TRUMP officially announces re-election bid for 2020

If we a re lucky they will roll out Hillary again......bwahahahahahaha

What "will we find out"? So either way you'll be "correct"! "Hedge" much?

Unlike your predictions in 2016!

Is Trump running this year? Originally Posted by LexusLover

We will find out in November whether or not America supports Trump's agenda, so in that respect, yes, Trump is running in 2018. Just as Obama ran in 2010 and 2014. My prediction is Democrats will take control of the House but will not take control of the Senate, and may even lose a seat or two.

And your prediction for the 2018 mid-term elections is???

Let's wait to see what happens at midterms. I'm betting the Trump Loyalists don't do as well.

He scraped by in 2016. I believe there will be enough people that voted for him in 2016 that will not in 2020 solely because he has never once tried to act presidential, even a little. He may actual be primaried out and be forced to run as a 3rd party candidate.

Now, having said that, The Democrats are a bag of wet cats. If they cannot come together to defeat Trump, or another Republican in a 3 way race, given Trump is forced to run as a 3rd party, they need to call it a day. Originally Posted by grean

Presidential? What does that mean anyway? What defines (who defines) what is "presidential"? How about leadership? Trump has that and he hasn't shown us his gall bladder scar like LBJ. He hasn't done an intern in the Oval like Clinton. He hasn't bowed and kissed ass in the Middle East like Obama. He hasn't freaked out over the "attack" of a rabbit like Carter or gave gravitas to a terrorist. Lets talk about democrats and behaving presidential.

We will find out in November whether or not America supports Trump's agenda, so in that respect, yes, Trump is running in 2018. Just as Obama ran in 2010 and 2014. My prediction is Democrats will take control of the House but will not take control of the Senate, and may even lose a seat or two.

And your prediction for the 2018 mid-term elections is??? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You want a real prediction? The GOP will hold the House but lose seats. In the Senate there will be a trade off. McCaskill of Missouri will lose, Alabama will go red again, but Arizona looks iffy for the GOP, I do expect Romney to win easily in Utah, but the GOP should hold the Senate if by only a single seat.

You want a real prediction? The GOP will hold the House but lose seats. In the Senate there will be a trade off. McCaskill of Missouri will lose, Alabama will go red again, but Arizona looks iffy for the GOP, I do expect Romney to win easily in Utah, but the GOP should hold the Senate if by only a single seat. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Thanks for the response. I certainly believe your scenario could be correct. The Democrats will certainly gain seats in the House but it is a coin flip as to whether or not they will gain enough to take control. I think they will. You think they won't. We both agree that Democratic takeover of the Senate is highly unlikely. I actually see more of a Republican gain than you do.

The red/pink is Trump. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You got the red pinko Trump part right!

Presidential? What does that mean anyway? What defines (who defines) what is "presidential"? How about leadership? Trump has that and he hasn't shown us his gall bladder scar like LBJ. He hasn't done an intern in the Oval like Clinton. He hasn't bowed and kissed ass in the Middle East like Obama. He hasn't freaked out over the "attack" of a rabbit like Carter or gave gravitas to a terrorist. Lets talk about democrats and behaving presidential. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Don't forget about Reagan turning tail and running after all the Marines were killed in Beirut Lebanon!

Thanks for the response. I certainly believe your scenario could be correct. The Democrats will certainly gain seats in the House but it is a coin flip as to whether or not they will gain enough to take control. I think they will. You think they won't. We both agree that Democratic takeover of the Senate is highly unlikely. I actually see more of a Republican gain than you do. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Yep gonna be close in the House and no chance the Dems take the Senate.

If they take the House...Trumps life is going to get a whole lot harder.

I think they take it, roo many GOP candidates are already jumping ship

Yay! Go Trump! I just love the guy!

Don't forget about Reagan turning tail and running after all the Marines were killed in Beirut Lebanon! Originally Posted by WTF

Ya mean like Slick Willy did in Somalia, doncha HOVEL BUILDER ? !

We will find out in November whether or not America supports Trump's agenda, so in that respect, yes, Trump is running in 2018. Just as Obama ran in 2010 and 2014. My prediction is Democrats will take control of the House but will not take control of the Senate, and may even lose a seat or two.

And your prediction for the 2018 mid-term elections is??? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

The results of the 2018 elections IMO will have more to do with the candidates running than someone who is not, which has actually been the case in the recent special elections and runoffs.

If someone does not like Trump, or wants him impeached (same thing!), then they may cast the 2018 elections as a referendum on Trump.

Using your logic the 2016 election was a referendum on Obaminable! Two reasons: Trump ran on undoing his legacy and HillariousNoMore was Obaminable's pick, he hired her, and endorsed her as the "head person" in the Democratic Party.

But in the meantime you guys keep score on the 10-20 year old porn star fucking!

