People can counterpoint all they want, that is not at all what I said. What I posted is that we won't get into pissing contest which is what derailed the last one and it go hijacked and closed. Nothing will be edited out so everyone can make up their own mind and choose accordingly. What I am proposing is a more civil thread where NCNS's will be posted and the ladies will have the chance to post their side without everyone piling on. The op ( in this case probably myself and DH) will simply post what has been put on the yahoo list and anyone who wants to add to in can either way. Hopefully it will be informative and helps gents make informed decisions. We won't see how it goes until it actually goes but the main goal will be to keep the thread on track and not let it get hijacked or derailed.
Originally Posted by homer13
If that is the case, I'm all for that. My only issue is with the insinuation that a couple of people would decide what gets posted and what doesn't. If it isn't censored in that manner I have no problem with it. Crap gets posted on here all the time that is 100% false, yet people read it and thank the guy for posting it. People get hurt because the benefit of the doubt always leans in one direction.
As far as the rest of your post goes I have no idea what you are talking about. Can you be more specific or are you just throwing shit out there to try and discredit something that isn't even posted yet? If you're referring to the Miss chicks I think my accusations proved to be 100% correct as they were found to be not who they said they were and all of them are now banned. If you are referring to anything else please do share and I can address that as well.
Originally Posted by homer13
As far as the other stuff, you know as well as I do that many on this board (you included) have a habit of putting things together on your own or behind the scenes or making assumptions and then posting things as fact, without anything to back it up, other than "my buddies and I have talked and we know this". I have no doubt that the "Miss" accounts were not forthcoming about who they were and were appropriately banned. I have my doubts about you being correct (though your conclusions may very well be spot on) about their true identities, but in a case like that, I don't really care and it doesn't matter one way or another. They were entertaining to me (as were your responses), not annoying enough to illicit a response from me. I do know that at least one of the lists you had in your signature regarding a certain "manager's" activities was not 100% accurate (though it did change a few times). In the past you have made insinuations regarding the same situations that were quite a stretch. Just saying "I know this is the case" does not make it post worthy, Just like my post in this paragraph saying "I know" doesn't make it anymore credible than anything you say/said.
Not trying to pick a fight. I am here for information and mostly for entertainment. My perspective on everything here keeps me from getting involved in heated arguments/discussions. It's not worth my time. Post things you KNOW, allow others to post what they KNOW, and everyone benefits. People can make up their own minds who they believe. Anyway, good luck with the endeavor. I hope the "vision" you describe is what it becomes. I guess I am just a little too cynical to think the reality will match it. Hope I'm wrong.