Interesting article on pulling fossil fuel subsidies

You mean like in the form of imminent (sic) domain? Originally Posted by WTF

Try "eminent"... as in "wtf is the most eminent example of a troll on this board".

But at the end of the day you and I are in general agreement that economics drive projects. Originally Posted by WTF

Jumping Jesus! That is such a PROFOUND revelation! Thank you for sharing, wtf!

Can we also agree at the end of the day you need apples to bake an apple pie???

Really? I'm gonna keep bitch slapping you with the facts from the article. Originally Posted by WTF

For a troll, your "bait" is always weak. All you do is bitch-slap yourself. Everything in my post #6 is true. But go ahead and crop it so you can pretend to have a point. You only make yourself look like the flailing pathetic troll you truly are.

Here's my post before and after you stupidly edited it.

Before:

The article isn't about any "subsidies" to oil companies.

It's about foreign governments subsidizing the retail price of gasoline. They do that shit in shithole countries like Ecuador and Venezuela. Then after their socialist policies wreck the economy and they have to run to the IMF for a bailout loan, the IMF tells them in order to get the loan they have to stop keeping retail gas prices artificially low. When they bite the bullet, their citizens riot in the streets because they don't like paying what the rest of the world pays at the pump.

Wtf is constantly starting threads about articles he doesn't understand. That's why his sloppy thread titles don't match his links. Originally Posted by lustylad

As "edited":

The article isn't about any "subsidies"....

....Wtf is constantly starting threads about articles he doesn't understand. Originally Posted by lustylad

Are you still whining about others distorting your comments or taking them out of context? That's what you just did!

At some point I have to stop responding to you - because trolls shouldn't be taken seriously!

For a troll, your "bait" is always weak. All you do is bitch-slap yourself. Everything in my post #6 is true. But go ahead and crop it so you can pretend to have a point. You only make yourself look like the flailing pathetic troll you truly are.

Here's my post before and after you stupidly edited it.

Before:




As "edited":




Are you still whining about others distorting your comments or taking them out of context? That's what you just did!

At some point I have to stop responding to you - because trolls shouldn't be taken seriously!
Originally Posted by lustylad

The sooner you stop lying is the sooner I'll stop responding to your lies.

I suppose next you tell me again how progressive the SS tax is...

How Trump's GDP numbers are gonna be north of 4

And that if you take the last 2 years off the Trump budgeted years ,the economic dats would show Trump had decent debt to GDP numbers. But you have to keep 2020 off for sure!

Did you follow all that Pinocchio?

LL - thank You - good Sir!

Ask lustylad what Trump's final GDP numbers were.

And ask him if he knows wtf a regressive tax is.

That should take his a few weeks to distort

Jumping Jesus! That is such a PROFOUND revelation! Thank you for sharing, wtf!

Can we also agree at the end of the day you need apples to bake an apple pie??? Originally Posted by lustylad

That profound statement was followed by an article on how the economics of the Alberta Tar Sand were not panning out.

Context my lil Pinocchio, context.

Do you still think Social Security is a regressive tax? Trump will achieve 4% GDP? Or that Mexico will pay for that wall!

The traditional American way is if you have a better idea that cost less it will over ride the competition. The green deal is different, it is being shoved down our throat. Energy, transportation, and food prices will increase. The green new jobs Old Joe speaks about don't exist. A $35 an hour welder working on a pipe line is going to earn $35 an hour assembling solar panels? Anyone with just a small brain knows assembling parts manufactured in China is going be a minimum wage job at best. Good luck America old wealthy men and politicians are going to be the death of you.

And yet nobody in the media called out John Kerry for such a ridiculous statement. You are right of course. manufacturing and installing solar panels is most likely a minimum wage job and the competition from our "new citizens", will make even those jobs harder to find and YES, China will continue to dominate the solar panel market and there isn't a damn thing we can do about that other than sanctions.


https://www.miamiherald.com/news/loc...249382410.html


“Low and middle-income families are paying more on their electricity bills than they should so their wealthy neighbors can have solar panels on their rooftops,” Rep. Lawrence McClure, R-Dover, wrote to the group, citing a familiar argument.


In response, the PSC held a workshop in September 2020 to discuss net metering, in which the utilities argued that customers without rooftop solar were subsidizing those who had it.

The traditional American way is if you have a better idea that cost less it will over ride the competition. The green deal is different, it is being shoved down our throat. . Originally Posted by bill sins

Do you think the Railroads loved the idea of taxpayer funded roads steering their customers towards cars and big oil?

In response, the PSC held a workshop in September 2020 to discuss net metering, in which the utilities argued that customers without rooftop solar were subsidizing those who had it. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

That is a similar argument that public schools make about school vouchers.

Do you think the Railroads loved the idea of taxpayer funded roads steering their customers towards cars and big oil? Originally Posted by WTF

what aboutism

bahahhahahahhahhahhahahahha

what aboutism

bahahhahahahhahhahhahahahha Originally Posted by winn dixie

I'm not the one crying about green energy




Realpolitik (from German: real; "realistic", "practical", or "actual"; and Politik; "politics", German pronunciation: [ʁeˈaːlpoliˌtiːk]) is politics or diplomacy based primarily on considerations of given circumstances and factors, rather than explicit ideological notions or moral and ethical premises

'wack' off whataboutism.
typical.

'wack' off whataboutism.
typical. Originally Posted by oeb11

No advertising or solicitation in the forums oeb.

Send a PM to the posters directly if you are offering that service.

No advertising or solicitation in the forums oeb.

Send a PM to the posters directly if you are offering that service. Originally Posted by WTF

Rule #7 in debating WTF invoked: "When WTF responds with homoerotic imagery he's conceded defeat."