what in the H%^$!!! over the top

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=92643

This is completely silly, IMHO. Only will see men she is "attracted" to.

OK, lets say the following were presented to you for consideration:

Car wash attendant or auto mechanic:
I only wash or repair those cars that I find interesting/like/etc.

Photographer:
I do not take pictures of unattractive people.

Dcotors:
I do not operate on anyone whose body I do not feel deserves my time.

Dentists:
I dont "do" ugly teeth.

Teachers:
I do not teach dumb people.

I think you get the jist... I understand she doesnt want to be repulsed, but her language goes a bit far to me. Honestly, I might even understand if she was ultra-high end high dollar hottie, but that doesnt appear the case from photos/rates/etc....

Am I being silly, or does this immediately turn you off too (even if you are hot enough to make the cut)????

PiNk

p.s.- I have not tried to see her or contacted her, as I was immediately turned off by this.

I think as a provider she has every right to see who she wishes to see and not to see. Maybe shes seeking a SD or something meaningful as it seems shes looking to create a real connection with someone who is attractive to her. I do understand her not wanting to fake it, That can be a tough one. Your picky when it comes to who you want to see and spend time with, why cant we be the same way babe?

Who have you tried to contact? ... you have no reviews at all.

Plain and simple, most real world rules of business simply cannot be applied to the hobby...so it makes no sense to compare a lady's practices to normal business practices. Her body, her rules...

She is a person, doing something VERY personal for a living. She can choose who ever she wants to see. I would have worded it a bit different but if you don't like the ad, simply don't go. No need to be negative just because you dont like her ad.

You want a lineup to choose from? Go to a studio or AMP.

PS: And all those examples of yours? Any and all of them can and do say those things. I have, very rarely, turned away customers because they are assholes and not worth the time and possible trouble they may cause. I never say it that way, but professionals in all areas can and do reject customers.

I have not contacted her. I have seen many girls from eccie/aspd.
I do not review as that gives too much detail should my handle ever be exposed to anyone ;-).....

My point was that I would have passed her screening probably, but I wont/cannot go out of principle. I just believe highly compensated service industry professionals should be able to serve quality whether the guy is brad pitt or jason alexander.

PiNk

Agreed, but the client is paying,... not her.

Also, no one is mentioning the danger of sending pics upfront to providers when its possible LE (if posing as provider) could add to their case (who can argue entrapment?) if you send pics prior to meeting? Not to mention your pics are now floating around and you are not even getting the $!

No biggie.. just hate discrimination in general.
Ill pass.... Good girls with good hearts work for me...
PiNk

I am going to tone this way down because I dont want to get in trouble.

Just because of what she does does not entitle you to her services. Just becasue you have the money does not mean any of these ladies HAS to see you. You are NOT entitled to anything. And that is way you are coming off. Pouting because you cannot have the toy in the window of the store. If you felt you had to post this comment, you should have done it in the ML. Oh, thats right, you dont have access because you don't contribute to the site with reviews.

I do not know this specific lady. But at least she is honest up front. While I might have worded it differently, its her RIGHT to be able to turn away who ever she wants.

I am going to tone this way down because I dont want to get in trouble.

Just because of what she does does not entitle you to her services. Just becasue you have the money does not mean any of these ladies HAS to see you. You are NOT entitled to anything. And that is way you are coming off. Pouting because you cannot have the toy in the window of the store. If you felt you had to post this comment, you should have done it in the ML. Oh, thats right, you dont have access because you don't contribute to the site with reviews.

I do not know this specific lady. But at least she is honest up front. While I might have worded it differently, its her RIGHT to be able to turn away who ever she wants. Originally Posted by Bubba3452

No need to tone it down so I dont get in trouble, as I have no personal stake besides an opinion:
I do not care either way. I am in FAO Scwartz in Dallas. There are more toys than I can shake a stick at. I am totally fine not seeing this one and that is one reason I did not even contact her.

I agree, no lady should have to see a guy. BUT, any guys that sends his pics out to providers upfront is a totally NUTS! TOO much risk for the upside of getting to see one of 1000 Dallas providers that is not offering anything extraordinary to her competition.

As I said, I just find it humorous that guys would send pics upfront to a relatively new provider.

Bubba, surely you wouldnt send pics to girls before meeting a relatively new provider would you?

I see no reason to go on here discussing. It appears I am in the vocal minority. I just found it interesting.

PiNk

p.s.- I feel no entitlement. No woman has to see ANY particular guy. Just as this provider will not see ugly men, I will not see discriminatinating providers. To each their own.

Can we all hug this out now?

Her body and world, Her call, ALWAYS!

May be either the best or worst marketing call I have seen. Either she will get no responses, or she will get flooded with guys wanting validation that they are attractive.

We will see if the marketing changes do to economic conditions, but well, I appreciate her putting that out there, so I will not waste her and my time sending her my old, fat, wrinkly pics.

PPE

Her body and world, Her call, ALWAYS!

May be either the best or worst marketing call I have seen. Either she will get no responses, or she will get flooded with guys wanting validation that they are attractive.

We will see if the marketing changes do to economic conditions, but well, I appreciate her putting that out there, so I will not waste her and my time sending her my old, fat, wrinkly pics.

PPE Originally Posted by PurplePussyEater

Ill agree withe the above.
To each their own.
I just wanted to see if others would pass based on that alone.
PiNk

I have not contacted her. I have seen many girls from eccie/aspd.
I do not review as that gives too much detail should my handle ever be exposed to anyone ;-).....


PiNk Originally Posted by itsallpink

Too late guy, you've given any SO, divorce lawyer, or HR Rep all the ammunition they need right there. Your admission you've seen girls on this and prior boards can and will be interpreted for what it is, because no lack of detail will convince any rational person that the two of you just shared tea and crumpits.

Too late guy, you've given any SO, divorce lawyer, or HR Rep all the ammunition they need right there. Your admission you've seen girls on this and prior boards can and will be interpreted for what it is, because no lack of detail will convince any rational person that the two of you just shared tea and crumpits. Originally Posted by DFK Hunter

Somewhat, but detailed reviews are worse.... PiNk

If this is the same "itsallpink" from ASPD days, he has been around for awhile. I know nothing else about him except that he never caused any trouble that I can remember over there.

Thanks to all who decided to attack the poster and show your white knight bullshit skills to defend a mediocre looking gal nobody knows with fucked up screening requirements.

Before you go attacking people for being critical, remember that she put herself out there. It's not like the photos and info were taken surreptitiously. This is what we do: Discuss and review escorts.

3 reviews written by guys with little to no history that I have never heard of. Wants my real info and a pic of me? Fuck no. Warning flags going off big time...

Somewhat, but detailed reviews are worse.... PiNk Originally Posted by itsallpink

Nope, not enough to make one lick of real difference. I know of one case where a non registered lurker was busted through the undeleted history on the family PC. The SO's lawyer had a field day creatively filling in all those lack of details. If you are really that concerned here is what you do:

1. Disable your account and go total lurk mode.
2. Clear your browser cache after every session.
3. Buy a tool set like Norton that will clear the white space on your HD. Files that are deleted are not really deleted, the HD space the file took is now available for another file, so you want a tool that will erase the deleted file. Use that tool regularly.

That won't completely immunize you, but it will provide you a level of cover closer to what I perceive you desire, but don't really have considering your current status.