Well what about all the Vi pics? Before ember set things straight after 133 post bashing the mods? Maybe some ad a little bit
Originally Posted by Tsmokies
lol good to see you still on my ass?
it was my signature it was posted and noted by the MODs, and it has been resolved
So she actually saw the dude and BBBJ is a typo for CBJ.
Now I remember why I said I wouldn't get involved in these
drama threads anymore.
Dose anyone need a good used Kenwood Stereo??
Originally Posted by bojulay
Very original and on topic to bring up the Kenwood, you win the Internet today for the "I have nothing to add but will throw this in here to make people think I'm clever" category.
Very original and on topic to bring up the Kenwood, you win the Internet today for the "I have nothing to add but will throw this in here to make people think I'm clever" category.
Originally Posted by TheEccie214
Do that trick again where pigs fly out of your ass.
Posted by Tinman - So many reasons now to close this thread
Nope. She created this mess. It's all hers. I think we say..."You wrote it, you own it." Be careful what you wish for and think before you start a rant that backfires.
Nope. She created this mess. It's all hers. I think we say..."You wrote it, you own it." Be careful what you wish for and think before you start a rant that backfires.
Originally Posted by Von Spieler
It just seemed like the original issue had been resolved from the standpoint of both parties.
But the train-wreck-watching side of me appreciates your position.
So she actually saw the dude and BBBJ is a typo for CBJ.
Now I remember why I said I wouldn't get involved in these
drama threads anymore.
Dose anyone need a good used Kenwood Stereo??
Originally Posted by bojulay
And these attempts to derail this thread won't make things any better...keep on topic or find another thread of interest.
It just seemed like the original issue had been resolved from the standpoint of both parties..I know one thing here its not the first review reported by the OP to not be real.
But the train-wreck-watching side of me appreciates your position.
Originally Posted by TinMan
If the issue is resolved it can die a natural death like all thread should and usually do however there is still some value to the thread here..
The best info I got out of this and hopefully other providers that read this is to avoid this client that wrote a fake review or makes "typos".
Originally Posted by Sophia Banks
I can vouch for Cheyenne.. I have visited with him on more than one occasion. I remember him because he did bring me some itty bitty cute outfits! lol.. He was a very sweet, fun and respectful guy.. every activity on my review of me was 100% lol.. but I'm a freak like that. I'm sorry you are going through that Ember and really do not see the reason behind him writing a fake review. Maybe it was a mistaken identity? Who knows..
Edit: Ok now after reading through this whole thing.. I'm such a loser on a Friday night.. haha! What a mess.. LMAO..
Anyway, Cheyenne, I am sorry you had to go through all this just for a " typo" .. I still stand behind him being a great guy ladies!
Originally Posted by melannie_star
Update:
The reviewer finally messaged me. And texted me. And yes I saw him.
So the issue is solved - no help from the mods though in any of it!
They still haven't fixed the TYPO.
I apologize for the harassment he is now receiving from people.
Originally Posted by Ember Simmers
So first he's discredited and sworn by the provider that his review is fake but then retraction happens? By demand here the provider wanted immediate action upon the reviewer only to go back and retract! Pretty much here is the reason why the guideline exist, its perfect demonstration. Now it become a question of credibility.
...I know one thing here its not the first review reported by the OP to not be real.
Originally Posted by Mojojo
I was not aware of that, although I haven't followed along so carefully that it might have been mentioned and I just missed it. That certainly puts a different spin on things.
