Charlie Kirk shot, another conservative assassination attempt.

Devo's Avatar
  • Devo
  • Yesterday, 10:00 PM
I don’t know the motivation of the assassin. For all I know the hit was paid for and the ant-fascist and transgender messages are there just to mislead the investigation.

My point is unless they catch the killer we may never know the truth. Maybe Kirk was boning some guys wife and this is an attempt at revenge by the husband or someone has a life insurance policy they want to collect on. Jealousy and greed are classic motivations for murder. Why don’t we let the investigation continue for a while before we start speculating. Originally Posted by txdot-guy
Seriously?

Suspect screams Incel who is likely too lame to land TS tang, let alone a hot CISGENDER female.

Likely why he is killing to defend them.

Can't get it, can't buy it, so go full Taxi Driving Deniro to save it.

What's that term? Occams Razor, the simplest solution is the most likely?

If you engrave brass cased rounds, you weaken the case walls which could lead to a stuck case, or worse the case leaking and causing damage severe enough to disable the rifle.

Further, after firing, the engraving would likely be damaged, and easy seen.

This is the mindset of killing for a specific reason, and not a professional.

So.

Go ahead and make the case that a professional killer left evidence he fabricated to lead investigators away.

Welcome to JFK 61 years later.
HDGristle's Avatar
Incels tend to flock with MAGA's. Are you saying inside job within Trumpworld? Why would they want to take out Charlie Kirk?

To distract from what? To martyr him for what purpose? He was a MAGA heir apparent and the future of the movement.
Devo's Avatar
  • Devo
  • Yesterday, 11:08 PM
Incels tend to flock with MAGA's. Are you saying inside job within Trumpworld? Why would they want to take out Charlie Kirk?

To distract from what? To martyr him for what purpose? He was a MAGA heir apparent and the future of the movement. Originally Posted by HDGristle
Incels by definition are not alpha males, which, generally define most Maga men.

Ahem...
Devo's Avatar
  • Devo
  • Yesterday, 11:10 PM
And Conservatives taking out CK, the fucks up with that?
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Mebbe Originally Posted by HDGristle

probably


On a campus that permits concealed carry Originally Posted by HDGristle



didn't know that means the college has a citizens sniper team. did you?


Incels tend to flock with MAGA's. Are you saying inside job within Trumpworld? Why would they want to take out Charlie Kirk?

To distract from what? To martyr him for what purpose? He was a MAGA heir apparent and the future of the movement. Originally Posted by HDGristle



lol the left's obsession with incels .. sounds gay to me
Tommy, your celebration of constant attempts to justify death and political violence are concerning, to say the least. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme
Lol. If you say so.

Charlie Kirk was fine and dandy with justifying gun deaths as long as they were Democrats, or school children, or gay nightclub goers. Those gun deaths were just "the price of freedom".

Well, someone out there thought his death was worth it to protect the 2nd Amendment, too. I fail to see the problem here.

Seriously, why is his death by gunshot a problem when you've demonstrated over and over again that you have no issues with the others I mentioned?
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Lol. If you say so.

Charlie Kirk was fine and dandy with justifying gun deaths as long as they were Democrats, or school children, or gay nightclub goers. Those gun deaths were just "the price of freedom".

Well, someone out there thought his death was worth it to protect the 2nd Amendment, too. I fail to see the problem here.

Seriously, why is his death by gunshot a problem when you've demonstrated over and over again that you have no issues with the others I mentioned? Originally Posted by tommy156



show us any time Kirk said it was ok to kill anyone.



we'll wait
show us any time Kirk said it was ok to kill anyone.



we'll wait Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
He most definitely said that gun deaths were "worth it" to keep the 2nd Amendment.

Are you denying that?

And so, he got caught up in his own bullshit. Tots and pears.
Jacuzzme's Avatar
He most definitely said that gun deaths were "worth it" to keep the 2nd Amendment.

Are you denying that?

And so, he got caught up in his own bullshit. Tots and pears. Originally Posted by tommy156
He happens to be right, freedom comes with risk. Cigarettes and booze cause exponentially more death than firearms could ever dream of.

Reminds me of this scene

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjqRQv7mLEw
It's simply impossible to understand the outrage over this guy getting shot when there's no outrage whatsoever over dead American school kids once a month. The hypocrisy on display in MAGA world over this is equal parts sad, disgusting and hilarious.
HDGristle's Avatar
Incels by definition are not alpha males, which, generally define most Maga men.

Ahem... Originally Posted by Devo
Nah, Charlie was a beta cuck and so are most of his followers. Same goes for Fuentes, Peterson, Shapiro, Tate and Trump.

Doesn't mean they should be killed for being fake alphas and demagogues.
onawbtngr546's Avatar
show us any time Kirk said it was ok to kill anyone.



we'll wait Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kir...ndment-1793113





lol ironic huh Originally Posted by onawbtngr546


https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comment...nd_ammendment/


Well according to him, it was worth it. So yeah, lol Originally Posted by onawbtngr546

He justified gun deaths because they were, according to him, a necessary evil that is bound to happen if everyone has a gun according to their 2nd.
It's ironic because he died from a gun death that he said was a necessary evil, while in a tent that says 'prove me wrong'


Everyone is laughing because he died from the very same thing that he said was worth it.
HDGristle's Avatar
I see all these excuses and all the blame game throughout all the comments here.

Let's all face facts from the time we had the insurrection over 4 years ago and Trump lost the election with well over 7 million votes and he tried taking over being a president by telling his followers that they need to fight and not with words if that didn't spark all the craziness that's been get on ever since you have to be kidding me.
onawbtngr546's Avatar
I see all these excuses and all the blame game throughout all the comments here.

Let's all face facts from the time we had the insurrection over 4 years ago and Trump lost the election with well over 7 million votes and he tried taking over being a president by telling his followers that they need to fight and not with words if that didn't spark all the craziness that's been get on ever since you have to be kidding me. Originally Posted by maint729

Careful, despite that being true, it doesn't have anything to do with the ironic murder of a pro-guns-at-school maga man by a gun at a school. You might score some points there though, for going off topic.


Crying tears for this fool for getting shot at a school where he advocated that some times, some people just get shot is a wasted effort.


Like crying tears for someone who refuses to wear a seatbelt because they are government control, and then they die because they splattered out their windshield at 80mph. No tears for those who think they are above us and that it can't happen to them.
Because it did.
Good fight. Now you're dead. Does it feel good? Just like you about others, we don't care about you. Hope your wife and kids get over it, just like you told other people to get over it!