Provider posted alerts: Possible LE alerts, Robbery alerts, and LexusLover (since he wants this to be all about him)

Wrong - I did not accuse or "reference" anyone or anything of substances.

It was a statement - pure and simple.

Let me know how that works out for you.

I'm finally done with this...It's boring and I will at least spare the mods from any more reading from my end..

Thanks for giving me a boner, HV!

damn....140 posts in 24 hours.

maybe I'll read them later.....

.....probably not.

maybe I'll read them later.....
.....probably not. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

Don't bother,
First post was a train wreck



and it went downhill from there

I guess that would depend on what you thinck the end goal was...

I would say we got quite a bit accomplished. Not everyone's threads can be as thought provoking as yours. ijs

[B]IEveryone on this board spends a reasonable (and sometimes unreasonable in some's eyes) amount of time trying to avoid LE. Originally Posted by Hottentot Venus

Except the OP, of course.

Except the OP, of course. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I don't think ur statement is correct. Reasonable and unreasonable are two sides of a coin, so to speak. Ur saying the OP got a third side of the coin? It's either one or the other. Ok, am just stirring the pot so I can eat more popcorn.

To get back on topic, question was asked but was it ever answered? Ok, talk among yourselves. I smell popcorn burning! Oh yeah "Squirrel!"

I don't think ur statement is correct. Originally Posted by iquit

It was not my statement. It was hers .... two of them in fact.

You know you're a special chick when you get quoted out of context in LexusLover's sig line. He does this whenever he loses a battle.

Now while I could return the favor to you ya know, because I'm cool like that, I could guarantee you it wouldn't be friendly at all, and highly inflammatory... at least to you. It would perpetuate a thought some people ALREADY have... I would hope that you rethink that stance in particular. You have until this time tomorrow before I make that decision for you, and once I do, I AM NOT TAKING IT DOWN. YOU WILL HAVE POSTERITY IN MY SIG LINE FOREVER AND EVER and that would be something considering I change mine like I change hairdos. Do you really want that?

Military ----> LE is not a far leap, especially coming from a military family.. hmm, I wonder what black men did in the 60s, 70s, and 80s to leave home, aside from going directly college or being a junkie of course. I'll let you piece that puzzle together yourself. So one is not allowed to consort with their own family members (out- state even, which makes this more humourous) because of their profession? I wonder if they felt that way about me, how would that feel? But I digress...

-----------------------------
This is interesting because it further illustrates the point of this thread...

Now here LexusLover says:
http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1056837273&postcount=74

In today's environment it can get someone executed was they approach an incall location to meet a provider whose white knight buddies don't like cops and want a notch on their belt.....or up their "respect" from the provider. I realize it's "fashionable" to bash cops ... and particularly on this board ...

but then put this in your signature on the very same board:

Hottentot Venus: 06-14-2015, 09:55 PM #70
Alerts - Houston ALL LADIES PLEASE READ.
“I have plenty of experience talking to LE, I have many close family members who are law enforcement….”

That post that he pulled that quote from is here, in it's entirety:
http://eccie.net/showpost.php?p=1056837321&postcount=75

But you don't mind putting that quote in your signature line? Why is that? Is it because I called you out for the mental chump that I think you are ( not saying you are ) therefore you don't mind putting me in what you yourself have admittedly called " a dangerous situation", or is it because that "protection" that you feel like everyone deserves only applies to those you like? OR is it those that some girls suspect are LE are the only ones who are entitled to that protection? questions, questions...

In the same post I linked above you also said this:

I will defend anyone, including you, if there is baseless, unfounded speculation about you, your status, and/or what you do or don't do (on or off this board).

So it's providers that is your concern in protecting here, the membership at large, or just strange men with weird behaviour that a provider would suspect is LE? Is that for the protection of providers here, or so that the LE that you know are here can operate unknown and unchecked. Or is it simply for the benefit of those that you like?

I'm not just ribbing you here or harassing you, I thinck that you have nefarious intentions that go far beyond the scope of any hobbyist here. OF COURSE THESE ARE MY OPINIONS.


I have no problem speaking up on and for what I and other providers feel like is a problem. I don't mind being your whipping boy, hell you could batten down the hatches and alert all the torch wielding villagers all day... it wouldn't make me flinch a bit. If WU is the elephant that shits on your parade, I'm the float that rides by afterwards to drag your ass through it.

BTW, if this is the best you can do, I wouldn't hire you to defend me in court if you soaked my thong in gasoline and lit it afire to make me.

To get back on topic, question was asked but was it ever answered? Ok, talk among yourselves. I smell popcorn burning! Oh yeah "Squirrel!" Originally Posted by kinkyorca

Indeed.

All bullshit aside:

My comments in the other thread, and the creation of this one, was for the purpose of asking why the provider posted alerts only are so vehemently attacked by this one poster, and can't we keep the alert section clear for the safety of everyone.. especially providers because we are on the front line and always targeted. The fact that this ONE person assumes the responsibility of not only being Devils Advocate (which I take no issues with) but he also clogs up the line of information in the thread with denegrating and erroneous post, and goes even further by attempting to attack and intimidate not only the original poster of the thread he attacks, but others who could have a similar story to share as well.

My inquiry in that thread when I asked you, and this one also is very simple. My request to you to at least let others get the info they need without your garbage was simple also.. you chose to respond like this and further make it personal.

I'm willing to go all the way with you and I'm not going to let it go, because this isn't about me, it's the general safety of the board and those ladies who use these sections to gauge and ensure their security. You chose, and is still choosing to throw your dog in the fight by working so steadily to the contrary of of the alert function.. Your posts speak for themselves and the one person you threw under your bus has offered you no defense and no succor, yet you still refuse to answer or refute the topic. Which is of course your prerogative so you and your intentions, whatever they are, should be brought to the forefront for others to recognize.

B/Mitch can use ignore button,,,
We didn't hire a speaker for Houston,,,

B/Mitch can use ignore button,,,
We didn't hire a speaker for Houston,,, Originally Posted by Lorde

oh the irony! You b/mitch can also use the ignore button...

and what do you mean by "we". Are you now the speaker for Houston? Keep in mind that you choose to post in a thread that I authored. You're welcome.