NYC loses 1K restaurants, Applebee's fires 1k w/$15 min

I think EATLER is just thrilled that he actually finished a reading assignment over summer vacation. First time, fat boy?

I think EATLER is just thrilled that he actually finished a reading assignment over summer vacation. First time, fat boy?

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The problem is...he did not read it completely or he does not understand what he read.

If that's him, I guess he does have big hands!

. People in the real economy are hurting. Originally Posted by bambino

Originally Posted by WTF

I get drunker than 10 Indians all the time!!!!

I think EATLER is just thrilled that he actually finished a reading assignment over summer vacation. First time, fat boy?

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Another selfie from the slovenly PIG

The problem is...he did not read it completely or he does not understand what he read.

If that's him, I guess he does have big hands! Originally Posted by WTF

You didn't read it completely you nimrod. Or you obviously didn't comprehend what you read. Don't forget to pay your illegals $15.00 per hour! Now go let Asswipe suck your cock.

Originally Posted by WTF

A couple of days ago, I saw an incongruous post on social media from an outspoken open borders advocate. He's been vociferously opposed to Trump since before Trump became the Republican candidate for president. In his opinion, this open borders advocate decries, Trump does not represent American values because Trump wants to enforce this nation's immigration laws. This individual's incongruous post, however, had to do with the upcoming Mayweather-MacGregor fight. Believe it or not, this hypocritical individual who is an advocate for allowing illegals to pour across the border unfettered had the nerve to denounce Americans who were pulling for MacGregor because -- get this -- MacGregor isn't an American!?!

A couple of days ago, I saw an incongruous post on social media from an outspoken open borders advocate. He's been vociferously opposed to Trump since before Trump became the Republican candidate for president. In his opinion, this open borders advocate decries, Trump does not represent American values because Trump wants to enforce this nation's immigration laws. This individual's incongruous post, however, had to do with the upcoming Mayweather-MacGregor fight. Believe it or not, this hypocritical individual who is an advocate for allowing illegals to pour across the border unfettered had the nerve to denounce Americans who were pulling for MacGregor because -- get this -- MacGregor isn't an American!?! Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Well then he is a hypocrite and as many have seen on here, I'm not a fan of hypocrites.

IMHO....this fight is not much more than Wrestling Hype. Mayweather will toy with him. They are both tops in their respective fields but would you challenge a brain surgeon to surgery on the brain if you were a foot doctor? Other than the money, this fight makes no sense.

WTF, the village idiot, I never said a word about restricting labor markets. You lying cocksucking idiot.

I am opposed to ILLEGAL immigration.
I am opposed to the use of H-1B visas in a manner that it was not intended (replacing American workers with immigrants when there are plenty of Americans available for work in that skill set).
I am opposed to government regulation of wages.
I am opposed to the globalist view of a borderless world that goes against the sovereignty of our nation.
I am opposed to using ILLEGAL immigrants in our labor force.

I believe that ILLEGAL immigration has artificially kept wages low.
I believe that the free market will allow wages to find their level based on what people are willing to work for and what the businesses can afford to pay and remain in business.

You are worse than the libtard media telling people that just listened to a person speak and then try to tell them that person said something completely different. Why don't you go build a habitat for humility, lying cocksucker.

WTF, the village idiot, I never said a word about restricting labor markets. You lying cocksucking idiot.

I am opposed to ILLEGAL immigration.
I am opposed to the use of H-1B visas in a manner that it was not intended (replacing American workers with immigrants when there are plenty of Americans available for work in that skill set).
I am opposed to government regulation of wages.
I am opposed to the globalist view of a borderless world that goes against the sovereignty of our nation.
I am opposed to using ILLEGAL immigrants in our labor force.

I believe that ILLEGAL immigration has artificially kept wages low.
I believe that the free market will allow wages to find their level based on what people are willing to work for and what the businesses can afford to pay and remain in business.

You are worse than the libtard media telling people that just listened to a person speak and then try to tell them that person said something completely different. Why don't you go build a habitat for humility, lying cocksucker. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Now, now, no need to get emotional.

It is not my fault if you do not understand the Free Flow of Labor is just as important as the Free Flow of Capital.

You say you are not against something I never said a word about restricting labor markets

and turn around and post that in fact you are: I am opposed to ILLEGAL immigration.

