Hero of the left says free speech is illegal

I B Hankering's Avatar
It don't make a fuc as far as deficit spending goes. Newt is just as big a whore as Obama!

If you think Newt is a 'conservative', you are going to have to give up your voting card!

Go to the Afgan thread.

This one is just shit talking, name calling. Originally Posted by WTF
You deflected. It was a simple question. Given a choice between Odumbo and Gingrich (or Santorum or Romney), which one will a 'conservative' vote for.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
I'd still vote for Gary Johnson.
I B Hankering's Avatar
I'd still vote for Gary Johnson. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Something like that - a protest vote - is still an option, but not necessarily Johnson. The Republican candidate will carry the state with or without my vote - so it wouldn't be a vote for Odumbo.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
It's not necessarily a protest vote. I really want him to be President. And I'd also like to see the Libertarian Party become a major party. Add to that the fact that the Democrat and Republican candidates will be very nearly indistinguishable, and the choice is easy.
Then why in this country are they in bed with the Religious Right and the military idustrial complex? A true Conservative would never bed up with those two.

You might fool yourself into thinking you are conserative but do you see how few votes Ron Paul is getting? People that vote for Gingrich or Santorum think they are Conservatives. Originally Posted by WTF
Well the military is one of the few things the federal government does better than the states would if they had militias. So supporting it and wanting it strong makes sense to a conservative that doesnt excuse the waste and corruption but its why it gets the backing it does. The Religious Right is going to wake up one day and realize we cant give them what they want or what we have been promising and they will abandon us. But then liberals havent lost minorities yet so maybe Im wrong.

Ron Paul lacks support for 2 reasons. First is his foreign policy, it just scares the shit out of people. Second hes really old, you have a legit concern that his running mate would be prez because he just died of old age.
I B Hankering's Avatar
Well the military is one of the few things the federal government does better than the states would if they had militias. So supporting it and wanting it strong makes sense to a conservative that doesnt excuse the waste and corruption but its why it gets the backing it does. The Religious Right is going to wake up one day and realize we cant give them what they want or what we have been promising and they will abandon us. But then liberals havent lost minorities yet so maybe Im wrong.

Ron Paul lacks support for 2 reasons. First is his foreign policy, it just scares the shit out of people. Second hes really old, you have a legit concern that his running mate would be prez because he just died of old age. Originally Posted by Grifter
Not only does his foreign policy suck, Paul is also wrong about returning to the gold standard and eliminating the Fed: something like 'the Fed' must exist.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 03-15-2012, 01:23 PM
You deflected. It was a simple question. Given a choice between Odumbo and Gingrich (or Santorum or Romney), which one will a 'conservative' vote for. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
A true Hobson Choice you have there my friend.

But my point is more this: conservatives are sucking a big dick and screaming that they are not gay. They very well may not be gay but they sure are sucking a big dick and have been for a long time.

True Conservatives do not really have a choice. I personally like the former Gov of La. in this election cycle. Rommer, I believe his name is.

I have always maintained that the only choice is how your tax dollars are spent , not how much. That is why I have voted towards the left. It is not because I believe these programs will work. They have proven not to but the right has it's own welfare system too. So I usually side with the poor bastards. Our form of government calles for each congressman/woman to grab as much from the government tit as possible. How in the world is that suppossed to reduce government spending with a system such as that?
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Ron Paul's foreign policy makes the most sense of anyone running. And all a return to a gold standard would do would be to give our money actual value. That is not a bad thing. The Fed is the most destructive agency in the US, it needs to be audited and disbanded.
joe bloe's Avatar
Ron Paul's foreign policy makes the most sense of anyone running. And all a return to a gold standard would do would be to give our money actual value. That is not a bad thing. The Fed is the most destructive agency in the US, it needs to be audited and disbanded. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
Ron Paul is OK with Iran having nukes and you think his foreign policy makes the most sense?

I don't think we should invade Iran and start nation building but a few strategically placed bunker busters is definitely in order.
CuteOldGuy's Avatar
Yes. By all means, let's beat every country we don't like into submission. That makes sense. If you listened to the entirety of Paul's answer on the Iranian nuclear threat, instead of what the MSM wants you to hear, you would understand.
JD Barleycorn's Avatar
This is for WTF...wtf! You said you side with the left which you say puts on the side of the poor but how do you explain the bundlers who have carted away hundreds of millions of dollars by sucking Obama's dick. They are certainly not poor and they are not disenfranchised.
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Yes. By all means, let's beat every country we don't like into submission. That makes sense. If you listened to the entirety of Paul's answer on the Iranian nuclear threat, instead of what the MSM wants you to hear, you would understand. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
let see how do eye do this...

oh yeah.

+1!!!!!!!!