Disguised OF ads on Tryst

Anyone else noticed the trend of OF ads on Tryst disguised as touring ladies? Instead of having an online only option they claim to offer incall or outcall, but they just want you to buy their content. They show a list of visiting cities, but they're not really there. They have no reviews or mentions on any of the usual sites.


For example: https://tryst.link/bdsm/mistress-cy

All ads on of providers on any platform are deceiving to one degree or another, ask any real hobbyist!

Of course all ads are not 100% accurate. So what. These are closer to scams in my opinion.

Also a slam dunk red flag for a scam is when they say you have to join/schedule through their Only Fans. I'm pretty certain that I have seen multiple posts about OF that if you mention anything about in person meeting, appointments, visits, etc. that you are kicked off and out any money you have spent. Totally agree there are a lot of Tryst scams with OF.....

I have yet to receive anything other than "bot" replies to my inquiries on Tryst. As far as I am concerned, yes, the whole web site is a scam.

AGREED INDEED! At least 90% are RIP OFF scams ...false advertising.. fake an OLD pics..GRAB-DASH get the money and RUN. When reported to Tryst ignored completely!

I have yet to receive anything other than "bot" replies to my inquiries on Tryst. As far as I am concerned, yes, the whole web site is a scam. Originally Posted by Anonymous01

AGREED INDEED! At least 90% are RIP OFF scams ...false advertising.. fake an OLD pics..GRAB-DASH get the money and RUN. When reported to Tryst ignored completely! Originally Posted by Jilge

Tryst is “sex worker friendly” which in practice means they will never take any action on scammers or fakes. Tryst has always been a joke.

AMEN to that!

Tryst is “sex worker friendly” which in practice means they will never take any action on scammers or fakes. Tryst has always been a joke. Originally Posted by SomeRandomGuy88

The OF movement has derailed this hobby in a lot of ways and will continue to make it more difficult for in person fun times especially in areas where LE are active looking to put cuffs on guys n gals who engage.

I agree ads should be up front about what is offered but the trend for some of the hotter or niche friendly content makers is they are getting paid for virtual playtime. Why get messy when you can just turn a cam on and perform then sell the same content over and over..

What I took away from this individuals post in particular is…..”HI, FOLLOW ME TO THE SLAMMER”. Truly seen? Thoroughly aligned?

Maybe…….but, NO.

- January Maye

I do not get who pays for only fans today! When it came out I subscribed to check it out and found I get the exact same content from any of the major porn sites.

What am I missing?

If any provider send me a link for an only Fans I delete our correspondence. There are plenty of providers who are willing to see me without only fans verification.

Honey, you don't seem like the guy who would get it. I just saw another comment of yours.... basically happy that women were struggling to the point of turning to providing. Thats disgusting, that the same mind frame that traffickers have. You don't sound like you see providers as human... more of a their misfortune is your gain.

I do not get who pays for only fans today! When it came out I subscribed to check it out and found I get the exact same content from any of the major porn sites.

What am I missing?

If any provider send me a link for an only Fans I delete our correspondence. There are plenty of providers who are willing to see me without only fans verification. Originally Posted by Fizley

I think the OF phase has peaked. I joined many years ago when it was still relatively new. I have subscribed to a lot of accounts but the vast majority were free. Occasionally, I would pay, usually anywhere from 5-10 dollars/month and then it was usually to a lady I knew and had seen, mainly to help her out.

Lately, I've been hit with solicitations to re-subscribe at a discount from so many gals. I use to occasionally get these offers but never to the extent I'm getting now. Maybe the bloom is off the OF rose.

As for Tryst, I see a lot of reviews from guys who weren't happy with their Tryst experiences. I still get my best times from the so-called lower tier sites like STG and LC.

The OF movement is just getting started it goes well beyond the one site. Girls are finding ways to earn without meet ups or at least in the price range most of us would be willing to pay. While I appreciate the concept for them its not good for us potential customers.

On the other side when it comes to good service it is harder than ever to get real review info so even quality providers are not given much reason to perform consistently. I enjoy virtual fun especially with girls I have seen or will visit and have been fortunate to find some that engage that way after a good session or two to keep the intensity going.

Tryst is pretty much like DoorDash you are always going to pay more than you should and seldom get what you pay for with really no avenue to pursue a remedy when the service is not up to expected levels.

One current trend that I despise but will likely become more standard is the pay to talk process where you essentially are asked to contribute in order to establish some kind of conversation that might lead to a session. This works well for Costco but you also can expect variety and value when you sign up. I think the OF movement is bad for those of us who don't live in a densely populated area that offers good in person options.

The OF movement is just getting started it goes well beyond the one site. Girls are finding ways to earn without meet ups or at least in the price range most of us would be willing to pay. While I appreciate the concept for them its not good for us potential customers.

On the other side when it comes to good service it is harder than ever to get real review info so even quality providers are not given much reason to perform consistently. I enjoy virtual fun especially with girls I have seen or will visit and have been fortunate to find some that engage that way after a good session or two to keep the intensity going.

Tryst is pretty much like DoorDash you are always going to pay more than you should and seldom get what you pay for with really no avenue to pursue a remedy when the service is not up to expected levels.

One current trend that I despise but will likely become more standard is the pay to talk process where you essentially are asked to contribute in order to establish some kind of conversation that might lead to a session. This works well for Costco but you also can expect variety and value when you sign up. I think the OF movement is bad for those of us who don't live in a densely populated area that offers good in person options. Originally Posted by DNinja69

I think many are asking people to "pay for conversation" because some men try to engage in a makeshift phone sex chat in guise of booking a session. They will text back and forth for a week pretending they're interested, all the while they're just bored and trying to get their jollies off. It's beneficial to the male but detrimental to the female.
I love chatting and getting to know new people but it gets really frustrating.