CEO cuts own pay, raises workers' salaries

I B Dicksucking Originally Posted by WombRaider

You've admitted to that before, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, you stupidly ignore the social cost of your failed social program:

[A]nyone who understands basic economics knows that the result of raising the minimum wage can only be:

Higher unemployment as companies scale back to reduce expenses.

Higher costs to consumers as companies raise prices to cover the higher wages they have to pay

Companies closing their doors because they can’t scale back or raise prices.

So the result of an increased minimum wage is either higher inflation or higher unemployment both of which are components of the Misery Index thus increasing the minimum wage will most likely increase the overall misery of the country.

Nope. I still advocate minimum wage hike on social grounds. Originally Posted by WombRaider

So you concede there are negative economic costs? Good for you, undercunt. Overcoming denial is progress.

You've admitted to that before, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.

BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, you stupidly ignore the social cost of your failed social program:



Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Nothing can 'only' be this or 'only' be that. Economics isn't that exact. Nice try though. Like your colorful graphs. Not worth a shit, but colorful just the same.

You've also yet to offer a competing idea.

So you concede there are negative economic costs? Good for you, undercunt. Overcoming denial is progress. Originally Posted by lustylad

I concede nothing. So many other factors are at play in regards to what the economy does or doesn't do based on wage increase. To simply say, as dum dum does above, that raising wages will always lead to a certain end, is ludicrous.

Nothing can 'only' be this or 'only' be that. Economics isn't that exact. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You're right, undercunt – in a dynamic economy it can be BOTH! Some employers will react to a MW hike by raising their prices. Others will react by laying off workers. And some will adjust by using BOTH channels! So we can't be EXACT in predicting which component of the so-called Misery Index (inflation or unemployment) will bear the brunt of the economic adjustment costs. But we do know the costs will be borne and the Misery Index will be higher than it would have been in the absence of the MW increase.

I concede nothing. So many other factors are at play in regards to what the economy does or doesn't do based on wage increase. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Go back to rehab, you're relapsing again. And shamelessly contradicting yourself.

You're right, undercunt – in a dynamic economy it can be BOTH! Some employers will react to a MW hike by raising their prices. Others will react by laying off workers. And some will adjust by using BOTH channels! So we can't be EXACT in predicting which component of the so-called Misery Index (inflation or unemployment) will bear the brunt of the economic adjustment costs. But we do know the costs will be borne and the Misery Index will be higher than it would have been in the absence of the MW increase.




Go back to rehab, you're relapsing again. And shamelessly contradicting yourself. Originally Posted by lustylad

You've been caught out again. You've been found wanting. I'm not sure you understand the misery index when you refer to inflation OR unemployment. The very purpose of the index is the ADD the two together. It's not an either/or proposition. If you want to talk misery index though, the average was actually higher during Reagan's two terms AND Bush 2's two terms than it has been for Obama. Thanks for bringing that up.

You're right, undercunt – in a dynamic economy it can be BOTH! Some employers will react to a MW hike by raising their prices. Others will react by laying off workers. And some will adjust by using BOTH channels! So we can't be EXACT in predicting which component of the so-called Misery Index (inflation or unemployment) will bear the brunt of the economic adjustment costs. But we do know the costs will be borne and the Misery Index will be higher than it would have been in the absence of the MW increase.




Go back to rehab, you're relapsing again. And shamelessly contradicting yourself. Originally Posted by lustylad

I'm right most of the time, but thanks. Oh, you forgot to add this.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1349219

You've been caught out again. You've been found wanting. I'm not sure you understand the misery index when you refer to inflation OR unemployment. The very purpose of the index is the ADD the two together. It's not an either/or proposition. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Your reading comprehension clearly sucks, undercunt/wombhater. Re-read my post. The "OR" refers to which component of the index will bear most of the adjustment burden, not how the index is calculated.

Do you always fire before you aim, dipshit? Plus your typos are showing. The only thing "found wanting" is your tiny peepee when it is "caught out" in your zipper every time you take a wiz.

Oh, you forgot to add this.

