DPST Gun Confiscation

You're an atheist, Moscow Mystic, that's how delusional you've become from all of your sucking. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

That’s funny IB. Hypocrisy like yours laughable. Say good night to Lollipop Hankering

That’s funny IB. Hypocrisy like yours laughable. Say good night to Lollipop Hankering Originally Posted by themystic

Sucking is all you know, Moscow Mystic.

Hey professor shouldn’t your be spelled you’re. I know you would point that out to me. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

No, I would point out YOU'RE A GUTLESS LIBERAL..YOU SURE SPEW THEIR TALKING POINTS WELL!!
LIBERALISM IS A GUTLESS CHOICE...SPELLING DOESN'T CHANGE THAT.
DON'T TELL ME YOU'RE LIKE THEDIPSTIC...LIBERAL/CONSERVITIVE & SOCIALIST/CAPITALIST...THAT WAY YOU'RE ALL THING TO ALL PEOPLE.

DON'T FORGET TO TAKE THAT FORK IN THE ROAD!!

That’s funny IB. Hypocrisy like yours laughable. Say good night to Lollipop Hankering Originally Posted by themystic

You sure talk about lollipops a lot...I know that you being the CHARTER member in the Trump Dick Suckers club is probably why.

Ignoring.

(Tee hee hee time!)

What makes you think I’ll be there...but If I happened to be in command on scene You wouldn’t get the opportunity to put a notch on your AR...I’d burn you out tough guy. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Ignoring.

(Tee hee hee time!) Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

And soon to be 47.4k of worthless #2

Caught lying again.
You don't know the difference between "All ten of the top DPST's support an AR-15 weapon ban" and "All 10 of the Democrats onstage have called for an assault weapon sales ban."
First off, no one but you and your ilk uses your double pull double throw switch name.
Why can't you just tell the facts as they were printed in the story you linked?
Just fuck it. I don't care why you lie.
Stop trying to scare people with your bullshit.
Your tall tales are proven as such by the article (you didn't read) you so thoughtfully included.



"Asked about a mandatory federal buyback of assault weapons that he has endorsed since a gunman opened fire at a Walmart in his native El Paso, killing 22 people, O’Rourke delivered one of the night’s few memorable lines. “Hell yes, we’re gonna take your AR-15, your AK-47, and we’re not going to allow it to be used against your fellow Americans anymore,” he said."

See, even Beto doesn't advocate you not getting paid for a gun you don't have. And (also in your article),

"Second Amendment rallies with organizations that try to scare people by saying Democrats are coming for your guns," Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware told CNN Friday. "I don't think a majority of the Senate or the country is going to embrace mandatory buybacks. We need to focus on what we can get done."

Coming for your AR-15? O'Rourke scrambles Dems' gun message

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...uk0?li=BBnbcA1
WASHINGTON (AP) — Beto O'Rourke's "hell yes" moment at the Democrats' presidential debate is scrambling his party's message on guns.

