How is this any better than bbfs?

Burk, I was not wrong lol. Deal with it. We both said the same freaking thing, only you threw numbers in the mix.

AGAIN, WHY DO YOU COVER UP FOR BBFS AND NOT FOR BBBJ?

Just answer the question Burk! Come on Clair, it's just one question! LMAO! Originally Posted by London Rayne

Gosh I just don't think she has the capability to understand. I COVER UP FOR FULL SERVICE BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO GET AN STD. Now because you are apparrently not understanding this I will say it one more time. The statisical odds of getting a STD from oral sex and NURU are not very different. That is because the odds of vaginal ingestion of semen from NURU are not the same as from BBFS. Are you not getting this? Do you realize how fucking stupid you look by saying the same thing over and over again because you just don't understand the math. You are the one that brought up the math originally by quoting your online statistics that you made sure everyone knew about. The math says there are very close. The odd are slim either way. I did not say that there was not a risk. There is a risk just like there is a risk everytime you allow CIM. My suggetion is you go to class and learn something because the longer you talk the more stupid you look. It's like maybe if you say it louder it will be true

Nuru that involves cum all over a vagina is not as risky as oral sex....HAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!! Ok dude. Call me with your STD results!

You are the one NOT getting this Burk. I never said bbfs WITH FULL ON EJACULATION was safer than nuru.. I said bbfs with NO EJACULATION seemed to make more sense than the nuru where the cum is all over my damn kitty! If you screw a girl and pull out to cum, that is less risky than cumming all over her vagina without ever going inside her! Who is the dumb one here? You can't even grasp what I have said a hundred times!

You keep saying the stats of getting an STD from Nuru and oral sex are not very different, but that's not only what we are looking at! We are looking at full ejaculation from the nuru onto the vagina. Am I making sense now? Cum in your mouth, and cum in your vagina whether the weenie is in or not, are still nowhere near the same damn risk!

I can see this is pointless, because you don't even know what I am comparing here. Naomi pretty much summed it up with on sentence and you didn't even get that, so I am done here. I have a headache.

You two are going to get an infraction if you don't cut it out. Burk, I was paying attention to you until "fucking stupid". Anyways, can you please further explain this to me in greater detail?

That is because the odds of vaginal ingestion of semen from NURU are not the same as from BBFS. Originally Posted by burkalini

I've always looked at it this way "Cum in vagina is cum in vagina" meaning a little bit of cum in the vagina can cause just as much damage as a lot of cum in the vagina.

He means that semen from Nuru may or may not go in and it does with bbfs, but that's not the freaking point! BBFS WITHOUT CUMMING is still safer than nuru if the guy in fact comes all over her vagina....possibly going in!

No cum, less risk was the point I was making and the one he has yet to get. He keeps comparing full on ejaculation in bbfs to outside ejaculation from nuru, when that's not even what was being discussed. I realize if a guy cums all the way in a woman the risk is greater than cumming outside...duh. That's not what the hell I was talking about lol.

BBFS WITHOUT CUMMING is still safer than nuru if the guy in fact comes all over her vagina....possibly going in! Originally Posted by London Rayne

I agree with everything else but I think BBFS without cumming would carry the same risk as NURU.
With NURU semen would be present, with BBFS WITHOUT Cumming, Semen would be present.
Both involve skin to skin contact.

I don't think you even read your online article. It quotes BBFS not NURU. I have come to the conclusion that it is just out of your realm of understanding. I will stop trying to make you understand. London you act like the difference is large. It's negligable in its scale to the larger number of nothing happening. You don't understand this. I will apologize for calling you stupid. Just because you don't know math it doesn't make you stupid. I did come to the realization though that your very young and react with the level of a young girl when questioned on her correctness. When you go to class next time have a math instructor help you out so it will make a little more sense. He will give you a formula that will give you the answer. I'm hungry so instead of continuing this I am going to dinner. You can have the last word now.

