CRT and no I don't mean Cathode Ray Tube

Getting America ready for reparations. Thats the end game here.

Sometimes a pic is worth over 1,000 words.

This is the reality of CRT - it is a racist , socialist tool of the DPST/fascist party to further divide America along racial lines.
CRT promotes racism, segregation, and racial hatred.

and devotees of the CRT promoting DPST/fascist party are useful dupes of those using it to destroy America as a melting pot country. Originally Posted by oeb11

Quote:
Originally Posted by oeb11

The rest of your post is just fascist DPST anti-white racism - false labelling of people and mostly incorrect history.

Typical.
and no - you are not a physician.

Comment in response - 'a' - You forget or ignore the evil things that the KKK did to folks in the deep south after the Civil war was over. The KKK killed white and black freedom riders in the 1960's.

You are not the only person on ECCIE.NET that has passed an Organic Chemistry class.


Comment in response - oeb11- deflection and delusion over the issue -'a'
If you passed organic chemistry in a college class - good for U.
That does not make You either a physician or Scientist
you are, as usual, incorrect as to what I do , or do not,forget/ ignore.

No reputable physician or scientist would make the mistake of speaking for others.

'a' - you also NOT a telepath.



KKK - was a Democrat racist organization :
Founded in 1865, the Ku Klux Klan (KKK) extended into almost every southern state by 1870 and became a vehicle for white southern resistance to the Republican Party’s Reconstruction-era policies aimed at establishing political and economic equality for Black Americans. Its members waged an underground campaign of intimidation and violence directed at white and Black Republican leaders. Though Congress passed legislation designed to curb Klan terrorism, the organization saw its primary goal–the reestablishment of white supremacy–fulfilled through Democratic victories in state legislatures across the South in the 1870s.
After a period of decline, white Protestant nativist groups revived the Klan in the early 20th century, burning crosses and staging rallies, parades and marches denouncing immigrants, Catholics, Jews, African Americans and organized labor. The civil rights movement of the 1960s also saw a surge of Ku Klux Klan activity, including bombings of Black schools and churches and violence against Black and white activists in the South.
https://www.history.com/topics/recon...n/ku-klux-klan




But after all - LSM teaches minions that 'history' is racist, and should be changed to fit the fascist DPST political narrative.

Getting America ready for reparations. Thats the end game here. Originally Posted by Submodo

i fully support reparations! the only question .. how much does the black race owe itself for selling their own into slavery?


BAHHAHAAA

'a' - i assume you are a white male


if so - CRT makes you an incorrigible 'racist' by the nature of your Caucasian race.

CRT forces racism on people by the color of their skin.

and you cannot see how damaging to America such nonsense and fascist DPST 'racism' is to the Peoples of America.



Quotes from Martin Luther King Jr. - The function of education is to teach one to think intensively and to think critically. Intelligence plus character – that is the goal of true education.


Rarely do we find men who willingly engage in hard, solid thinking. There is an almost universal quest for easy answers and half-baked solutions. Nothing pains some people more than having to think.


I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality… I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word.


I have a dream that one day little black boys and girls will be holding hands with little white boys and girls.


I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.


When we let freedom ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God’s children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, ‘Free at last! Free at last! Thank God Almighty, we are free at last!’


10 Facts About Martin Luther King Jr.

1. Martin Luther King Jr. skipped two grades in high school, 9th and 11th, and entered college (Morehouse College) at the age of 15 in 1944. By 19, he received a bachelor’s degree in sociology.
2. His honeymoon was spent at a funeral parlor. This was not because someone died, simply because a friend owned the parlor and offered to let him use it for his honeymoon.
3. His house was once bombed. This was during the Montgomery Bus Boycott, which lasted 385 days.
4. Martin Luther King Jr.’s autopsy revealed that stress had taken a major toll on his body. Despite being only 39 when he passed away, one of his doctors noted that he had “the heart of a 60 year old”.
5. Today over 700 streets in the Unites States are named after Martin Luther King Jr. There is one such street in almost every major city.
6. King’s “I Have a Dream” speech was not his first at the Lincoln Memorial.
7. King narrowly escaped an assassination attempt a decade before his death.
8. Members of King’s family did not believe James Earl Ray acted alone.
9. King’s mother was also slain by a bullet in 1974.
10. George Washington and Abraham Lincoln are the only other Americans to have had their birthdays observed as a national holiday (now combined as Presidents Day).

Martin Luther King Jr. inspired the human race to strive for harmony among all people. His tragic death shocked the nation, but his words and his dedication to equality continue to inspire younger generations.
We hope these famous Martin Luther King Jr. quotes lift your heart and spirit.