The Democrats have long contended their support of gun control laws does not mean they want to take away law-abiding citizens' firearms. But on Friday, they struggled to square that message with their presidential contender's full-throated call on national TV for confiscating assault rifles.
"Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47, and we're not going to allow it to be used against your fellow Americans anymore," the former Texas congressman declared during Thursday night's debate.
O'Rourke's hometown of El Paso was the site of a mass shooting last month that killed 22 people, and he has put the issue of gun violence at the center of his campaign effort. On Friday, his campaign hawked T-shirts emblazoned with his debate vow.
However, some fellow Democrats chastised him and fretted that his remarks may have made things harder for gun control supporters as they negotiate with President Donald Trump on legislation to respond to this summer's mass shootings.
"I frankly think that that clip will be played for years at Second Amendment rallies with organizations that try to scare people by saying Democrats are coming for your guns," Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware told CNN Friday. "I don't think a majority of the Senate or the country is going to embrace mandatory buybacks. We need to focus on what we can get done."
His fears about new rages against gun control supporters seem sure to be borne out.
"This is what their goal is. We've always said it, now they're saying it," said Alan Gottlieb of the Second Amendment Foundation, based in Washington state. "Now they've said it and we're going to make them eat it."
Meanwhile, Coons is working with Republican Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania on a measure to require that law enforcement officials be notified when someone fails a gun-purchase background check. Toomey, who is also working with Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia on the firearms issue, agreed that O'Rourke's comments could backfire.
© Provided by The Associated Press Democratic presidential candidate former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke answers a question Thursday, Sept. 12, 2019, during a Democratic presidential primary debate hosted by ABC at Texas Southern University in Houston. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip) "This rhetoric undermines and hurts bipartisan efforts to actually make progress on commonsense gun safety efforts, like expanding background checks," he said.
O'Rourke was less provocative in his language but still determined Friday.
"Much respect to Sen. Coons for leading the fight on background checks," he tweeted. "But the time for letting status quo politics determine how far we can go is over. If we agree that having millions of weapons of war on the streets is a bad idea, we have to do something about it."
One worry among Democrats is that calling for outright confiscation plays into claims by Trump and other Republicans that Democrats are coming for people's firearms.
On Thursday night, just as O'Rourke made his call to take back the rifles, Trump warned at a Republican retreat in Baltimore, "Democrats want to confiscate guns from law-abiding Americans, so they are totally defenseless when somebody walks into their house."
Republicans, Trump promised, "will forever uphold the fundamental right to keep and bear arms." That line got huge applause at the GOP retreat, and again Friday when it was repeated there by Vice President Mike Pence.
By all accounts, Trump needs to run up the score in rural areas to win reelection next year. The 2020 outcome is expected to depend heavily on a trio of Rust Belt states — Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — that have large numbers of rural voters, many of whom are gun-owners or sympathetic to owners on this issue. And Democrats' hope of winning control of the Senate rests on states with high rates of gun ownership, like Arizona and Texas.
Several gun control groups stressed Friday that they were not advocating confiscation, but they also didn't follow Coons' lead in condemning O'Rourke's declaration.
"I think it is very understandable that he is taking a policy position that the larger gun safety community hasn't taken and he's trying to push the envelope," said Robin Lloyd, managing director of Giffords, the gun control group named after Gabby Giffords, the Arizona congresswoman who survived a gunshot wound to the head in 2011. "If the American voter does not think this is an appropriate solution, they'll let us know."
Gun rights groups have seemed to be somewhat on their heels recently as the unabated series of mass shootings has increased pressure for new control measures. Even the staunchly conservative lieutenant governor of Texas, Dan Patrick, said he supports background checks for all gun purchases after the El Paso attack and a second mass shooting in the state. Infighting and investigations at the National Rifle Association and election wins by pro-gun-control Democrats last November have convinced some politicians that the winds have shifted on the gun issue.
Indeed, O'Rourke isn't alone. None of the other nine candidates on the debate stage contradicted him on his proposal to require owners of the two popular styles of assault rifles to sell them to the government. Two candidates — New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker and California Sen. Kamala Harris — have also called for mandatory buybacks of assault weapons. Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, asked if she agreed with O'Rourke Thursday night, allowed only that she preferred a voluntary buyback to a mandatory one.
All 10 of the Democrats onstage have called for an assault weapon sales ban, the latest sign of how the party has become emboldened on gun control.
"It's hard to overstate how much the politics of gun safety has changed — whereas candidates once avoided gun safety entirely, now they're jockeying to be the boldest," said Taylor Maxwell of Everytown, the gun control group founded by former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.
Proposals like background checks and so-called red flag laws, which allow authorities to confiscate guns from people who are deemed threats, are "urgent," she said. "Too many lives are on the line not to take these simple, broadly popular and bipartisan steps immediately."
But O'Rourke's remarks worry Democrats like Warren Varley, who lost a race for a state legislative seat in Iowa last year.
© Provided by The Associated Press Democratic presidential candidate former Texas Rep. Beto O'Rourke greets supporters Thursday, Sept. 12, 2019, after a Democratic presidential primary debate hosted by ABC at Texas Southern University in Houston. (AP Photo/David J. Phillip) "The lines like, 'We're gonna come and take your AR-15,' just play into the fears that the NRA has been stoking, and a proposal like that is just going to make rural Iowa and I think probably rural areas elsewhere more red," Varley said. "I think that's just a bridge too far for most rural folks, and it conjures up images of the government coming in and invading your home and images of big government trampling over the rights of individuals."
Trump and White House aides have discussed a number of gun control measures with members of Congress, including steps to go after fraudulent buyers, notify state and local law enforcement when a potential buyer fails a background check, issue state-level emergency risk protection orders, boost mental health assistance and speed up executions for those found guilty of committing mass shootings.
A formal announcement on the president's plan is expected as soon as next week.



As reported - All ten of the top DPST's support an AR-15 weapon ban - and they are scurying like roaches to avoid the fallout of their "Truth" - per Beto- exposed.
They lie about it - and have no idea of the consequences of such an action
The American public will not not tolerate such a Federal confiscation if the DPST's get voted into office.

Trump is approaching the issue apropriately - with background checks and dong what we can to keep weapons out of the hands of those mentally ill predisposed to such violence.
And is roundly cursed for his actions by the DPST's! Who started the mess by emptying the state mental hospitals in the 1970's for monetary reasons. Originally Posted by oeb11

trump? Appropriate? Which version of what he's said? He says one thing, the nra snaps their fingers and trump humps their leg.
And while we're on republicans humping legs, take a break from it and get yourself a spell checker. I don't give a shit what you say about grammar nazis. Wear your lack of ability like a badge of honor.
You're lying if you say your work/personal correspondence is correct. It's just your hooker board scribbles that are fucked up, right? Stop assuming no one else noticed except me.
More people than just me think you're uneducated.