Actually, given your predictions on the outcome of the 2016 election and how fast the Russians allegedly helped Trump turn the election around to defeat HillariousNoMore in roughly two weeks (has to be scary that the Russians are that good in influencing U.S. voters, doesn't it?), then only a fool would be predicting the outcome of literally 100's of elections around the country ... so continue to be true to form and predict their results ... even before you know who all is actually going to be the candidates for voting in the Fall. (Do you really want to waste another year orchestrating an impeachment that will result in a President Pence?)

You've never ramrodded a real world campaign have you? (And I'm not talking about "most likely to succeed" or the PTA.) Wishful thinking is not a strategy, and basing one's opinion on the media hype isn't either. The race cards, gender cards, and ridiculing cards are worn out.

I'll rejoin the "conversation" later, my RW obligations with respect to gainful activities call. Otherwise, have a nice day. And since you know me so well you know what that is.

The results of the 2018 elections IMO will have more to do with the candidates running than someone who is not, which has actually been the case in the recent special elections and runoffs.

If someone does not like Trump, or wants him impeached (same thing!), then they may cast the 2018 elections as a referendum on Trump.

Using your logic the 2016 election was a referendum on Obaminable! Two reasons: Trump ran on undoing his legacy and HillariousNoMore was Obaminable's pick, he hired her, and endorsed her as the "head person" in the Democratic Party.

But in the meantime you guys keep score on the 10-20 year old porn star fucking!

Actually, given your predictions on the outcome of the 2016 election and how fast the Russians allegedly helped Trump turn the election around to defeat HillariousNoMore in roughly two weeks (has to be scary that the Russians are that good in influencing U.S. voters, doesn't it?), then only a fool would be predicting the outcome of literally 100's of elections around the country ... so continue to be true to form and predict their results ... even before you know who all is actually going to be the candidates for voting in the Fall. (Do you really want to waste another year orchestrating an impeachment that will result in a President Pence?)

You've never ramrodded a real world campaign have you? (And I'm not talking about "most likely to succeed" or the PTA.) Wishful thinking is not a strategy, and basing one's opinion on the media hype isn't either. The race cards, gender cards, and ridiculing cards are worn out.

I'll rejoin the "conversation" later, my RW obligations with respect to gainful activities call. Otherwise, have a nice day. And since you know me so well you know what that is. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Let's cover the LIES you just made about me.

I have NEVER commented on Trump's alleged affair with a porn star.
I have commented on any possible involvement between Trump and the Russians and I have said innocent until proven guilty and I personally don't think there was any involvement wit Trump personally.

Yes, I believe to a large extent the 2016 presidential election was a referendum on Obama. Electing Clinton would have meant a continuation of Obama's time in office and many voters did not want that.

But I digress and want to get back on point.

If you don't want to predict the outcome of the 2018 elections just for fun either now or in the future it doesn't matter to me. That way you can't be proven wrong. I was wrong in 2016 along with the majority of the people in this country. So what? For some reason you think it to be of major importance. I don't but if you want to continually bring it up it simply shows your character, or lack thereof.

Have a wonderful day performing your "gainful activities".

Are you two related HaHaHaHaHaHa Originally Posted by Hotrod511

What was your old handle iva biggen?

If you don't want to predict the outcome of the 2018 elections just for fun either now or in the future it doesn't matter to me. That way you can't be proven wrong. I was wrong in 2016 along with the majority of the people in this country. So what? For some reason you think it to be of major importance. I don't but if you want to continually bring it up it simply shows your character, or lack thereof.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

LL will never purposely make a prediction ... but he did say the fbi officers would go to jail in the Trump Russian probe. Which was a prediction he will now no longer admit to.

Presidential? What does that mean anyway? What defines (who defines) what is "presidential"? How about leadership? Trump has that and he hasn't shown us his gall bladder scar like LBJ. He hasn't done an intern in the Oval like Clinton. He hasn't bowed and kissed ass in the Middle East like Obama. He hasn't freaked out over the "attack" of a rabbit like Carter or gave gravitas to a terrorist. Lets talk about democrats and behaving presidential. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

He tweets like a 12 year old and I'm fairly certain if he kept his fucking mouth shut, Bergdal would be sitting in the brig at Leavenworth for at least a few years if not life.

The judge can say he could make a fair ruling but he knew that on appeal, Trumps comments would likely cause any sentence to be overturned.

As it is, men's lives were ruined searching for him and some can't walk. but Bergdal is now walking a free man.

ALL because Trump cannot shut his fucking big mouth.

His tweets constantly block his own administrations goals.

http://www.businessinsider.com/a-judge-has-once-again-used-trumps-own-tweets-against-him-in-court-2018-1

I'm not even going to bother linking a story about how his loud mouth rhetoric fucked his own travel ban.

He is definitely not the "buc stops here" type of president.

Everything is someone else's fault and never his.

That's what I mean by he doesn't act presidential.