What constitutes "boots on the ground"?

Actually, it doesn't at all. What the polls often fail to reflect are the actual thoughts of the person responding, as opposed to the response to a pre-designed question(s) ..... But I am not the one who brought up "popularity," so my posting of polls actually demonstrates the irrelevance of a President's "popularity" at even given time ... and a "post-office" poll can represent several things beneath the surface that are not articulated in the questions asked.

For instance your current opinion about what may be in 6 years, presupposes that you will be around in 6 years to report it ... or I will be here to see it. You are therefore shouting in the forest for no one to hear/see.

So how are you going to explain a poll showing Obaminable's popularity at na all time low in 6 years ..... ? Because some Presidents' ratings go down after they leave office (why would that occur?). "Just because"? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I notice you didn't touch your little grammar jizz up from earlier. Couldn't find the clean end of that turd, could you?

No, it doesn't. We were talking about the "nuances" of Odumbo keeping Hamas on the terrorist list. Try to keep up, moron.

All you can do is demonstrate - over and over - that you are, by far, the stupidest, incontinent motherfucker on eccie!
. Originally Posted by lustylad

+1

You've pulled the old IB two step. You're too goddamn stupid to talk about two things at once with your one-track mind. We were talking about past presidents and their popularity. You know this. It refuted your claim on that subject and you chose to make the above remark. Everyone sees you for what you are. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Stop wasting our time, dipshit. Anyone can trace back our exchange of posts and see it related to the Hamas question, which you tried to duck by intentionally deflecting to the other discussion of presidents and their popularity. This is a perfect example of how libtards never advance a debate - they only go backwards or around in circles.

+1 Originally Posted by I B Hankering

The freelance faggot's incontinence is partly a result of all the laxatives he gulps down while he is working at the gloryholes. Then he shows up here spewing uncontrolled verbal diarrhea.
.

This is a perfect example of how libtards never advance a debate - they only go backwards or around in circles.




a.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

Which is exactly what so called libtards think/say about your dumbass. Big circle jerk.



.

I notice you didn't touch your little grammar jizz up from earlier. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You're teaching grammar these days? Remarkable.

It is if it WAS properly conducted. LLIdiot simply injected his opinion into the matter. He has no way of knowing if the poll was properly conducted or not. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Oh, Mr. WordSmith .... "It is if it WAS properly conducted" should be ...

"It is if it WERE properly conducted." Originally Posted by LexusLover

A poll is singular, therefore 'was' is correct. You are definitely not a wordsmith. Keep trying, though. Originally Posted by WombRaider

You are wrong, again, as usual. It has nothing to do with "plural vs. singular."

It has to do with the use of the word "if" ... in the sentence speculating about the condition as an alternative .... "were" is correct. Now go cut and paste some ignorant shit that facilitates the backwoods perspective of yours.

Stop wasting our time, dipshit. Anyone can trace back our exchange of posts and see it related to the Hamas question, which you tried to duck by intentionally deflecting to the other discussion of presidents and their popularity. This is a perfect example of how libtards never advance a debate - they only go backwards or around in circles.




The freelance faggot's incontinence is partly a result of all the laxatives he gulps down while he is working at the gloryholes. Then he shows up here spewing uncontrolled verbal diarrhea.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

Followed it back and it definitely shows you're full of shit. Looks like you NEED some laxatives...

You're unable to follow a simple train of thought. You're a perfect example of republitards; alway whining, never doing shit about it.

You are wrong, again, as usual. It has nothing to do with "plural vs. singular."

It has to do with the use of the word "if" ... in the sentence speculating about the condition as an alternative .... "were" is correct. Now go cut and paste some ignorant shit that facilitates the backwoods perspective of yours. Originally Posted by LexusLover

No, it's not. It's funny to watch you try and school someone on writing though. Site the information that proves your point or STFU. Polls were conducted. Poll was conducted.

You're saying it's 'poll were conducted', which sounds about as retarded as you look.

Head back to those Kansas mountains, you bus stop whore.

Stop wasting our time, dipshit. Anyone can trace back our exchange of posts and see it related to the Hamas question, which you tried to duck by intentionally deflecting to the other discussion of presidents and their popularity. This is a perfect example of how libtards never advance a debate - they only go backwards or around in circles.




The freelance faggot's incontinence is partly a result of all the laxatives he gulps down while he is working at the gloryholes. Then he shows up here spewing uncontrolled verbal diarrhea.
. Originally Posted by lustylad

And in woomby's case, he does BOTH ! He will walk backwards toward a " client " down at the 'holes and is ALWAYS willing to be the pivot man in a circle jerk to get his hourly demand for those ropey loads ! And if he can combine BOTH for some ATM, he's even more delirious with joy !

While the idiots are discussing grammar Donald Trump (yes, that Donald Trump) made a very good point. If he was going to put boots on the ground, it would be enough boots to make a difference and he WOULD NOT TELL THE ENEMY THAT THEY WERE COMING like Obama did. There are now bounties on the lives of the special forces trainers being sent to Syria because of Obama.

Here is how it used to be done by democrats; Operation Torch was the invasion of North Africa in 1942 which was an election year. The invasion was set for the eighth of November. Many democratic politicians urged FDR to move up the date of the invasion to BEFORE election day to help their chances. FDR did consider this but the military staffers told him about the high tide and the full moon plus the number of lives that could be lost by moving up the invasion. Roosevelt refused to change the date for politics. That is what democrats used to be like.

While the idiots are discussing grammar Donald Trump (yes, that Donald Trump) made a very good point. If he was going to put boots on the ground, it would be enough boots to make a difference and he WOULD NOT TELL THE ENEMY THAT THEY WERE COMING like Obama did. There are now bounties on the lives of the special forces trainers being sent to Syria because of Obama.

Here is how it used to be done by democrats; Operation Torch was the invasion of North Africa in 1942 which was an election year. The invasion was set for the eighth of November. Many democratic politicians urged FDR to move up the date of the invasion to BEFORE election day to help their chances. FDR did consider this but the military staffers told him about the high tide and the full moon plus the number of lives that could be lost by moving up the invasion. Roosevelt refused to change the date for politics. That is what democrats used to be like. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Wonder who it was that gave Saddam months of warning ?

Wonder who it was that gave Saddam months of warning ? Originally Posted by i'va biggen

You seem to have forgotten but I was there at the time. Your head is up your ass. No one can hide the movement of over 500,000 troops to a region but they did hide exactly when the ground troops went over the berm into Iraq. Even the air assault was a surprise at 0400. Don't bring up things that you know nothing about.

And in woomby's case, he does BOTH ! He will walk backwards toward a " client " down at the 'holes and is ALWAYS willing to be the pivot man in a circle jerk to get his hourly demand for those ropey loads ! And if he can combine BOTH for some ATM, he's even more delirious with joy ! Originally Posted by Rey Lengua

In gay rey's case, his momma/seester are delirious with joy anytime he comes back from walking backwards through the dingleberry fields and he's covered in shit and they can make a meal out of it. Those fat bitches have an hourly demand for crusty turd fingers and you're just the pivot man to make it happen, you degenerate cock gobbler.

PS - maybe if you had taken a few more ropey loads, you wouldn't look like the crypt keeper

You seem to have forgotten but I was there at the time. Your head is up your ass. No one can hide the movement of over 500,000 troops to a region but they did hide exactly when the ground troops went over the berm into Iraq. Even the air assault was a surprise at 0400. Don't bring up things that you know nothing about. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

So I guess daddy bush had no choice, right? So he gets a pass. Do you honestly think that we are telling them exactly where we are going. Just saying you're going to Syria doesn't tell them jack shit. And how do you know there wouldn't have been bounties on our troops anyway?

You seem to have forgotten but I was there at the time. Your head is up your ass. No one can hide the movement of over 500,000 troops to a region but they did hide exactly when the ground troops went over the berm into Iraq. Even the air assault was a surprise at 0400. Don't bring up things that you know nothing about. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

STFU, fuck you have been everywhere according to your bragging ass. I heard the many times Bush told Saddam we were coming. It was all over the news, hell the news media was in Baghdad when the first strike occurred. We got to see it in real time.