Give me an allegation that YOU believe has been substantiated as significant voter fraud in Arizona or Georgia.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Define substantiated for me...
If you say Dominion servers changed votes from Trump to Biden supply proof that that happened.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Well see you just changed the terms. There are allegations. Until those can be openly investigated and evidentiary hearings heard, there isn't "proof" per se. Democrats are fighting the investigation which might substantiate the allegations. Why? If there was no fraud, investigations would and should be welcomed because legitimate elections are in all citizens best interests. Civil strife only results when one side doubts the legitimacy of the election. Please explain how in normal counting processes the below occurs...
How do mail in ballots arrive before they are sent? There may be a perfectly logical explanation for it, but I have as yet to see any. instead all I've seen are people being banned who mention such things and screams of "Where is the proof?!" Well, let's investigate and determine the facts... but Democrats don't want to do that because FUCK YOU THAT'S WHY!
If you say illegal voters voted for Biden in the thousands supply proof that that happened.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Again you want PROOF before allowing an investigation. Is that how criminal investigations work? I mean what would constitute PROOF prior to allowing an investigation?
There are sworn affidavits that there was election fraud... But you want PROOF before the investigation.
If this were a murder investigation, you'd have video evidence, sworn testimony, statistical data that points to the killer and yet you'd still be asking for PROOF prior to investigation and trial. Does that make a whole lot of sense?
If you say votes were rescanned several times provide proof that that happened.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
There's FCUKING video of the boxes of ballots pulled from UNDER a table scanned, and rescanned while election observers were not allowed to watch. Again I have to ask, if video of ballots being rescanned isn't a basis for an investigation... WHAT THE FCUK WOULD YOU DEFINE AS
PROOF???
Remember that a hand recount of votes was done in Georgia and the results matched the machine output.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX
Analysis of the recount found
falsified tally sheets, and the chain of custody documents are
MISSING. (be sure to click on the links in the pdf because those images would be PROOF in my mind...I mean what would you call the falsified tally sheet? So election fraud committed twice is a real possibility.
Again, plenty of evidence of fraudulent activity... but you want PROOF before investigation...
And there's only one reason for that continued demand BEFORE an investigation and that's to forestall an investigation. I don't seem to recall Republicans preventing news organizations from reviewing the Bush-Gore ballots in Florida... which eventually validated Bush' win.
Wouldn't it be great if we allowed an investigation this time too? What if it validated Bidens win? wouldn't that be a good thing? What if it invalidated Bidens win? Would that be a good thing too or not?