Ya I'm gonna open myself up to the firing squade here but hey, I really want the feedback.

This had to be the single most ignorant statement I have read on this thread.

WALDT but generalizing like this when so many cultures in and outside the US put curves on a pedestal? Originally Posted by Boltfan

Not talking about cultures outside the United States, don't know enough about them, and don't care to, and also don't think they in any way apply to this argument.

There are plenty of sexual fetishes/abnormalities. Some men like women with smelly pussies, watching their significant other's get pounded by men with larger penises than they have and then licking up the other guy's gloop, pissing and shitting on one another, and overweight women. This does not mean that any of these things represent ideal, typical, or even frequently occurring preferences.

Look at the ads that pop up on this website and those like it. And I mean sponsored ads, that people pay more than 10 bucks a pop for. You'll see fit, athletic, alluring women. Not fatties.

In this city you have options like this chick !VI! and Tara Evans. These are women who I would be willing to bet attract the most attention/interest. What do they have in common? They're physically fit, well-above average looking females. That's it.

Actually !VI! Has a valid point. I have seen woman who were good from far but far from good up close. WALDT certainly applies but so does biology. I have seen studies referenced online that show women consistently over estimated how thin men want them to be. What many men all around the world are really attracted to is a shape or ratio. Curvy with a waist that is a ratio of about 60 % of the hips. I think THN falls into that category so maybe that's why so many guys agree she is sexy ? Here is an article from Psycology Today that talks about the ratio. It's a little long but very interesting.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/arti...eternal-curves

First off, I must disclaim that THN left me walking with a limp. That said:

My opinion is, with respect to "BBW" there's a difference between baby fat, large but fit, and sloppy fat.

If her ass looks like the hood of my truck after a hail storm, we're not talking BBW.

Superficial as this is there's no room to judge how a woman got into whatever shape she presents.

Actually !VI! Has a valid point. I have seen woman who were good from far but far from good up close. WALDT certainly applies but so does biology. I have seen studies referenced online that show women consistently over estimated how thin men want them to be. What many men all around the world are really attracted to is a shape or ratio. Curvy with a waist that is a ratio of about 60 % of the hips. I think THN falls into that category so maybe that's why so many guys agree she is sexy ? Here is an article from Psycology Today that talks about the ratio. It's a little long but very interesting.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/arti...eternal-curves Originally Posted by playerplano

i've read this before, but i don't think the ratio is accurate in this case all things considered, but it's a to each their own thing. the reason that number is so high now, is because some people are just too lazy to try to be in better health...

with as much a some people spend on the hobby each month... a portion of that could be used to help extend their lifes or get in shape. Some people are Husky ... but that's not fat... no matter what position i'm in i can tell hat kind of shape you are in....and the reverse is also true.


i know for a fact, that many people watch the way i move to admire the hard work i put behind my art and body....

also on that note, you usually don't go pay for the samething you have at home

First off, I must disclaim that THN left me walking with a limp. That said:

My opinion is, with respect to "BBW" there's a difference between baby fat, large but fit, and sloppy fat.

If her ass looks like the hood of my truck after a hail storm, we're not talking BBW.

Superficial as this is there's no room to judge how a woman got into whatever shape she presents. Originally Posted by Poppa_Viagra

that... was kinda strong, but yu have seen her, so you are probably a better voice then many WKs atm


how many of her WKs have actually taken the dive? better question. how many nursians have had her on the to-do list longr then 2 years, but have seen other providers in the mean time?


just saying, i butchered my reputation for very good reasons, it's a wonderful learning experience, now i people will only see me if they really ant to not the hype. which creates a betteer experience... i don't have to ask what catagory i'm in

i'm just a younger version of Tara atm, and i will work to stay in this shape until i'm in my mid 40s

Not talking about cultures outside the United States, don't know enough about them, and don't care to, and also don't think they in any way apply to this argument.

There are plenty of sexual fetishes/abnormalities. Some men like women with smelly pussies, watching their significant other's get pounded by men with larger penises than they have and then licking up the other guy's gloop, pissing and shitting on one another, and overweight women. This does not mean that any of these things represent ideal, typical, or even frequently occurring preferences.

Look at the ads that pop up on this website and those like it. And I mean sponsored ads, that people pay more than 10 bucks a pop for. You'll see fit, athletic, alluring women. Not fatties.

