Romney likes Churchil better than Abraham Lincoln

Thanks, I think. Originally Posted by joe bloe

I rest my case.

Old-T, it is just a ploy to make the usual wackos appear normal in comparison.

I think TAE and maybe also Bukkake are a potential national security risk, at least according to that article we discussed a few weeks ago, which tried to profile potential risks.

Read this and see how many boxes TAE ticks.

http://start.umd.edu/start/publicati...STerrorism.pdf

Read pages 9 and 10.

Even that report does not consider the possibility that some potential terrorists are Hitler lovers. Originally Posted by essence

In the world you'd like to live in anyone who criticises the government is a security risk to the state.

It is of course not I, but yourself, who's the real Nazi.

The British spend 2 days telling the world they're offended by Romney's comments.

Not to be outdone, American right wing buffoons spend 3 days telling the world how offended the British should be because Obama only has 1 bust of Churchill in the White House when he could have had 2. Originally Posted by Doove

Doofus, you equivocating worm, you need to lift your blinders. It was the BRITISH who were offended when Odumbo rejected the bust, and it was the BRITISH who made it an issue.

Doofus, you equivocating worm, you need to lift your blinders. It was the BRITISH who were offended when Odumbo rejected the bust, and it was the BRITISH who made it an issue.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I don't think the British in general care a toss, but maybe there was some minor civil servant or diplomat who spoke out of turn.

I don't think the British in general care a toss, but maybe there was some minor civil servant or diplomat who spoke out of turn. Originally Posted by essence

"British Press Sees Snub"


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/22/obama-returns-churchill-b_n_168919.html

"British Press Sees Snub"


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/02/22/obama-returns-churchill-b_n_168919.html Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Apparently you didn't read the article.

"The Telegraph speculated that British diplomats' pulse rates would soar, while The Times of London wondered if a shadow had been cast over the special U.S.–U.K. relationship. A spokesperson for the British embassy, though, threw cold tea on the notion, pointing out British politician David Miliband was the first foreign minister to meet with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton."

And...

"Churchill expert Steven Hayward of the American Enterprise Institute thinks the average Briton will be unfazed by the bust's return, saying that folks across the pond have always been puzzled by American fondness for Churchill."

Apparently you didn't read the article.

"The Telegraph speculated that British diplomats' pulse rates would soar, while The Times of London wondered if a shadow had been cast over the special U.S.–U.K. relationship. A spokesperson for the British embassy, though, threw cold tea on the notion, pointing out British politician David Miliband was the first foreign minister to meet with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton." Originally Posted by Doove

Doofus, you are again quite wrong. If you'll undo your liberal, rosy glasses you'll read:

"The Telegraph speculated that British diplomats' pulse rates would soar, while The Times of London wondered if a shadow had been cast over the special U.S.–U.K. relationship."

. . . and that quite supports Huffy's headline:

"British Press Sees Snub"

[SIZE=4]Doofus, you are again quite wrong. If you'll undo your liberal, rosy glasses you'll read:

"The Telegraph speculated that British diplomats' pulse rates would soar, while The Times of London wondered if a shadow had been cast over the special U.S.–U.K. relationship." Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I believe that part was included in my more extensive quote.

I believe that part was included in my more extensive quote. Originally Posted by Doove

Then you should have comprehended that it was the British press that made an issue of the matter, Doofus.


"British Press Sees Snub"

Then you should have comprehended that it was the British press that made an issue of the matter, Doofus.


"British Press Sees Snub" Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Say the same exact thing 4 or 5 more times. Maybe then you'll win me over.

Say the same exact thing 4 or 5 more times. Maybe then you'll win me over. Originally Posted by Doove

Remedial eduction is the only remedy for your persistent ignorance, Doofus.

"British Press Sees Snub"

Old-T, it is just a ploy to make the usual wackos appear normal in comparison.

I think TAE and maybe also Bukkake are a potential national security risk, at least according to that article we discussed a few weeks ago, which tried to profile potential risks. Originally Posted by essence

M'Lady, I think you are probably correct on both points.

It is of course not I, but yourself, who's the real Nazi. Originally Posted by theaustinescorts

You are one sick dude.

I think there is more written on this topic here then ever written in the whole of the British press.

Didn't you know, journalists have to file copy, doesn't mean anybody is the slightest bit interested.

We buy newspapers to wrap up fish and chips, not to read.

ps the British press has recently been more concerned about telephone hacking, and ow many journalists are going to jail. There are prosecutions, quite serious.

The Daily telegraph has some good copy, but is also full of tittle tattle, wiff waff, and right royal nonsense.

Why do we give a fuck about a chunk of shit made to look like another famous chunk of shit?

Oh, because it makes the POTUS look bad to have moved
A bust of the ENGLISH leader from the OVAL OFFICE.

My GUESS is that if he didn't remove the bust the "NAGGERS and GOP nut jobs ". Would charge Obama with...... ... Proof that he's a socialist.. Look!!! The Kenyan has a British leader in the oval office... What Abe Lincoln not good enough.? Didn't he free your people and allow you to ruin our county ?? Ungrateful welfare baby .