The Lynching of Kyle Rittenhouse

bah. 1b1 your blatant anti-cop bias and racism undoes your arguments .. failures that they are. all of your so-called statements have been wrong. if someone charges at me unarmed and i have a gun i have the legal right to pop a few caps in their face.



it's called self defense Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

TWK - 1b1/nm and his 'Racism" - in his mind take priority over teh Rule of law and common sense - EVERY Time!

Let teh Master at 'Baiting" be - he is not worth a response to the Communist nonsense he posts.



Buck fiden
From my cold dead hands.

The Militia Act of 1903 says that the UNORGANIZED MILITIA is comprised of every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, who is not a member of the State Defense Forces, National Guard, or Naval Militia.

The Militia Act of 1903 says that the UNORGANIZED MILITIA is comprised of every able-bodied man of at least 17 and under 45 years of age, who is not a member of the State Defense Forces, National Guard, or Naval Militia. Originally Posted by bambino

You don't say...

I have no idea ...I haven't kept up with this at all....heard they are going to let lesser charges be considered. Originally Posted by WTF

I suspect that out there in your desert of fake reporting there is a more carefully crafted prediction of an outcome, but I am really not interested in wasting my time searching fence-walking bullshitter posts like yours so that irrespective of the outcome you can appear to be knowledgeable and experienced on the topic .... whatever that might be.

I have no idea ...

You're better if you just stick with that line.

I heard him testify if I remember correctly...a friend bought it and he was going to buy it from his friend when he turned 18.

There are a whole slew of charges from murder one on down. From the one day I watched his testimony....when he cried....no way he gets a murder rap.

But that is my opinion from only one day of testimony.


I will say it once more....were he black...the cops would have shot his ass dead. They waved him through and would not even detain him after he told them he was the shooter! Originally Posted by WTF

LexusLover....please note the date.This was on 11-14

He is 18 years old now....but he was a child while brandishing a rifle and acting like Rambo.

What little I saw of the trial makes all this moot as I think he will be acquitted of murder. Doubt if he is convicted of any others since the weapons charge was dropped.

This is my take on events.

First the kid should not have been there....but he was. Next the first person he shot had just been let out of a hospital because of attempted suicide. He was wanting confrontation it seems.

That seemed jump start the assumption that the kid was randomly killing protesters.

This is exactly why police do not call on a bunch of armed amateurs for backup. Originally Posted by WTF

LexusLover. please not the date and the prediction. On 11-17 I was a tad more definitive

... I actually saw it at the time, LL.

He's being truthful about this.

just sayin' ...

### Salty

... I actually saw it at the time, LL.

He's being truthful about this.

just sayin' ...

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

LexusLover and oeb have their narrative to promote...even if they have to lie and distort what I said.

... I actually saw it at the time, LL.

He's being truthful about this.

just sayin' ...

### Salty Originally Posted by Salty Again

He's being "truthful" about what?

He spent months trying to justify his "prediction" in the Zimmerman trial for the death of Martin ... and even before the trial claiming Zimmerman would be convicted of "something" for the death of Martin. But like he's proclaimed on Eccie ...

.. predicting the verdict in a criminal case is the same as predicting the final score of a football game (my paraphrase, but "predicting" was HIS WORD!).

..and he proclaims he has the same qualities as a long-time Harvard Law Professor!!!!

I hear a giant sucking sound … coming from Clarksville!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!

I hear a giant sucking sound … coming from Clarksville!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Clarksville is all backed up from his lies about his lies

He's being "truthful" about what?

He spent months trying to justify his "prediction" in the Zimmerman trial for the death of Martin ... and even before the trial claiming Zimmerman would be convicted of "something" for the death of Martin. But like he's proclaimed on Eccie ...

: Originally Posted by LexusLover

I was wrong and admitted as much. Jesus.
Unlike you who says why they are right AFTER the fact...I made a simple prediction. No biggie.

He's being truthful

.. predicting the verdict in a criminal case is the same as predicting the final score of a football game (my paraphrase, but "predicting" was HIS WORD!).

..and he proclaims he has the same qualities as a long-time Harvard Law Professor!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Two things...One, predicting a verdict is just like predicting the outcome of a football game. This isn't rocket science.

I said we both said about the same thing. I said I said it before the verdict and I did.

I never said I was equal to Dershowitz in regards to knowledge of the law!

Must you always lie and distort what others say?

He's being "truthful" about what?

He spent months trying to justify his "prediction" in the Zimmerman trial for the death of Martin ... and even before the trial claiming Zimmerman would be convicted of "something" for the death of Martin. But like he's proclaimed on Eccie ...

.. predicting the verdict in a criminal case is the same as predicting the final score of a football game (my paraphrase, but "predicting" was HIS WORD!).

..and he proclaims he has the same qualities as a long-time Harvard Law Professor!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

... I don't care about the "Zimmerman issue" and whatever
claims were made then... Not me concern.

However, WTF did claim that he thought Rittenhouse would
NOT be convicted... I know this because He, I, and
a few other lads were in discussion about this on
the day BEFORE the verdict came.

Almost wish it wasn't true - But TRUE IT IS.
And I gotta call the fouls as I seem 'em, mate.

And also gotta tell the truth when I see it also.
Them's the breaks with bein' Australian.

#### Salty

I suspect that out there in your desert of fake reporting there is a more carefully crafted prediction of an outcome, but I am really not interested in wasting my time searching fence-walking bullshitter posts like yours so that irrespective of the outcome you can appear to be knowledgeable and experienced on the topic .... whatever that might be. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Here is my carefully crafted prediction of the verdict.

Where is yours?

Oh wait...you do not venture an opinion until AFTER the verdict, on others who predicted BEFORE the verdict.

That seems like a pussy move.

What little I saw of the trial makes all this moot as I think he will be acquitted of murder. Doubt if he is convicted of any others since the weapons charge was dropped.

This is my take on events.

First the kid should not have been there....but he was. Next the first person he shot had just been let out of a hospital because of attempted suicide. He was wanting confrontation it seems.

That seemed jump start the assumption that the kid was randomly killing protesters.

This is exactly why police do not call on a bunch of armed amateurs for backup. Originally Posted by WTF

And a funny think happened when you lied about hearing Dershowitz talk about this case...seems we both said the exact same thing about Rittenhouse being there...in that we both thought he SHOULD NOT have been there.