Meet the GOP Congressman whoo opposes Trump the most

What the FUCK does that mean, Bambo?

What the FUCK does that mean, Bambo? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

What the fuck do you mean? Ever? If you want to defend SnitchyVI’s ludicrous aurguments, be my guest. You’ll get trashed too. But yinz are used to it. Because you’re not very bright.

Looks like WaDA (what a dumb ass) is taking his sweet time coming up with a counter arguement

Pie chart of 'federal spending' circulating on the Internet is misleading ...
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o......g-internet-mi/
Claim: Says 57% of federal spending goes to the military and just 1% goes to food and agriculture, including food stamps.
Claimed by: Bloggers
Fact check by PolitiFact: False



WTF

Pie chart of 'federal spending' circulating on the Internet is misleading ...
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o......g-internet-mi/
Claim: Says 57% of federal spending goes to the military and just 1% goes to food and agriculture, including food stamps.
Claimed by: Bloggers
Fact check by PolitiFact: False



WTF

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

That chart was below the other chart on the link I posted. I believe Dilbert posted the same link. As Trump said about China, SnitchyVI was caught red handed. But his hands are always red trying to beat his limp dick off.

Like I said, he’s like a dog chasing his tail, but the dog is smarter. Originally Posted by bambino

What the FUCK does that mean Biner?

You are right, time will tell on Trumps but if history is any indication...



Originally Posted by WTF

I believe you are misrepresenting what this graph shows. This is showing the percentage of revenue / spending against the GNP. Since the taxes were cut and the spending was not cut then obviously the percentage would be less thus showing a greater divide between the two. Below is the total tax revenue per year from 1981 to 2012. https://taxfoundation.org/federal-ta...rce-1934-2018/

Fiscal Year Total x 1,000,000.00
1981 $599,272.00
1982 $617,766.00
1983 $600,562.00
1984 $666,438.00
1985 $734,037.00
1986 $769,155.00
1987 $854,288.00
1988 $909,238.00
1989 $991,105.00
1990 $1,031,958.00
1991 $1,054,988.00
1992 $1,091,208.00
1993 $1,154,335.00
1994 $1,258,566.00
1995 $1,351,790.00
1996 $1,453,053.00
1997 $1,579,232.00
1998 $1,721,728.00
1999 $1,827,452.00
2000 $2,025,191.00
2001 $1,991,082.00
2002 $1,853,136.00
2003 $1,782,314.00
2004 $1,880,114.00
2005 $2,153,611.00
2006 $2,406,869.00
2007 $2,567,985.00
2008 $2,523,991.00
2009 $2,104,989.00
2010 $2,162,706.00
2011 $2,303,466.00
2012 $2,450,164.00

What the FUCK does that mean Biner? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You figure it out Yssy

The dog chases the tail. But the dog, who is chasing its tail, is smarter? Smarter than the tail? Smarter than itself? Smarter than “is?” I guess that depends on your definition of “is.”

Got it.

hahahahahahahaha!

The dog chases the tail. But the dog, who is chasing its tail, is smarter? Smarter than the tail? Smarter than itself? Smarter than “is?” I guess that depends on your definition of “is.”

Got it.

hahahahahahahaha! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The dog chases IT’S tail, not THE tail. Got it?


HaHaHaHaHaHaHa

Looks like WaDA (what a dumb ass) is taking his sweet time coming up with a counter arguement Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Sorry dilbert, haven busy.

Pie chart of 'federal spending' circulating on the Internet is misleading ...
www.politifact.com/truth-o.../pie-chart-federal-spending-circulating-internet-mi/
Claim: Says 57% of federal spending goes to the military and just 1% goes to food and agriculture, including food stamps.
Claimed by: Bloggers
Fact check by PolitiFact: False



WTF

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

Many of you need to learn the difference between discretionary and mandatory budgets.

If you were to do so , you'd quit making fools of yourself.

A proper analysis would go something like this - the national debt has gone up by $19 trillion since 1980. Defense outlays have accounted for 15% of total federal spending over the same period. Ergo, 15% of the growth in the national debt (less than $3 trillion) is attributable to defense spending.

But that approach would be too rational for snitchy. He wants to whip up anti-military fervor, so he heaps 100% of the debt problem on 15% of the budget.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

Except that the current debt was accumulated by discretionary spending. Of which the military is responsible for around 65% of. Or 12. 38 Trillion dollars.

The entitlements programs so far have added nothing to the national debt as they are fully funded.

bambino is correct future outlays will not be enough in our current payroll tax system and they need adjustments.

That does nothing to fix the current problem of discretionary spending.

Like I said, many of you need to brush up on the difference between discretionary spending and entitlement spending.

To date entitlement inflow have made the discretionary spending seem like it is a smaller problem than it is because of their SURPLUS.

Except that the current debt was accumulated by discretionary spending. Of which the military is responsible for around 65% of. Or 12. 38 Trillion dollars.

The entitlements programs so far have added nothing to the national debt as they are fully funded.

bambino is correct future outlays will not be enough in our current payroll tax system and they need adjustments.

That does nothing to fix the current problem of discretionary spending.

Like I said, many of you need to brush up on the difference between discretionary spending and entitlement spending.

To date entitlement inflow have made the discretionary spending seem like it is a smaller problem than it is because of their SURPLUS. Originally Posted by WTF

Read this numbuts. Entitlement spending has accounted for more of our debt than the military. It’s just a fact.

http://www.politifact.com/florida/st...nse-are-drivi/

Read post #73 as well. Entitlements have contribute more than double to our debt than the military and will obviously get worse. They have to reform our entitlement system. Period. Can congress cut military spending? Sure. It’s up to them.

Pie chart of 'federal spending' circulating on the Internet is misleading ...
www.politifact.com/truth-o.../pie-chart-federal-spending-circulating-internet-mi/
Claim: Says 57% of federal spending goes to the military and just 1% goes to food and agriculture, including food stamps.
Claimed by: Bloggers
Fact check by PolitiFact: False



WTF

Originally Posted by Hotrod511

your politifact link is broken. here's the correct link.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...g-internet-mi/

btw, what year is that pie chart from?

your politifact link is broken. here's the correct link.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...g-internet-mi/

btw, what year is that pie chart from? Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

never mind., its based on the 2015 data according to politifact.