LA Voting Rolls Have 144% of the Total Number of Eligible Residents

Dead people are on voting rolls because the election board has not received notification they died. Originally Posted by bamscram

When a family has sent in copies (notorised) of their father's death certificate for 8 straight years, BUT after removing him, within 4 months his name REAPPEARS on the voter rolls, that's not cause they never got proper notification.. THAT IS FLAT OUT someone returning him, cause THEY FEEL he shold still be on it..

Cite an example of another county in this country where dim-retards aren't in control of the voter registration rolls where a full 1/3 of the listed voters are ineligible to vote ... and where that number of ineligible voters approaches a number anywhere near 1.5 million -- which is more than half the 2.8 million margin of victory for hildebeest in California that ignorant dim-retards keep crowing about. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Add to that, SEVERAL cases from the 08 and 12 elections, where several counties in FL alone, Recorded well over 20% MORE VOTES in those counties, than are actually registered, and something's hinky..

Nobody said there is no voter fraud....the trick is not fixing the small amount of voter fraud with a huge amount of voter suppression.

We should do both expand voter participation and get rid of voter fraud. Originally Posted by WTF

And IYO how much voter fraud must go on, before it's actually seen as a problem? 1% of the population (which equates to over 3 MILLION Fraudulent votes)? .1% which is only 300 thousand fraudulent votes??

And how is requiring proper ID, voter suppression?

Judicial Watch?! What a fucking surprise! Their track records are so dismal that their bogus allegations without credible stats don't mean shit.


http://washingtontimes.com/news/2015...rmation-to-con


http://snopes.com/islamic-refugee-new-mexico


http://snopes.com/irs-satan-clubs

Judicial Watch?! What a fucking surprise! Their track records are so dismal that their bogus allegations without credible stats don't mean shit. Originally Posted by andymarksman

Judicial Watch is a helluva lot more credible than you and Snopes, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. Wifey-poo at Snopes sold out to left-wing propagandists, and all hubby got out of the deal was an over-the-hill Las Vegas call girl, Andy the Little Nazi Boy. And ya wanna bet that the Washington Times wrongly reported on five or six stories in recent years, Andy the Little Nazi Boy?

Jesus, IBIdiot.

You sure got a way with words.

LMAO @ the original Dipshit of the Year!

At the very least Judicial Watch either needs remedial math instruction, or they need to get current population figures. In order for their claim that 5+ million is 144% of those 18+ years of age, they need to be using census numbers from 1960 or earlier. LA county passed the 6 million mark in 1960 and the 2010 census pegged them at 9.8 million with 24.5% under the age of 18.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fa...fornia#viewtop

https://www.census.gov/population/ce...s/ca190090.txt

At the very least Judicial Watch either needs remedial math instruction, or they need to get current population figures. In order for their claim that 5+ million is 144% of those 18+ years of age, they need to be using census numbers from 1960 or earlier. LA county passed the 6 million mark in 1960 and the 2010 census pegged them at 9.8 million with 24.5% under the age of 18.
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fa...fornia#viewtop

https://www.census.gov/population/ce...s/ca190090.txt Originally Posted by chefnerd

The math error appears to be mine, Chief Nerd. So, let us use your numbers.

The population of Los Angeles County is, as you say, 9,787,747.

If one subtracts those below the age of 18, which you say is 24.9% of the 9.8 million, that leaves us with about 7,389,749 of voting age.

Now, here's where your correction bites you in your butt, Chief Nerd.

Judicial Watch reported that the number of voters on the L.A. County's voter rolls was "144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age", which we have determined to now be 7,389,749 ... not the incorrect, smaller number I originally used.

That means the Los Angeles County voter rolls, per Judicial Watch's report, are listing about 10,641,239 voters when they should only have about 7,389,749 on the rolls, Chief Nerd.

That means there are about 3,251,490 too many voters on the rolls in Los Angeles County alone, Chief Nerd.

That's about 400,000 more votes -- in a single dim-retard California county -- than the 2.86 million vote margin in the popular vote that Assup and other hildebeest minions keep crying about, Chief Nerd.

Only in your pathetic imagination. Judicial Watch did ZERO verification and all you did is try to magically change your allegation to something even more unbelievable. Propagandists would be proud of you.

Only in your pathetic imagination. Judicial Watch did ZERO verification and all you did is try to magically change your allegation to something even more unbelievable. Propagandists would be proud of you. Originally Posted by chefnerd

Spelled it for your dumb ass using your numbers, Chief Nerd. Go fuck yourself, you ignorant POS.

No, you'd be the ignorant POS, Corpy. Now run home to your Mommy. She's clean your dirty little bottom and tell you everything's going to be OK.

.

Nobody said there is no voter fraud....the trick is not fixing the small amount of voter fraud with a huge amount of voter suppression.

We should do both expand voter participation and get rid of voter fraud


. Originally Posted by WTF

I think a cool experiment would be if we could get everyone not to vote and see who wins, lol.


Jim

I think a cool experiment would be if we could get everyone not to vote and see who wins, lol.


Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

I thought that's what happened 2016!

Didn't the Russians "pack the boxes"? Speaking of that ....

.. the Russians aren't very good a throwing elections if HillariousNoMore won!

If you want to play it that way, we did count "everybody's vote." Clinton won by 3 million votes.

A "cool experiment" indeed, you fucking RETARD!

Six months into the worst administration in history and you fuckers are still splooging over the election.

I think it's interesting that Twitler finally got to sign a piece of legislation and it was the Russia sanctions bill that tied his known tiny little hands.

We've got an uncontrollable, ignorant despot in the White House who's gonna run his latest Chief off in the next month. Congress doesn't trust him. Americans hate him.

That's the result of your "cool experiment," you fucking RETARD.

If you want to play it that way, we did count "everybody's vote." Clinton won by 3 million votes.

A "cool experiment" indeed, you fucking RETARD!

Six months into the worst administration in history and you fuckers are still splooging over the election.

I think it's interesting that Twitler finally got to sign a piece of legislation and it was the Russia sanctions bill that tied his known tiny little hands.

We've got an uncontrollable, ignorant despot in the White House who's gonna run his latest Chief off in the next month. Congress doesn't trust him. Americans hate him.

That's the result of your "cool experiment," you fucking RETARD. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You're a bona fide liar, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM. Trump had already signed more legislation than your boy Odumbo who went on a world-wide apology tour instead, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

As of 1 May 2016: Trump signed more bills in 100 days than any president since Truman

(Politifact)

"The national PoltiFact rated Spicer’s claim Mostly True, with the key clarification that none of the bills Trump has signed so far are major pieces of legislation. They added that his accomplishment doesn’t indicate that Trump has been particularly skilled at getting his agenda through Congress so far."

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA AA!