Specifically who was that informed you anyone one in the White House was "so panic (sic) after the meeting that they had to alert the CIA and the NSA to contain the damage?"
It would be SOP that the intelligence folks would be informed that certain information was provided to representatives of another country, so the intelligence folks wouldn't be "surprised" if they heard it "on the street" and would know exactly what was disclosed.
It seems the "leak" came from the communication channels with the intelligence folks ... and they are the ones who contacted the Post, et al. But what's hillarious is IT IS BEING REPORTED that the source of the intel was ISRAEL!!!!
Ya'll get back to your coloring books and comfort pets.
Originally Posted by LexusLover
Anybody remember the time the Obama administration revealed the top CIA spy in Afghanistan? There was hardly a peep about Obama or his staff's competence or loyalty from the friendly media.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/...y-afghanistan/
Now go find yourself another coloring book and comfort pet....
Originally Posted by andymarksman
Why don't you find yourself a fidget toy off the playground you like to peruse?
Quote:
Report: 44,000+ Emails and Attachments Sent To Wikileaks by DNC Staffer Seth Rich…
Posted on May 16, 2017 by sundance
The family of murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich is denying Rich was in communication with WikiLeaks. However, according to a Fox report based on a federal investigator:
“44,053 emails and 17,761 attachments between Democratic National Committee leaders, spanning from January 2015 through late May 2016, were transferred from Rich to MacFadyen before May 21.” (link)
This image has been resized. Click this bar to view the full image. The original image is sized %1%2.
If that report is accurate, and it’s too specific of a report to be considered a disingenuous assertion not founded in fact, two large issues immediately surface:
#1) The vast Russian conspiracy narrative about hackers being the source of the DNC leaks evaporates. Which could explain why the DNC refused to allow the FBI to review the servers etc.
so getting to the truth of the leaks wasn't a priority of the DNC? who knew? bahhaaa
#2) More alarmingly – With all of the expended investigative resources used by the FBI counterintelligence investigation, former FBI Director James Comey had to have known Seth Rich was the source of the DNC leaks.
so Comey was a political operative? that's not in his job description. which is why the Lord Emperor fired him.
That brings up even more questions about Director James Comey and his political motivations in creating an investigatory narrative that was entirely different from the facts known within the FBI.
the FBI will be better off after the Lord Emperor appoints a real director. never mind that oath of fealty .. it's to Justice and the USA.
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Again, I'll reiterate I have not seen where the FBI itself had direct control of the DNC's email servers. Any information given to the FBI about the DNCs email servers have been given to the FBI through the DNC's contractor called "Crowdstrike."
This is akin to a murder suspect giving all the information to the police including access to the murder scene after scrubbing and contaminating said scene. The basis for the investigation is flaky on many levels. In other words, fake news.
I have stock in Malin single strand! I get my dividends in product! I prefer #27!
