GREAT DAY FOR PENNSYLVANIA!!! Radical right-wing nutcases soundly defeated. I'm appalled and embarrassed that the Republicans voted these 2 idiots in the first place. Mastriano and Oz were a complete embarrassment (they were endorsed by tRump... that's why. He endorses the lowest of the low). Have fun screaming and squealing about voter fraud, lack of voter id laws, and mail-in ballots. Originally Posted by rmg_35
His speech was early morning around 12:35am. A few pauses and odd tone changes. 1 minor stumble. Otherwise it was reasonable, coherent and he was vastly more comfortable than the debate. Originally Posted by HDGristle
“We are facing big problems as a country and we need everyone to put down their partisan swords and focus on getting the job done. With bold leadership that brings people together, we can create real change.” Originally Posted by Dr.OzThis is classy. If he had played to the middle from the jump instead of just in the final week, and clearly in his graciousness in defeat I think this could have played out differently.
This is classy. If he had played to the middle from the jump instead of just in the final week, and clearly in his graciousness in defeat I think this could have played out differently.Yes it is a good statement
That said, if he legit focuses on being a Pennsylvanian, comes back a bit more towards center and runs again he very well could win. Originally Posted by HDGristle
GREAT DAY FOR PENNSYLVANIA!!! Radical right-wing nutcases soundly defeated. I'm appalled and embarrassed that the Republicans voted these 2 idiots in the first place. Mastriano and Oz were a complete embarrassment (they were endorsed by tRump... that's why. He endorses the lowest of the low). Have fun screaming and squealing about voter fraud, lack of voter id laws, and mail-in ballots. Originally Posted by rmg_35Agree about Mastriano but there isn’t anything radical about Oz other then the fake news about him. He would have done 10 times more then Fedderman will do for this state.
His speech was early morning around 12:35am. A few pauses and odd tone changes. 1 minor stumble. Otherwise it was reasonable, coherent and he was vastly more comfortable than the debate. Originally Posted by HDGristleYep. He's already mentally fit enough to carry out the duties of a first year senator, and he will continue to improve.
the only thing radical about Oz and Mastriano to democrats is that they are republicans.Well, more-so that Oz built a career being a snake-oil salesman lying to desperate people, to take their money, all while touting his statements as somehow true. Used to be that people who lie to sell a product were radical. I guess that changes if they're on your team? I know I certainly don't let my morality flex that much, but I guess others have weaker wills than me.
feel free to explain how they are "radicals".
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Well, more-so that Oz built a career being a snake-oil salesman lying to desperate people, to take their money, all while touting his statements as somehow true. Used to be that people who lie to sell a product were radical. I guess that changes if they're on your team? I know I certainly don't let my morality flex that much, but I guess others have weaker wills than me.
As for Mastriano, kind of the fact that he was in the middle of the insurrection (which by all causes and definitions was a terrorist attack, but that's another conversation) kind of makes him radical too. But again, it seems to come down to people who are willing to make exceptions for members of their team? Seems like a pretty big exception to make. I mean trying to overturn a democratic election makes him pretty radical too, but they've already done the job of convincing you that they're right so I'm beating my head against a wall.
Who knows, maybe some common sense will stain that wall and you'll consider research to answer your questionsOriginally Posted by going4itnow