Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator didn’t score again!

Tired of having your ass handed to you, aren’t you ExNYer?

"A tax, therefore, laid by congress for neither of these objects, would be unconstitutional, as an excess of its legislative authority.” Justice Story
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You may be wrong, but you're never doubtful, are you stooge. Read the other thread for a complete rebuttal of this nonsense.

Nothing Story said about the POWER to tax has anything to do with a MANDATE to spend.

LOL! [sarcasm on] Yeah, right, BigTurd. [sarcasm off]

Like I'd trust you with anything. Bet with yourself. You'd have to be an honorable man, and you're not. You just bring up the Benji's because you can't argue like a man. Like I said, you're an embarrassment to Texas.

Run along, BigTurd, LittleMan.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Sarcasm? It is an open and shut case of the two of you are unable to prove the ridiculous statements you have been clinging to? The sarcasm claim is nothing more than a "dodge" on your part to avoid responding to the question. All you have to do is prove the previous claim that JFK, Truman and Hubert Humphrey would be modern day Republican's and you win $5 benjis. If that bet doesn't work for you, name what does. It doesn't even have to be a monetary wager. Just name what will work for you. I'm sure we can work out a deal!

You clinging to the honorable man claim is what is laughable. I certainly have both the means and the integrity to live up to my end of the bargain! The reason you are not accepting the wager is because you know you can't prove the ridiculous claim. I merely called you guys out on the statement. Nothing more, nothing less!

StupidOldFart, just answer the question. You can do so, with or without a wager. Can you prove (yes or no) the previous claim that JFK, Harry Truman and Hubert Humphrey would each be modern day Republican's in today's political climate? I anxiously await your response!

I'm thinking IB has you pegged, and you are the one compelled to post here. Just can't leave it alone, can you? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Odd thing for you to say.

COG: 15,071 posts
IBH: 6,686 posts
Me: 1,708 posts

Odd thing for you to say.

COG: 15,071 posts
IBH: 6,686 posts
Me: 1,708 posts Originally Posted by Old-T

StupidOldFart seems to do "odd" quite well!

He has a long standing tendency to not think things through prior to posting. One needs look no further than his failure to prove that JFK, Harry Truman and Hubert Humphrey would each be modern day Republicans in today's political climate to see that.

He has a serious case of "Open Mouth and Insert Foot Disease"!

Since we have all been exposed to it, I hope he is not contagious!

[QUOTE=I B Hankering;1051991769] Yeah, you are, and you are the dumb-ass poster formerly known as “Ekim the Inbred” now calling yourself “I’va biggen



Hankering the moron living in the past.

[QUOTE=i'va biggen;1051992128]

Yeah, you are, and you are the dumb-ass poster formerly known as “Ekim the Inbred” now calling yourself “I’va biggen



Hankering the moron living in the past. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You take that back! I B Lying & Crying is not a moron. Had you said imbecile, I might have agreed with you!

UUUH didn't our congress just pass a bill where the term imbecile was not to be used on the mentally challenged?But they did not rule out idiot.

[QUOTE=bigtex;1051992138]

You take that back! I B Lying & Crying is not a moron. Had you said imbecile, I might have agreed with you! Originally Posted by i'va biggen

I've got a better term for him...

UUUH didn't our congress just pass a bill where the term imbecile was not to be used on the mentally challenged?But they did not rule out idiot. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

I stand corrected, my sincere apology!

but it did feel good to say it!

You may be wrong, but you're never doubtful, are you stooge. Read the other thread for a complete rebuttal of this nonsense.

Nothing Story said about the POWER to tax has anything to do with a MANDATE to spend.
[/SIZE] Originally Posted by ExNYer

Justice Story repudiates your stance that Congress can elect to not “provide for the common defence” at § 462 in his work. Your ignorant assertion has been authoritatively rejected! Now run along like the ignorant and foolish child you are, ExNYer.

Hankering the moron living in the past. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

That’s not it at all, you ignorant fuck. You are the dumb-ass poster formerly known as “Ekim the Inbred” now calling yourself “I’va biggen” who thinks that merely changing your handle is going to remove the stigma of your demonstrated ignorance, Ekim the Inbred.

UUUH didn't our congress just pass a bill where the term imbecile was not to be used on the mentally challenged?But they did not rule out idiot. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

The only “Bill” you’ve ever worried about, Ekim the Inbred, is Slick Willie. You really suck Slick Willie’s shit up, Ekim the Inbred!

It’s crappy time for BigKoTex. BigKoTex is the second biggest repository of shit in this forum! Assup is the biggest!!! Keep sucking that shit up, BigKoTex!!! Assup has dribbled a bunch, but, BigKoTex, you’re dribbling too; so mop up after yourself while you’re at. Originally Posted by bigtex

Assup’s spastic sphincter is dribbling-blather, spouting shit and foaming spatter! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I stand corrected, my sincere apology! [/SIZE] Originally Posted by bigtex

What a “shocker”, BigKoTex!!! You’re a proponent of the “pinkie in the stinky”; which goes a long way towards sustaining your reputation as an “anal suppository”, BigKoTex.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shocker_(hand_gesture)

BigTurdLittleMan, you misunderstand. I didn't make the statement. I was trying to help you overcome your delusions. You need more help than I realized. You should save your 5 benjis for a psychiatrist. I just hope it's not too late!

Just for the record, IBCrying is a LYING COCKSUCKER! (OK, I can prove the LYING but one of you guys will have to confirm the COCKSUCKER part).

Clinton was never convicted of any sexual crimes. He was never convicted of perjury. In fact, he was found NOT GUILTY in his bogus impeachment by Newt Gingrich's hypocritical religious white lynch mob.

"In 1998, as a result of issues surrounding personal indiscretions with a young woman White House intern, Clinton was the second U.S. president to be impeached by the House of Representatives. He was tried in the Senate and found not guilty of the charges brought against him. He apologized to the nation for his actions and continued to have unprecedented popular approval ratings for his job as president."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/about/pres...lliamjclinton/

Has anybody here actually met IBCrying? I'm beginning to have some serious doubts about the "person" behind this handle.

WAAAHHHH! WAAAHHHH! WAHHHHHH!

Has anybody actually met this fucking crybaby?

[QUOTE=I B Hankering;1051993207] That’s not it at all, you ignorant fuck. You are the dumb-ass poster formerly known as “Ekim the Inbred” now calling yourself “I’va biggen” who thinks that merely changing your handle is going to remove the stigma of your demonstrated ignorance, Ekim the Inbred.



Shit IB the lame I can kick your pitiful ass under any handle you are a pushover...