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1349219 Originally Posted by WombRaider

Feel free to out yourself and your previous handles, undercunt. Saves me time.

Your reading comprehension clearly sucks, undercunt/wombhater. Re-read my post. The "OR" refers to which component of the index will bear most of the adjustment burden, not how the index is calculated.

Do you always fire before you aim, dipshit? Plus your typos are showing. The only thing "found wanting" is your tiny peepee when it is "caught out" in your zipper every time you take a wiz.





Feel free to out yourself and your previous handles, undercunt. Saves me time. Originally Posted by lustylad

You've been weighed, you've been measured and you've been found wanting. You're not even making any sense. How would a tiny peepee get caught in a zipper? A big ding dong gets caught in a zipper you fool. More proof you have no experience with large dongs. Your own or others.

Oh somebody is fixing to be outed, but it isn't me. I think you might be the secretary of the closet dicksuckers club. You've already got the bukkake beard of jizz to prove it. You're weak. Your comebacks are getting weaker by the post. I'm wearing you down. Just like I wear bitches kidneys down when I'm fucking them. Up to my nuts, in their guts.

How would a tiny peepee get caught in a zipper? A big ding dong gets caught in a zipper you fool. Originally Posted by WombRaider

The only time yours ever looked "big" was when you had a "bubble" on prom night....

You're weak. Your comebacks are getting weaker by the post. I'm wearing you down.... Up to my nuts, in their guts. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Lame, lamer, lamest... The only thing you are wearing down is your weak bag of insults. Stupidity is the mother of repetition and you repeat yourself more than anyone on eccie... "Up to my nuts, in their guts" - pay me $10 for each time you used that one, undercunt. I can live comfortably on that.


.

The only time yours ever looked "big" was when you had a "bubble" on prom night....









Lame, lamer, lamest... The only thing you are wearing down is your weak bag of insults. Stupidity is the mother of repetition and you repeat yourself more than anyone on eccie... "Up to my nuts, in their guts" - pay me $10 for each time you used that one, undercunt. I can live comfortably on that.


. Originally Posted by lustylad

That might net you $50. I guess living under a bridge is cheap though. Stupidity is the mother of repetition. Let's analyze that, shall we? If I had $10 for every time you've used the term 'undercunt', I could comfortably retire. Who's stupid now?

Nothing can 'only' be this or 'only' be that. Economics isn't that exact. Nice try though. Like your colorful graphs. Not worth a shit, but colorful just the same.

You've also yet to offer a competing idea. Originally Posted by WombRaider

The graph shows you are a stupid liar, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, and how your "#Grubered" ass is easily distracted by bright colors and baubles while you squirm to ignore pertinent facts, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas:

How many times will you post that graph before you get threatened with another ban, IBgrubergrubereed whose a Grubered #gruberedminion in his spotty flabby little bottomgruber?

How FUCKING STUPID are you, IBgruberedandgruberedsomemore? por are you just grubergrubergrubering?

Oh yeah, I don't understand why you're complaining about a raise to $9 an hour. IBGrubered? You can use the additional money to pay for grubergrubergrubergrubered, right, IBgrubergruber, you #grubered grubershit?

Can't stand it that an educated, successful, self-employed person you might want to enslave makes you look like an ignorant Grubered minion. Right?

How many times will you post that graph before you get threatened with another ban, IBgrubergrubereed whose a Grubered #gruberedminion in his spotty flabby little bottomgruber?

How FUCKING STUPID are you, IBgruberedandgruberedsomemore? por are you just grubergrubergrubering?

Oh yeah, I don't understand why you're complaining about a raise to $9 an hour. IBGrubered? You can use the additional money to pay for grubergrubergrubergrubered, right, IBgrubergruber, you #grubered grubershit? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Here we go again. IBidiotgruber is off on another lengthy hijacking Grubermission, where he'll grubergruber until her cant gruberhisgruber #anymore.

Three times now...

whatever happened to Nigeria, you
grubergrubergrubersexualfaggru ber?

Still Grubering the gay broadgruber musical Gruber I see, IBGrubergruber.