There are still numerous investigations against hildebeest still on going.Awesome news!
hildebeest is still more unpopular than Trump. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
TRUMP FINALLY WINS POPULAR VOTE
Source: Bloomberg News
Wonder what the difference is between a illegal and a H1B person taking your job? Originally Posted by bamscramTechnically, nothing. Realistically, the one on the H1B visa is at least FOLLOWING The law.. Even if i find it wrong that companies import so much work, while IGNORING home grown talent..
Technically, nothing. Realistically, the one on the H1B visa is at least FOLLOWING The law.. Even if i find it wrong that companies import so much work, while IGNORING home grown talent..Mr MAGA is importing foreign labor.
Hankering , i LOVE that CLINT poster!! Originally Posted by garhkal
I believe that you do not understand true free market economics. I suggest you read the entire link and a book or two on the matter. If you are to busy, I've highlighted the basics for you.
You believe that the government should control and regulate everything so the playing field has some imaginary even surface.
. Originally Posted by The2Dogs
And i agree, he is BEING a hypocrite... BUT he's not breaking the law.. Originally Posted by garhkalIf he makes it through the special prosecutors probe and they say he is not breaking the law, I will agree with you
I believe that you do not understand true free market economics. I suggest you read the entire link and a book or two on the matter. If you are to busy, I've highlighted the basics for you.WTF you are talking way over 2dogs head. Its clear from his post he doesn't know what hes talking about
https://www.theglobalist.com/adam-sm...ists-of-labor/
Yet no sensible economist would disagree that the free movement of a factor of production is efficiency-enhancing. For the same reason that the movement of labor from Virginia to California is good for the global economy, the movement of labor from Mexico to the United States must also be good.
There is no fundamental difference between the two factors of production, capital and labor. The rules of economics do not apply to one and not to the other.
The differential treatment of cross-border movement of labor and capital among free-market economists exposes the flaw of an incomplete, or not fully consistent, argument. If free movement of one factor of production (labor) can be limited when it is in the interests of a certain political community, there is no reason why a different political community may not limit the free movement of another factor (capital) if it judges that to be in its interest.
All of economics is then seen as a subject of negotiation and bargaining between different groups of people: Imposing price controls is not fundamentally different from limiting the free flow of capital or labor. But if we care about global welfare and take economic theory seriously, they should all be free. Originally Posted by WTF
WTF you are talking way over 2dogs head. Its clear from his post he doesn't know what hes talking aboutFor some strange reason they love the free flow of capital but not labor.
I think he has to work and is bitter, looking to play the role of "victim" Originally Posted by themystic
For some strange reason they love the free flow of capital but not labor.I think you and this mystic man should get together and make music together.
Where is the economic genius lustyladyboy?
He usually has something hypocritical to say in matters such as these!
. Originally Posted by WTF