Who is "they"? Originally Posted by LexusLover
you a little slow ... stop crying obamainable shit
Yeah, I won my bet, jokers like yourself didn't honor their end. BTW, you said " I bets" what a retard. Originally Posted by bambinoHey bet welcher. You have not ever bet me so How did you win anything? As for the spelling anomaly, I am sure you have heard of "Ebonics" at one of the Klan meetings. I have lost count of how many spelling mistakes you have made so who the fuck are you to question anyone. So back to this betting deal, when you gonna bet? You keep running your mouth but I do not see any results. You do not learn from your mistakes either.
A slave is a slave regardless of skin color. Originally Posted by bamscramThat's correct, and there were white slaves, Arab Slaves and even free blacks had slaves right here in America. This ridiculous idea that American settlers chased down blacks in the African Jungle and brought them back to America as slaves is bullshit. Slavery was an industry. One Slave port was in Zanzibar Africa where slaves were auctioned and not all of them were African. Nobody wants slavery to return and nobody that I can think of advocates the practice of slavery. What's it been 250-300 years since slavery existed in America and we still talk about, why? If we want to improve race relations in this country it might help if we stopped redefining racism. Pretty soon everything will be racist and we'll be worse off than ever, it's pathetic.
It's been around for 10,000 yrs. and the first slaves were white. It's evolved over time, but to crucify America for slavery is misguided. Originally Posted by bambinoAnd even WHEN blacks were slaves here, OTHER cultures also got put into slavery.. Then yu also need to add, it was FELLOW black tribesmen that sold the other blacks into slavery.. TO MUSLIM Slave traders..
I think the point that is being brought about is that all slavery is "bad"? it has happened to all races and all generations before us. You are a my slave right now, you don't even know it... Originally Posted by nikkilick206Exactly.. BUT THE LEFT won't acknowledge that, they just go after 'the bad white man'..
Indentured servants often came voluntarily, and those who were sentenced to servitude for crimes had a lot more autonomy than African chattel. Originally Posted by Vivienne ReyBut they were still enslaved to someone else, were they not?
So, if the war between the states was about owning slaves; how many of the soldiers that fought in the war actually owned slaves? I am sure you leftist civil war historians know the answer to this one. Originally Posted by The2DogsMaybe .5% at most..
Then if you had the balls you could go on to say. when those Dems finally came to accept those slaves were now free and able to vote they formed the KKK to terrorize and pressure blacks to vote Democratic, and it has stuck ever since.Which is why i can't understand how the leftist media keeps saying the KKK is 'alt-right'.. Since they were formed by the dems, most of their higher ups were dems and some of the most prominent SUPPORTED dems (the grand dragon was an outspoken hillary supporter)..
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
The end game is to continue to undermine the founders, the constitution, Capitalism, and this nationWhich to me is why all this 'talk' about "IT will end once these statues are down," is pure bupbkiss to me.. THEY WON'T stop till the've torn the US down for good.
Why do these leftists going around the country from one flash point to another raising havoc and hurting people know or care about a marse robert statue? They don't, it doesn't affect them. They hate america and using slavery of 170 years ago works for them Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
I condemn the manner in which the rally was carried out. The City apparently gave the Alt-Right a permit to hold this rally, which was the wrong thing to do. All other groups whether it was KKK, or BLM ect came prepared to cause problems. This incident is just the tip of the iceberg. It will happen again and the next one will be even worse and the next one after that. There are no winners here. Look at it anyway you like, this country is now finished. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisinWhy?? SHould we now dictate who can and can't exercise their right to free speech??
I really don't think these groups give a fuck about these statues. It's just their excuse de jour to promote whatever their agenda is. I've been to Charlottesville, Richmond, Williamsburg many times over the past 30yrs. Those statues coexisted peacefully with the locals as well as visitors. It's a beautiful and historic part of our country. The people there are educated and cordial. The Mayor of Charlottesville voted to keep the statues earlier this year. Now, he's just grandstanding and reversing his vote. Maybe he'll get voted out. Because it's a slippery slope. The left will come after Jefferson. That would be a huge problem there if they do. Originally Posted by bambinoVery true.. IMO this is all just pure on anarchy, designed to bring down the US, by splitting it up.
