Terror Attack in Las Vegas

LexusLover's Avatar
I can see people checking in elsewhere.. Originally Posted by garhkal
I can see the "wand" being a temporary effort until the HighTec shit Vegas hotels can buy without a government bidding process or budget constraints stalling the implementation of more effective search technology.

Even though "union" influence may make a difference in this instance the "union" has an equal interest in making sure employees manning security matters are well trained in the Israeli art of personal protection.

Also look for enhanced "reservation" requirements and fewer last minute or "walk in" guests.

It can be an infrastructure nightmare, but the airport management might want to relocate the fuel storage facility with higher protection for the storage units after it was revealed the shooter shot at one of the jet fuel storage units.
bamscram's Avatar
Not a fetish, at all. Just acknowledging your lack of maturity, LITTLE BOY!

(Is all caps better for you, LITTLE BOY?)

Interesting you have abnormal "fetishes" on the mine though.

Seek counseling, unless it's too late. Originally Posted by LexusLover


Maybe Hillary will teach you some other thing to say. Besides Waaaak, little boy.
Parrots can be taught.
been thinkin' 'bout paddock's motivation

mulling over all the aspects and fitting it in with what we know of past mass shootings

the common denominator with most of the prior mass shootings is liberalism or being a dimocrat or at least being related to one

perhaps its paddock's blow against the 2nd amendment

acquire a bunch of weapons to show the ease of getting them

modify them to show how easy that is

then use them horrifically to amplify the need to eliminate the 2nd amendment

and what better a target then country music fans who tend to be gun owners and 2nd amendment supporters and lovers of america and the constitution?

his evil twisted mind thought that going out in a blaze of awfulness might be the spark needed and he'd be the martyr
LexusLover's Avatar

.... going out in a blaze of awfulness might be the spark needed and he'd be the martyr Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
.. except ... #1 he didn't, he killed himself, and #2 ...

as was discussed by at the update news conference yesterday ...

.. he had an "escape" plan in place.
.. except ... #1 he didn't, he killed himself, and #2 ...

as was discussed by at the update news conference yesterday ...

.. he had an "escape" plan in place. Originally Posted by LexusLover
killing oneself doesnt negate the idea of martyrdom, witness suicide bombers

and as you say, he might have had an escape plan, although that's speculation at this point, but to what end, further mayhem with explosives in his car? and what's more, thinking he could escape doesn't negate the theory as well, merely displays further delusion
LexusLover's Avatar
killing oneself doesnt negate the idea of martyrdom, witness suicide bombers

and as you say, he might have had an escape plan, although that's speculation at this point, but to what end, further mayhem with explosives in his car? and even more thinking he could escape doesn't negate the theory as well, merely displays further delusion Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
Can you see a distinction between killing oneself when cornered and killing oneself while simultaneously killing and injuring the targets? There is a distinction, although when one is trying to maintain a "point" I can understand why one would want to "blur" the lines ....

as for the "escape" plan ... my impression is ... it is ONLY "speculation" to those of us who have not seen the physical evidence in the possession of LE (local and Feds). Body language and facial expressions indicated the Sheriff had "hard evidence" he had an "escape plan" and the items found in at least one of his vehicles indicated a secondary activity and scene.

Had he been successful in rupturing the fuel tanks and exploding them the LE response might not have been so timely from a description of the resulting explosion and fireball.
I B Hankering's Avatar
he is not much of a Gambler if he had to rent those rooms. If you knew anything about gambling, you'd know those rooms are Comped for gamblers. You get rooms, tickets , food free....as long as you gamble at a certain rate.
Originally Posted by WTF
The room, which goes for $590 a night, was given to Paddock for free because he was a good customer who wagered tens of thousands of dollars each time he visited the casino, the person said.

(Mercury News)
.
Can you see a distinction between killing oneself when cornered and killing oneself while simultaneously killing and injuring the targets? There is a distinction, although when one is trying to maintain a "point" I can understand why one would want to "blur" the lines ....

as for the "escape" plan ... my impression is ... it is ONLY "speculation" to those of us who have not seen the physical evidence in the possession of LE (local and Feds). Body language and facial expressions indicated the Sheriff had "hard evidence" he had an "escape plan" and the items found in at least one of his vehicles indicated a secondary activity and scene.

Had he been successful in rupturing the fuel tanks and exploding them the LE response might not have been so timely from a description of the resulting explosion and fireball. Originally Posted by LexusLover
I don't see how any of this makes a dent in my "theory" that he wanted to kill the 2nd amendment
bamscram's Avatar
I don't see how any of this makes a dent in my "theory" that he wanted to kill the 2nd amendment Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
His father suffered from mental illness, it could have struck him later in life also.
Whatever it was he has covered the trail fairly well.
LexusLover's Avatar
I don't see how any of this makes a dent in my "theory" that he wanted to kill the 2nd amendment Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
Did someone try to "make a dent in" your "theory that he wanted to kill the 2nd amendment"?

What "he wanted" IS "speculation of the highest order" in the absence of a written "manifesto" stating clearly "what he wanted," so there really is no need to "dent" your "theory," is there?

Since he began his "planning" a little over a year ago by acquiring weapons capable of carrying out the "plan," and it was around the time that the "handwriting" was on the wall as far as the 2016 POTUS election outcome ... (except to "the oblivious") ... then his "motivation" seems more akin to that of the shooter in D.C. who attacked "Republicans" while practicing for "The Baseball Game" ... as he "sterotyped" C&W concert attendees.

Do you "think" he really believed killing a bunch of people with an automatic rifle would result in the repeal of the 2nd amendment? Because that's what you're suggesting!
bamscram's Avatar
He was going to buy a gun shop, and wanted congress to pass a law where all concert goers were required to carry assault type weapons with bump stocks, and at least 500 rounds of ammo.
How is that for a theory?
Do you "think" he really believed killing a bunch of people with an automatic rifle would result in the repeal of the 2nd amendment? Because that's what you're suggesting! Originally Posted by LexusLover
don't know what all the quote marks are about

but yeah his hopeful motive, however delusional

what is the first political thing occurring after the event? dims, hollywood, late night tv hosts, the media, all in a cacophony of bleats about gun control
LexusLover's Avatar
don't know what all the quote marks are about

but yeah his hopeful motive Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
Occasionally, I will use "quotation marks" around words that just don't seem to fit the reality of the situation described, since you apparently "think" you know what he was "thinking"!

Humor yourself. But it is not a "credible" theory based on the "inferences" drawn from his extensive planning and implementation of this "event" for more than a year, including making "arrangements" for his GF to set up housekeeping overseas by wiring her $100,000. Do the Philippines have a 2nd amendment?

Those activities also just about shit-can the "brain tumor/brain damage" scenario that caused him to "flip" like Whitman, which was just as highly speculative, particularly based on the autopsy and Governor's Committee investigating Whitman's "motivations"!

Our Current Fake Media is .... well .... ridiculous.
cptjohnstone's Avatar
Not a fetish, at all. Just acknowledging your lack of maturity, LITTLE BOY!

(Is all caps better for you, LITTLE BOY?)

Interesting you have abnormal "fetishes" on the mine though.

Seek counseling, unless it's too late. Originally Posted by LexusLover
he is a snow flake, he uses all the terms that cannot be found thru google ie "lemmings"

and a big Trump hater
Occasionally, I will use "quotation marks" around words that just don't seem to fit the reality of the situation described, since you apparently "think" you know what he was "thinking"!

Humor yourself. But it is not a "credible" theory based on the "inferences" drawn from his extensive planning and implementation of this "event" for more than a year, including making "arrangements" for his GF to set up housekeeping overseas by wiring her $100,000. Do the Philippines have a 2nd amendment?

Those activities also just about shit-can the "brain tumor/brain damage" scenario that caused him to "flip" like Whitman, which was just as highly speculative, particularly based on the autopsy and Governor's Committee investigating Whitman's "motivations"!

Our Current Fake Media is .... well .... ridiculous. Originally Posted by LexusLover
I know the theory is merely a thought, and quite possibly merely entertaining

but whats out there besides?

even the insane have motivations

I never indicated I knew what he was "thinking"

his planning, his gf going to the philippines, etc etc etc, has no impact on anything I have mentioned other than actually fitting in with the theory

my motivation for even posing a theory was more to get a rise out of the liberals here than anything