Caught lying again.
You don't know the difference between "All ten of the top DPST's support an AR-15 weapon ban" and "All 10 of the Democrats onstage have called for an assault weapon sales ban."
First off, no one but you and your ilk uses your double pull double throw switch name.
Why can't you just tell the facts as they were printed in the story you linked?
Just fuck it. I don't care why you lie.
Stop trying to scare people with your bullshit.
Your tall tales are proven as such by the article (you didn't read) you so thoughtfully included.



"Asked about a mandatory federal buyback of assault weapons that he has endorsed since a gunman opened fire at a Walmart in his native El Paso, killing 22 people, O’Rourke delivered one of the night’s few memorable lines. “Hell yes, we’re gonna take your AR-15, your AK-47, and we’re not going to allow it to be used against your fellow Americans anymore,” he said."

See, even Beto doesn't advocate you not getting paid for a gun you don't have. And (also in your article),

"Second Amendment rallies with organizations that try to scare people by saying Democrats are coming for your guns," Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware told CNN Friday. "I don't think a majority of the Senate or the country is going to embrace mandatory buybacks. We need to focus on what we can get done."







trump? Appropriate? Which version of what he's said? He says one thing, the nra snaps their fingers and trump humps their leg.
And while we're on republicans humping legs, take a break from it and get yourself a spell checker. I don't give a shit what you say about grammar nazis. Wear your lack of ability like a badge of honor.
You're lying if you say your work/personal correspondence is correct. It's just your hooker board scribbles that are fucked up, right? Stop assuming no one else noticed except me.
More people than just me think you're uneducated. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

For gawdsake hurry up and pass out. How does your keyboard stand up to the puking?

Caught lying again.
You don't know the difference between "All ten of the top DPST's support an AR-15 weapon ban" and "All 10 of the Democrats onstage have called for an assault weapon sales ban."
First off, no one but you and your ilk uses your double pull double throw switch name.
Why can't you just tell the facts as they were printed in the story you linked?
Just fuck it. I don't care why you lie.
Stop trying to scare people with your bullshit.
Your tall tales are proven as such by the article (you didn't read) you so thoughtfully included.



"Asked about a mandatory federal buyback of assault weapons that he has endorsed since a gunman opened fire at a Walmart in his native El Paso, killing 22 people, O’Rourke delivered one of the night’s few memorable lines. “Hell yes, we’re gonna take your AR-15, your AK-47, and we’re not going to allow it to be used against your fellow Americans anymore,” he said."

See, even Beto doesn't advocate you not getting paid for a gun you don't have. And (also in your article),

"Second Amendment rallies with organizations that try to scare people by saying Democrats are coming for your guns," Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware told CNN Friday. "I don't think a majority of the Senate or the country is going to embrace mandatory buybacks. We need to focus on what we can get done."
Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Interesting but not unexpected leftist spin on things there.

When O’Rourke delivered his line, the other candidates all basically gave a resounding 'here here' to Beto. Beto specifically used the words "take your AR-15, your AK-47". And nearly universal agreement on the stage. Go ahead and slink back to their campaign positions, but on stage that night they all seemed pretty accepting of the confiscation that Beto proposed.

And what part of "mandatory" do you not understand in your spin. Trying to couch that as some higher level of action when you're not given a choice in the matter is laughable. It's still confiscation. It's like the bullshit eminent domain rules where you can lose your house/property to the state at pennies on the dollar without a choice in the matter. Luckily, the right to bear arms is a protected Second Amendment right. And even when the sales bans were in place, existing firearms were not confiscated.

But I do agree that Chris Coons statement was at least level headed. Whatever you lefty gun confiscation nuts with threats of police and National Guard intervention say, it's not going to be met well by the Senate or the country in general.

I would think we are more likely to give up our ammo first - at the rate of about 3,128 FPS.

Give them up or hit the streets tough guy. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Hope that helps educate you.

the nra snaps their fingers and trump humps their leg. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

We’ll see, won’t we, buddi! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You'll see. Real Americans already know whats going to happen, lol.

Jaxxon...


am I reading you right, you would give up your arms if a law was passed to ban firearms?

He and MM would - as long as they could get a lecture from H.... - whose name must not be mentioned!

You guys are drifting.
So what's next after guns?

My questions are:
If axes are outlawed, how can Jason star in another movie? And, what will hotel managers use to open doors?
If bows and arrows are outlawed, what happens to Robin Hood? Or, what happens to most of the folks in the middle earth saga?
If plastic dolls are outlawed, how can Chucky resurrect?
If long fingernails are outlawed, will Freddie get upset? (I know I will cause a gal running her nails accross my back gets me to smile)
And of course:
No more chain saws for the Texans
No more long knives in motels

Seriously, I fear the dearth of the classic weapons resulting no future horror films.