Don't play with me Ike, you know that I was informed that was his 1st name in pm by yall before y'all ban me.. I just had moved here from SA, so didn't know shyt about him.
When I got back I apologized, sent him a link(Urban dictionary) to clear up the misunderstanding, and got another 7day ban. Pull that link up while you're at it. They need all the missing pieces.
I put 1 word up not 2.. If it really had anything to do with outing would've been 2 words 1st, and last that's connecting .. Straight from a mods mouth.. Ive also made myself clear, I apologized because thats what grown folks do, y'all said I did it, but y'all lied once again.. I can pull links when y'all had to clean up, from mojo saying you can put partial info anyways, because a girl put 1st, last, and middle name. Y'all took out the middle name, left 1st and last she didn't get ban..
This thread is not about me, it's about P case on outting.. You don't think folks can see what you doing trying to change the topic..?
Originally Posted by Champagne Brown
Getting the thread back on topic and stopping the violations that are going on in this thread.
That was posted to clear up any misconceptions with the responses to wakeup's post concerning YOU outing him....more than once.
You are being asked again to allow staff to clear this situation up and get back to you. If you and the chorus of two continue to make speculation and accusations in this thread against staff in any way, it will be assessed as a violation.
Originally Posted by SOULMANIKE
Admitting to posting a member's first name=Admitting to outting that member
It doesn't matter how,when,where or why you did it
It's that simple
If your receipts check out,she will get banned
You can forward your evidence to every mod and admin on this site and the end will be the same
There isn't favoritism when it comes to nuclear violations
Originally Posted by Prince Akeem Of Zamunda
What defines outting here? Certainly not terms pieced into the guideline provided by this site. The pure definition in the guideline is either NOT followed willfully or by selective inferred meaning and not by the exact legal definitions of the terms used in the Guideline. I do belive there is favoritism. It's a natural part of humanity. It is certainly alive and well here in this microcosm.
I agree CB should drop the arguement re: did she or didnt she? That whole discussion is completely irrelevant to this thread's topic. I also agree that Ike has no official business commenting on that topic. He does so as a private citizen, however, I strongly suggest all claimants refrain from any further posts for at least 48 hours, which is more than ample time for this matter to be resolved but to whos liking.
Stop and breath. Suck a dick. Go shopping. Just dont type. This needs time.