In this city you have options like this chick !VI! and Tara Evans. These are women who I would be willing to bet attract the most attention/interest. What do they have in common? They're physically fit, well-above average looking females. That's it. Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

well thank you ^.^

but i'm still not in my Best Shape, i could do a bit better with my diet but i do work hard to avoid falling out of the FIT category, but i believe my physical health go hand and hand to my enjoyment of sex... so that's just me

So I missed where this derailed and became not about THN. I don't do fat chick threads, or chubby threads. But I'll do this one.

To me size discussion should be about density, not overall quantity. Give me a solid girl like THN who might not be a size 2, but doesn't jiggle except where it's important, no BBW, because she may be beautiful, but she ain't that big. Curvy? Maybe an old school word like ample? Okay.

Even larger women, height wise, who are solid are big, and beautiful. All the BBW, little BBW, short BBW, that connotation right there says cellulite and French fries riding on their thighs. I know it's a fine line, but BBW and fat chicks are synonymous, PC or not. A belly roll (or two) that could wear one or two more bras, that's BBW. She may have the face of an angel but if she has an ass like a kiddie pool full of cottage cheese? BBW.

THN has none of that, so BBW, pick your modifier, is bullshit in a conversation about her. Just my .02. No WK, just I'm tired of dancing around the body type nonsense. All you fat chicks that want to bust me for saying that shit, blow me.

Not talking about cultures outside the United States, don't know enough about them, and don't care to, and also don't think they in any way apply to this argument.

There are plenty of sexual fetishes/abnormalities. Some men like women with smelly pussies, watching their significant other's get pounded by men with larger penises than they have and then licking up the other guy's gloop, pissing and shitting on one another, and overweight women. This does not mean that any of these things represent ideal, typical, or even frequently occurring preferences.

Look at the ads that pop up on this website and those like it. And I mean sponsored ads, that people pay more than 10 bucks a pop for. You'll see fit, athletic, alluring women. Not fatties.

In this city you have options like this chick !VI! and Tara Evans. These are women who I would be willing to bet attract the most attention/interest. What do they have in common? They're physically fit, well-above average looking females. That's it. Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

You are translating your personal preference to a rash generality.

You are translating your personal preference to a rash generality. Originally Posted by Boltfan

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so there is no right or wrong answer, other than at least her pics are current. They are not old and/or photo shopped like many other provider showcase pics are.

You are translating your personal preference to a rash generality. Originally Posted by Boltfan

There's more than one reason why this is wrong, I'll just point out the easiest to understand.

I have barely scratched the surface of my personal preferences in my responses. This hook asked for opinions on her appearance based upon posted photos. That's essentially an invitation to anyone so inclined to post brutally insulting characterizations.

I've been really, really restrained.

The chick is a big, big girl. If you like that, super. My preference would be for females like this to actually become the accepted standard. This way, the market for females who are physically fit and low in adipose tissue would shrink, and they'd become more easily available and less expensive.

But that's not the way it is.

I suppose it's possible that on some African plain or in a South American jungle there's an entire civilization that worships pygmy women and thinks people like myself are out of our minds for preferring slimmer women, or at least those who maintain the basic shape of human beings, for sexual pleasure. I'm equally sure there's a subspecies of human beings somewhere out there who like the smell of their own farts and the taste of their own shit?

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder and so there is no right or wrong answer, other than at least her pics are current. They are not old and/or photo shopped like many other provider showcase pics are. Originally Posted by davidfree986

It's ok, we know what you like David

There's more than one reason why this is wrong, I'll just point out the easiest to understand.

I have barely scratched the surface of my personal preferences in my responses. This hook asked for opinions on her appearance based upon posted photos. That's essentially an invitation to anyone so inclined to post brutally insulting characterizations.

I've been really, really restrained.

The chick is a big, big girl. If you like that, super. My preference would be for females like this to actually become the accepted standard. This way, the market for females who are physically fit and low in adipose tissue would shrink, and they'd become more easily available and less expensive.

But that's not the way it is.

I suppose it's possible that on some African plain or in a South American jungle there's an entire civilization that worships pygmy women and thinks people like myself are out of our minds for preferring slimmer women, or at least those who maintain the basic shape of human beings, for sexual pleasure. I'm equally sure there's a subspecies of human beings somewhere out there who like the smell of their own farts and the taste of their own shit? Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

You are missing the point, so nevermind.

I saw THN a dozen times so I'm no WK and I speak from experience.

She is wicked cute and an awesome BCD experience.

I don't care what you call her body type.

she doesn't seem like a BBW to me but she has some chubby damn hands!......but shes no BBW...shes not my favorite hooker on ECCIE, but shes far from a BBW........

Fat...

I say don't worry about that guy. You are well reviewed, respected and have a brilliant reputation among the people on the site. Don't give this guy's words a second thought.