They are not rules, they are called guidelines. Nothing more needs to be said. Originally Posted by davidfree986Either way, still needs to be followed and enforced, equally and without prejudice or preference.
So why the strong-arming? The bullying?
That's great I like the above.
We don't have all bad mods gman44 has done a great job IMO. It's only the other two that IMO have ran afoul of the guidelines. Originally Posted by bamadog78
censorship
[sen-ser-ship]
noun 1. the act or practice of censoring.
2. the office or power of a censor.
3. the time during which a censor holds office.
4. the inhibiting and distorting activity of the Freudian censor.
-----------
censor
[sen-ser]
noun 1. an official who examines books, plays, news reports, motion pictures, radio and television programs, letters, cablegrams, etc., for the purpose of suppressing parts deemed objectionable on moral, political, military, or other grounds.
2. any person who supervises the manners or morality of others.
3. an adverse critic; faultfinder.
4. (in the ancient Roman republic) either of two officials who kept the register or census of the citizens, awarded public contracts, and supervised manners and morals.
5. (in early Freudian dream theory) the force that represses ideas, impulses, and feelings, and prevents them from entering consciousness in their original, undisguised forms.
verb (used with object) 6. to examine and act upon as a censor.
7. to delete (a word or passage of text) in one's capacity as a censor.
Folks, I don't want to be a hard ass or over moderate, but all the drama, baiting and name-calling over Vanessa ends NOW. Everything that has been said on the subject has been said. I will be closing and locking threads on this topic. I will be monitoring reviews and new threads. If they digress back to the drama, those threads will be closed. If certain people feel the need to continually bring up this subject, the moderators will discuss potential disciplinary action. You have been warned. Originally Posted by Cpalmson
Now does any of the above quote fall under the realm of the provided definition(s) Originally Posted by Dorian Gray
Uh...Guess it does
That's NOT how we do things...if a member makes a post on a thread that is against the guidelines, they are warned or given points for violating the those guidelines.
We don't close threads simply because of "drama"
Thread opened... Originally Posted by DickEmDown
Either way, still needs to be followed and enforced, equally and without prejudice or preference.You are right, it NEEDS to be all done equally, but given the providers who give up the pussy for free to mods, the pimps who let the mods see their girls for free, and the general ass kissing, ect., all leading up to a term called "pocket mod", then equality goes out the window.
So why the strong-arming? The bullying? Originally Posted by hotrix1
You are right, it NEEDS to be all done equally, but given the providers who give up the pussy for free to mods, the pimps who let the mods see their girls for free, and the general ass kissing, ect., all leading up to a term called "pocket mod", then equality goes out the window.Fuckin pocket mod.... I wish I would have come up with that. That is exactly what I see going on here.
And don't forget, when one of those members has a pocket mod, not only do they get amnesty from adhering to the guidelines, but they also tell that pocket mod what to do to members they do not like. There are MULTIPLE examples of this all over the board. Originally Posted by davidfree986