I agree with everything else but I think BBFS without cumming would carry the same risk as NURU.
With NURU semen would be present, with BBFS WITHOUT Cumming, Semen would be present.
Both involve skin to skin contact. Originally Posted by Naomi4u

I am not so sure about that. A load of cum in my vagina still would scare me more than a bare member. Not saying you can't still catch something, but yikes!

I don't think you even read your online article. It quotes BBFS not NURU. I have come to the conclusion that it is just out of your realm of understanding. I will stop trying to make you understand. London you act like the difference is large. It's negligable in its scale to the larger number of nothing happening. You don't understand this. I will apologize for calling you stupid. Just because you don't know math it doesn't make you stupid. I did come to the realization though that your very young and react with the level of a young girl when questioned on her correctness. When you go to class next time have a math instructor help you out so it will make a little more sense. He will give you a formula that will give you the answer. I'm hungry so instead of continuing this I am going to dinner. You can have the last word now. Originally Posted by burkalini

I only used the article to show the risk of bbfs was more than that of oral sex, thus making the nuru massage more risky because of THE CUM INVOLVED! That is just like having freaking sex! Geez!!! I may not have been that great in math but obviously I got through it both in college and grad school. Now we are back to hooked on phonics!

Enjoy your dinner.

Look don't get to cute. I retired at 50, from a career that put me at risk of loosing my life every day for little shits like you. But whatever Burt's got or how little or how much, he got it clean. Originally Posted by acp5762

WHAT THE FUC EVER DUDE.

Your job did not put you at risk every day...

and btw, you think war and killing is clean money.

Everybody has a job to do to make this country run, some folks actually had to produce things to make it possible to pay your salary. I do not put any one job over the other....that includes soldiering vs fuc'n. Ain't one worth much without the other.

Gotta love WTF !

I only used the article to show the risk of bbfs was more than that of oral sex, thus making the nuru massage more risky because of THE CUM INVOLVED! That is just like having freaking sex! Geez!!! I may not have been that great in math but obviously I got through it both in college and grad school. Now we are back to hooked on phonics!

Enjoy your dinner. Originally Posted by London Rayne

But the difference is small. For example, if I said BBFS was twice as risky as BBJ that may sound high but if that difference was only one in million compared to two in a million then depending on how you word it can make it sound one way or the other.

I totally agree with your point about cum on the vegee vs no cum in the vejee.

Uhhh but exactly how would the girl know the guy did not cum? Stats show that sperm is present in semen even before a guy orgasms. You cannot argue that love. It's a double whammy if you ask me.

Uhhh but exactly how would the girl know the guy did not cum? Stats show that sperm is present in semen even before a guy orgasms. You cannot argue that love. It's a double whammy if you ask me. Originally Posted by Naomi4u

I love double whammy's !

WHAT THE FUC EVER DUDE.

Your job did not put you at risk every day...

and btw, you think war and killing is clean money.

Everybody has a job to do to make this country run, some folks actually had to produce things to make it possible to pay your salary. I do not put any one job over the other....that includes soldiering vs fuc'n. Ain't one worth much without the other. Originally Posted by WTF

You're not qualified to make the claim of whether or not my job put me in harms way every day or not. You don't know what my job description is.

You're not qualified to make the claim of whether or not my job put me in harms way every day or not. You don't know what my job description is. Originally Posted by acp5762

Everyone can get killed every single day.

Quit bragging about how you are protcting me and others from harms way.

WTF ever you do or did gives you no damn good reason to come on here and judge one's way of making money.

You do remember saying this don't you?

Look don't get to cute. I retired at 50, from a career that put me at risk of loosing my life every day for little shits like you. But whatever Burt's got or how little or how much, he got it clean. Originally Posted by acp5762

Who are you to judge wtf is clean or not?

Who are you to judge that your job is of more importance than anothers?

Quit judging lest ye not be judged. ...or something to that effect.