For those who need proof of election fraud....

Primaries are local news...

https://www.thepundwaygateit.com/2021/08/latest-poll-90-voters-concerned-election-cheating-74-support-er/ Originally Posted by bambino

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...-want-photo-id


“A new national report found that election integrity is the most important political issue in the minds of the American people. A whopping 90% reported that it is important to tackle the scourge of election fraud.

Conservatives should not shy away from the importance of meaningful election integrity. America stands with us!”

So say the election fraud purveyors of HR-1!!!
DPST's will do anything - no matter how low - to cheat to win
They cannot win an election of integrity
IMHO!

The lying piece of shit speaks. Which means he's adding to that 30,000 plus lies.

The election has been covered by CNN, Time, CBS, WaPo, NYT, etc. And what story has the WaPo gotten wrong that they didn't correct?

Watching Trumpys believe anything Trump says is evidence they will believe what they are told to believe.

The first paragraph of his statement told how big a headline the primaries were.
At the end of his statement he claims it was barely covered.
What an asshole.
Trumpys keep giving him money. None of which has gone to audits.
Originally Posted by VerySkeptical

Very true. The election was covered by most networks before and after the election. Trump is now 1 and 1 in his support of candidates -- his backed candidate won in Ohio and lost in Texas. Of course, as usual, Trump has a "reason" why his candidate lost in Texas. ALways the gracious loser.

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-blame...n-lost-1616204

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...-want-photo-id


“A new national report found that election integrity is the most important political issue in the minds of the American people. A whopping 90% reported that it is important to tackle the scourge of election fraud.

Conservatives should not shy away from the importance of meaningful election integrity. America stands with us!” Originally Posted by bambino

Here is another quote from the article:

Voters polled, however, do not believe it affected the overall 2020 election, though they are concerned about it intensely, said Rasmussen.

Fraud requires no 'graciousness'.
It requires prosecution.

Fraud requires no 'graciousness'.
It requires prosecution. Originally Posted by oeb11

Fraud needs PROOF and now 9 months after the election there is no PROOF that any significant fraud occurred in the 2020 election that would come close to changing the election results. NONE.

SR - you would not ever recognize any proof regardless - you are too embedded in teh communist DPST propaganda.

Sadly - it is the same for some others of teh DPST posters.


IMHO - respectfully!


The psychological maneuver is common for DPSTs to reject facts - Indeed - it is 'Denial"!

SR - you would not ever recognize any proof regardless - you are too embedded in teh communist DPST propaganda.

Sadly - it is the same for some others of teh DPST posters.

IMHO - respectfully!

The psychological maneuver is common for DPSTs to reject facts - Indeed - it is 'Denial"! Originally Posted by oeb11

Wrongfully calling someone a "Communist" is not respectful.

Many allegations, no proof.

sadly its the us V them that the LSM and politicos are pushing

Fraud needs PROOF and now 9 months after the election there is no PROOF that any significant fraud occurred in the 2020 election that would come close to changing the election results. NONE. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Lets just play Devils advocate here for a moment. What would you accept as proof? please try to be specific, not vague...

I'd accept any court case that looked at the evidence and convicted anyone of fraud. How many court cases have been tossed out because of no evidence? 70 now? Here's what happens, trump and associates claim all this fraud in media, but when it goes to court the judges (even trump appointed judges) look at what they have and kick them out of court. Trumptards keep saying "it's coming", well where is it? We're waiting.

Lets just play Devils advocate here for a moment. What would you accept as proof? please try to be specific, not vague... Originally Posted by texassapper

Anything that has been verified as being true by election officials. Remember that election officials in Arizona and Georgia are primarily Republicans.

Anything that has been verified as being true by election officials. Remember that election officials in Arizona and Georgia are primarily Republicans. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Regardless of party affiliation, if there were fraud at the levels being alleged, then the election officials were likely involved... Do you think they would verify that there was fraud that they were a part of?

Therefor you're essentially saying there is no way to prove fraud ever.