A word of note, Obama's family in Africa has been definitely linked to the slave trade but not in a good way. I guess that means no statues of that former president. Anyway, back to the new world. The first African slave was brought to what would be the United States in 1637 by the English in the colony of Virginia. Have to remember that, English law, not US law. That wouldn't exist for another 150 years. Originally Posted by the_real_BarleycornThat's gonna chap the ass of all the obamaites up in chi-raq who are getting a petition up to install an obama statue in chitown..
the ALT LEFT a.k.a that "other group" shouldn't have been there at all you idiot. they had no permit to do so. they'd show up at an Easter egg hunt if they thought they could get some news footage for the 6 o'clock newscast. Originally Posted by The_Waco_KidActually the leftists DID get a permit, though i am not sure if the Antifa fascists did, just the other groups counter protesting..
Yes, I keep asking my Liberal friends if they think the US should go to war with CA like they did the south if they were to actually secede. I have yet to get a answer. Originally Posted by goodolboyAnd i say LET CA go.. Don't give them any bail outs, shut down all US military bases there, pull out all the people from the fed buildings, Especially all the border agents, and Customs guys at the ports.. LET CA deal with its own customs..
Very possible it was specifically set up to be chaotic. If that is truly the case it will come out in the wash. I am willing to bet Trump suspects that and that's why he condemns both sides. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisinUnfortunately i don't see ANY amount of proof that it was staged to get chaotic, will appease the baying mobs in the lame stream media..
Blacks are no longer slaves physically, but they are still slaves mentally and that is their problem ,no one else's. The white man did his part to abolish slaver. Until blacks can get their minds off the plantation they will never experience true peace or equality. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisinWell said jim. And which party is it that seems to want to keep them down.. DEMS!
Actually the leftists DID get a permit, though i am not sure if the Antifa fascists did, just the other groups counter protesting.. Originally Posted by garhkalthey had a permit, but it was for different park in another part of the town. so they shamelessly broke rules to counter protest the one alt-right was going to.
Which is why i can't understand how the leftist media keeps saying the KKK is 'alt-right'.. Since they were formed by the dems, most of their higher ups were dems and some of the most prominent SUPPORTED dems (the grand dragon was an outspoken hillary supporter).. Originally Posted by garhkalKKK is right wing. its membership consisted mostly of racist conservative democrats in the 3rd iteration (1946 - 1990) of the Klan you did have some racists leftists who were members like late Senator Byrd. I'm not sure of its political composition after 1991.
How can someone be a CONSERVATIVE Democrat? That's an oxymoron, just as much as "military intelligence" or "Unbiased media" is. Originally Posted by garhkalnot an oxymoron. conservative democrats are a real thing at least until the 1990's.
How can someone be a CONSERVATIVE Democrat? That's an oxymoron, just as much as "military intelligence" or "Unbiased media" is. Originally Posted by garhkalYou're a fucking ignorant imbecile. How can Barry White be black and Jack Black be white? You still haven't straightened out that logic for us, have you, jerkall?
You're a fucking ignorant imbecile.You're a fucking swine imbecile.
Are you 18 years old? Or did you just get your first cable TV subscription?
You probably ought to STFU until you read some history, err, books.
And Drop to your knees and pray that Rebel statues aren't the foundation of life as we know it in America. Because the country is going to hell, right?
Very presidential. Very presidential. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
That's correct, and there were white slaves, Arab Slaves and even free blacks had slaves right here in America. This ridiculous idea that American settlers chased down blacks in the African Jungle and brought them back to America as slaves is bullshit. Slavery was an industry. One Slave port was in Zanzibar Africa where slaves were auctioned and not all of them were African. Nobody wants slavery to return and nobody that I can think of advocates the practice of slavery. What's it been 250-300 years since slavery existed in America and we still talk about, why? If we want to improve race relations in this country it might help if we stopped redefining racism. Pretty soon everything will be racist and we'll be worse off than ever, it's pathetic.Who EVER claimed that American settlers chased down "blacks" in The African Jungle?
Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin