Makes ya wonder doesn't it. If the Military, CIA and State Dept. never regarded the attack stemmed from a video why did Clinton and Obama think so?
Jim Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Hahaha, You still think the attacks were because of a video don't ya? Get with the program, that story doesn't fly anymore. Not even with the people who made it up.
at least it gave the simpletons something to drool about for a couple of years... be thankful you're blessed and wear a bib. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
any due process would need to be a civil naturel... civil doesn't apply to GOVERNMENT employees ... so again I ask you what LAW....This makes less sense than usual, CBJ7. Are you stating the due process only applies in civil matters, and does not apply to government employees?
stand up straight and answer like a human Originally Posted by CJ7
Makes ya wonder doesn't it. If the Military, CIA and State Dept. never regarded the attack stemmed from a video why did Clinton and Obama think so?I doubt Obama really thought the attack was the result of a video. It simply looked better than admitting we lost lives to a planned attack. Didn't want that heading into an election.
Jim Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
This makes less sense than usual, CBJ7. Are you stating the due process only applies in civil matters, and does not apply to government employees?
The Obamatron has short-circuited your cognitive abilities.
do you have a supporting document declaring that in none of the 13 investigations no one saw this Fucking Document, cocksucker? Does your ignorant ass understand anything? Originally Posted by i'va biggenPer that *conservative* news source: NPR --
"As a result of a newly released White House email, House Speaker John Boehner has decided to set up a special committee to investigate the attack in Libya..."Listen for yourself, Ekim the Inbred Chimp:
Per that *conservative* news source: NPR --Listen to yourself In Bred you got swiftboated. How did it feel?
Listen for yourself, Ekim the Inbred Chimp:
http://www.wnyc.org/story/politics-in-the-news_10/ Originally Posted by I B Hankering
There are two types of constitutional Due Process at issue here – procedural Due Process, and Due Process liberty interests. Though it is not always an easy argument, under certain circumstances, some Courts recognize that both can be applied where Government employees’ jobs are taken unlawfully.Doubling down on stupid. How does this apply to the topic? Hint: It doesn't.
Procedural Due Process means that Government employees cannot be deprived of their employment without notice of the proposed action and a meaningful opportunity to respond. See generally Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 542-45, 105 S.Ct. 1487, 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985). The Federal Government, for example, has developed procedures by which many employees are given notice of the charges and specifications against them, with thirty days to respond, orally and in writing, before an action can be finalized.
A Due Process liberty interest relates to a situation in which the Government’s action has not only deprived someone of a particular job, but of the ability to practice in a whole profession. For example, if someone were specially trained in a narrow field, and his/her whole career was in that field, and the Government’s removal action lacked Due Process and effectively prevented him/her of ever working again in that field, then he/she may have been deprived of a Liberty Interest. See generally Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433, 437, 91 S.Ct. 507, 27 L.Ed.2d 515 (1971).
and that brings us to criminal charges..
oh wait, there aren't any. Originally Posted by CJ7