The spirit of teh man who helped advance the cause of teh 1964 Voting rights and Civil Rights Acts - had been discarded by the racist ideology of CRT of teh Democrat party.

They have stomped into the ground the revered spirit of Martin Luther King, Jr.

I pray that his spirit will Overcome the Racism of teh DPST party, their teacher's unions, and let us come together for a better, united America - rather than a divided America which defines people by their skin color as 'racist'!

MLK's spirit has prevailed and will continue to prevail.

Please don't allow a handful of loudmouths deceive you into believing that this country is going to stand still while some hooligans throw tantrums until they get .... errr.... "their way"???

No, LBJ had to cut a deal with Senator Dirksen so that the Filibuster would not be used by Republican Senators to block the civil rights bill. Nice try though. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Wow! You don't give up, do you?

Is your sense of shame at the long, deep racist history of the dim-retard party so intense that it compels you to lie and clumsily attempt to rewrite the history of the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

That's truly pathetic.

Let's see what the OFFICIAL US SENATE WEBSITE has to say about all this.

First, Republican Senators did NOT use (or threaten to use) the Filibuster - it was your dim-retard heroes, led by former KKK Klaven recruiter and Exalted Cyclops Robert Byrd, who did that! Byrd is the same KKK leader Joe Biden eulogized and praised at his funeral in 2010.

"The filibuster that threatened to derail the civil rights bill in 1964 was not led by the opposition party, but by an opposing faction within the majority party. To invoke cloture on the civil rights bill, Democratic proponents of the bill needed strong Republican support."

Second, Senator Dirksen hardly needed to "cut a deal" with LBJ. According to the official US Senate version of what happened, he was motivated by a desire to "to preserve the legacy inherited from the Great Emancipator". This inspiring high-minded motive guided him as he fended off strong political pressures in an election year and delivered the votes without which the CRA could not have been passed and signed into law.

"This presented Everett Dirksen with a dilemma. It was a presidential election year and, as one historian commented, Dirksen was asked “to deliver Republican votes in support of a Democratic president who could not bring along enough of his own party to seal the deal.” As the long civil rights debate unfolded, it did so with the backdrop of presidential primaries. The last thing the Senate’s Republican leader should be doing, many argued, was to provide the Democratic administration with a major legislative victory, but Dirksen, a proud Republican from the Land of Lincoln, was determined to preserve the Republican legacy inherited from the Great Emancipator."

https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory...nalpassage.htm


Those are the facts, dude. Get over it.

If your shame is so great that you have to cover up and lie about your party's sordid history, maybe it's time for you to change your political affiliation.

LL and LL - thank You, Good Sirs!
Well written

Wow! Is your sense of shame at the long, racist history of the dim-retard party so intense that it compels you to lie and clumsily try to rewrite the history of the 1964 Civil Rights Act?

You are truly pathetic.

Let's see what the OFFICIAL US SENATE WEBSITE has to say about all this.

First, Republican Senators did NOT use (or threaten to use) the Filibuster - it was your Southern dim-retard heroes who did that! Originally Posted by lustylad

butt butt Barry "Big Ears" Soetoro said filibusters are "racist Jim Crow" tactics. who knew he was talking about his own party?





BAHHAAAHAAAAA

Wow! You don't give up, do you?


Those are the facts, dude. Get over it.

If your shame is so great that you have to cover up and lie about your party's sordid history, maybe it's time for you to change your political affiliation. Originally Posted by lustylad

The dixiecrats were a wing of the democratic party. They were like the Tea Party of the Republican party. There were plenty of republicans that did not support the civil rights bill. From your link:

On the other hand, staunch conservatives like Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa fought Dirksen every step of the way. Dominating the GOP caucus, many conservatives believed the civil rights bill represented an unprecedented intrusion by the state into the daily lives of Americans.

The dixiecrats were a wing of the democratic party. They were like the Tea Party of the Republican party. There were plenty of republicans that did not support the civil rights bill. From your link:

On the other hand, staunch conservatives like Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa fought Dirksen every step of the way. Dominating the GOP caucus, many conservatives believed the civil rights bill represented an unprecedented intrusion by the state into the daily lives of Americans. Originally Posted by adav8s28

also from lustylad's post ...


