of "is."

Gripshits.

That depends on your definition of "is." Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Depends? Go change your diaper, oinkboy. The smell is fouling up this thread.