Highlighting a criminal activity in red does not make it mean something different than what it is.
Stopping ILLEGAL immigration is not restriction of the LEGAL labor market.
It is ILLEGAL to hire ILLEGAL immigrants for work within the United States.
I can understand that you desire to have the cheapest labor you can find for your over-priced hovels so that you can enrich yourself by cheating the system and hiring ILLEGAL immigrant workers but that does not solve the labor problem or do anything to improve the wage of the American worker. If you cannot find Americans willing to work for you, perhaps you should pay a little more for their labor, say about 15 bucks an hour plus fringes and toss in a health insurance plan and a matching 401K tied to profit sharing.
Maybe then you would not have to break the law or force your sub-contractors to break the law.

You know, maybe you personally could be the start of a resurgence of craftsmanship in the American workforce.

Highlighting a criminal activity in red does not make it mean something different than what it is.
Stopping ILLEGAL immigration is not restriction of the LEGAL labor market.
It is ILLEGAL to hire ILLEGAL immigrants for work within the United States.
I can understand that you desire to have the cheapest labor you can find for your over-priced hovels so that you can enrich yourself by cheating the system and hiring ILLEGAL immigrant workers but that does not solve the labor problem or do anything to improve the wage of the American worker. If you cannot find Americans willing to work for you, perhaps you should pay a little more for their labor, say about 15 bucks an hour plus fringes and toss in a health insurance plan and a matching 401K tied to profit sharing.
Maybe then you would not have to break the law or force your sub-contractors to break the law.

You know, maybe you personally could be the start of a resurgence of craftsmanship in the American workforce. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Funny how you bring up a criminal activity on a hooker board. So you just pick and choose what laws you think are worthy of following....hmmmm.

Next , you saying I hire illegal immigrants or that I force others to....damn sure don't make it true.

Now to the red thing...

I am opposed to the use of H-1B visas in a manner that it was not intended (replacing American workers with immigrants when there are plenty of Americans available for work in that skill set).

wtf does this even mean? Does it mean that you are opposed to Trump bringing over workers to work in his resorts while there are plenty of workers here to work in them? Are you opposed to the Trumps' family manufacturing clothes made overseas when there are workers right in here in this country that can make those products?

https://www.theglobalist.com/adam-sm...ists-of-labor/

Yet no sensible economist would disagree that the free movement of a factor of production is efficiency-enhancing. For the same reason that the movement of labor from Virginia to California is good for the global economy, the movement of labor from Mexico to the United States must also be good.

The differential treatment of cross-border movement of labor and capital among free-market economists exposes the flaw of an incomplete, or not fully consistent, argument. If free movement of one factor of production (labor) can be limited when it is in the interests of a certain political community, there is no reason why a different political community may not limit the free movement of another factor (capital) if it judges that to be in its interest.
All of economics is then seen as a subject of negotiation and bargaining between different groups of people: Imposing price controls is not fundamentally different from limiting the free flow of capital or labor. But if we care about global welfare and take economic theory seriously, they should all be free.

Highlighting a criminal activity in red does not make it mean something different than what it is.
Stopping ILLEGAL immigration is not restriction of the LEGAL labor market.
It is ILLEGAL to hire ILLEGAL immigrants for work within the United States.
I can understand that you desire to have the cheapest labor you can find for your over-priced hovels so that you can enrich yourself by cheating the system and hiring ILLEGAL immigrant workers but that does not solve the labor problem or do anything to improve the wage of the American worker. If you cannot find Americans willing to work for you, perhaps you should pay a little more for their labor, say about 15 bucks an hour plus fringes and toss in a health insurance plan and a matching 401K tied to profit sharing.
Maybe then you would not have to break the law or force your sub-contractors to break the law.

You know, maybe you personally could be the start of a resurgence of craftsmanship in the American workforce. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Would you buy an upscale shack from SnitchFuck? He employs the cheapest, unskilled labor. Because he believes in it. They can't read a level or use a T square, but who cares! He's a man of the people! Your house may blow over, but you helped some unskilled labor! I know this is a stretch, Snitchy couldn't build a dog house!

https://www.theglobalist.com/adam-sm...ists-of-labor/

Yet no sensible economist would disagree that the free movement of a factor of production is efficiency-enhancing. For the same reason that the movement of labor from Virginia to California is good for the global economy, the movement of labor from Mexico to the United States must also be good.

The differential treatment of cross-border movement of labor and capital among free-market economists exposes the flaw of an incomplete, or not fully consistent, argument. If free movement of one factor of production (labor) can be limited when it is in the interests of a certain political community, there is no reason why a different political community may not limit the free movement of another factor (capital) if it judges that to be in its interest.
All of economics is then seen as a subject of negotiation and bargaining between different groups of people: Imposing price controls is not fundamentally different from limiting the free flow of capital or labor. But if we care about global welfare and take economic theory seriously, they should all be free. Originally Posted by WTF

TYT is a combination of both of these Genuine 0zombies...