Wrong! How many times do I need to correct this lie? And why do you keep repeating it over and over again after it has been debunked? One more time... A higher proportion of Republicans than Democrats voted for the CRA in both the House and the Senate. The bill could never have been passed without this disproportionate Republican support. Here is the voting record:

Civil Rights Act of 1964 roll call vote breakdown by numbers:

House of Representatives:
Democrats for: 152
Democrats against: 96
Republicans for: 138
Republicans against: 34

Senate:
Democrats for: 46
Democrats against: 21
Republicans for: 27
Republicans against: 6

% of Republican Reps voting for: 80%
% of Democrat Reps voting for: 61%

% of Republican Senators voting for: 82%
% of Democrat Senators voting for: 69%


are ya gonna deny this is the full and accurate vote? tells a different story than what the far left radical media has told you doesn't it?


yes it does

The dixiecrats were a wing of the democratic party. They were like the Tea Party of the Republican party. There were plenty of republicans that did not support the civil rights bill. From your link:

On the other hand, staunch conservatives like Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa fought Dirksen every step of the way. Dominating the GOP caucus, many conservatives believed the civil rights bill represented an unprecedented intrusion by the state into the daily lives of Americans. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Still arguing about what happened 57 years ago as if it has any relevance at all to what is happening right now. SMH



But hey, what ever floats your boat. Carry on.

Still arguing about what happened 57 years ago as if it has any relevance at all to what is happening right now. SMH

But hey, what ever floats your boat. Carry on. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Heck, I want him to go back much further and admit the Democrats are the party of slavery, Jim Crow, KKK, lynching, discrimination and all manner of racial sins!

It's relevant today because their unwillingness to confront this sordid history drives them to project their guilt onto the party that freed the slaves and passed the Civil Rights Act. This is poisoning our politics. Dim-retards are now over-compensating for their guilty consciences by pushing bullshit like CRT on everyone.

ada is oinking too much.

lots of republicans voted against the CR1964 bill? sure......

35/6 no votes is not alot.

LBJ is the master of the short squeeze deal making. if there is to be deal making to be had, it was on the democrat side. he had to do some arm twisting to get that passed. 60% is pretty lukewarm for the bill.

Heck, I want him to go back much further and admit the Democrats are the party of slavery, Jim Crow, KKK, lynching, discrimination and all manner of racial sins!
Originally Posted by lustylad

Dixiecrats were the party of Jim Crow, KKK, Lynching etc. Dixiecrats and Democrats are two different things. Was John F. Kennedy a dixiecrat? No. Before Strom Thurman joined the REPUBLICAN party he was in the dixiecrat party. America's number one Segregationist was in the Republican party in 1964. He also filibusterd against the Civil rights bill as a REPUBLICAN. If there is anyone who is trying to rewrite history it's you.

From the link:

A staunch opponent of Civil Rights legislation in the 1950s and 1960s, Thurmond conducted the longest speaking filibuster ever by a lone senator, at 24 hours and 18 minutes in length, in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1957.[2] In the 1960s, he voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Despite his support for racial segregation, Thurmond always denied the accusation that he was a racist by insisting he was a supporter of states' rights and an opponent of excessive federal authority.[3] Thurmond switched parties ahead of the 1964 United States presidential election, saying that the Democratic Party no longer represented people like him, and endorsed Republican nominee Barry Goldwater, who also opposed the Civil Rights Act.[4][5].


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond

Dixiecrats were the party of Jim Crow, KKK, Lynching etc. Dixiecrats and Democrats are two different things. Was John F. Kennedy a dixiecrat? No. Before Strom Thurman joined the REPUBLICAN party he was in the dixiecrat party. America's number one Segregationist was in the Republican party in 1964. He also filibusterd against the Civil rights bill as a REPUBLICAN. If there is anyone who is trying to rewrite history it's you.

From the link:

A staunch opponent of Civil Rights legislation in the 1950s and 1960s, Thurmond conducted the longest speaking filibuster ever by a lone senator, at 24 hours and 18 minutes in length, in opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1957.[2] In the 1960s, he voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Despite his support for racial segregation, Thurmond always denied the accusation that he was a racist by insisting he was a supporter of states' rights and an opponent of excessive federal authority.[3] Thurmond switched parties ahead of the 1964 United States presidential election, saying that the Democratic Party no longer represented people like him, and endorsed Republican nominee Barry Goldwater, who also opposed the Civil Rights Act.[4][5].


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_Thurmond Originally Posted by adav8s28

you just will not give up with this nonsense will ya? the DEMOCRATS founded the KKK right after the Civil War which happens to be decades before Thurmond was even born.

what party was Thurmond a member of when he was elected Governor of South Carolina in 1946?

well let's see..


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strom_...South_Carolina


Running as a Democrat in a virtually one-party state, Thurmond was elected Governor of South Carolina in 1946, largely on the promise of making state government more transparent and accountable by weakening the power of a group of politicians from Barnwell,[16] which Thurmond dubbed the Barnwell Ring, led by House Speaker Solomon Blatt.


the dixiecrats were a splinter group of the DEMOCRATIC party. the party that founded the KKK. the DEMOCRATS today are the party of CRT.

for the hundredth time .. name me ONE other former Democrat/Dixiecrat politician who joined the Republican party.


we'll wait ..