So Looks Like BRET KAVANAUGH May Have Raped A Girl In High School

We don't know that for sure...good possibility.
You haven't been on here long, but he's the VICTIM of everything and everyone!! Originally Posted by bb1961

Get back on topic NOW!!! ;-)

Naah Kav is going down. It would be like Trump to pick a fellow rapist / sexual assualter. It's a disgrace. Ask yourself this question. It's a rhetorical one. "When I was 18 how many girls did I attempt to rape by forcing myself on them and covering their mouth so no one could hear them scream? "

Think about that for a sec. Because it happened in 1982 does that make it more palatable. Powerful men all across this country are falling because of decades old aggressions and Kav unfortunately will have to pay the price mainly because he wants a lifetime appointment to tell other people how to live ...unfortunately when you have any blemish on your record while trying to tell others how to live then you must have lived a Jesus Christ type of life when it comes to how you've treated others.

I'm of the opinion you should never trust any guy that goes to all male institutions. Any woman with common sense should realize these are nothing but indoctrination camps. Where they're likely taught to hate woman and/or devalue them. Besides being a partisan hack and a semen shield for Trump Kav is not fit to serve for a lifetime appointment.

Every Murkowsky and Collins should listen to their constituents and vote no and if they dont vote no i would be very surprised.

This 4Q reveal is okay in my book. I'm very pleased that Diane Fienstein played this card at the last minute because Republicans have behaved this way with impunity for decades. Look at the Merrick Garland pick. Wouldn't even meet with him. Ram-roded Gorsuch through. Republican senators deal in bad faith daily so turn about is fair play.

Deal with it. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Still waiting on your rebuttal about all the "LIES"...I still like the 1801 "PIC"
So much for fact checking...
You said you would be back to explain your "LIES"...I see you're back but not to explain your lies...and you never will.
You're so mad about this soon to be confirmed judge that blood must be spewing out of all your orifices!!
Never seen you on such wild rant.
Don't want you to have a heart attack or stroke...just chill

you guys are barking over the wrong argument.. this has nothing to do with whether Kavanaugh and the Accuser were bottled up in a room at a party 35 years ago. nothing.

it has everything to do with Robert Bork, John Tower, Jim Wright, Anita Hill, and.. Merrick Garland.

follow the slow and steady destruction of Congress, beginning in 1987, when Jim Wright became Speaker of the House, replacing Tip O'Neill. Wright turned the attention to Iran-Contra, as soon as he was sworn in, and began the era of Congress vs. White House that has grown increasingly bitter the past 30 years.

this position that Kavanaugh and the Republicans find themselves today, was absolutely predictable.. if you didn't know that, you haven't been paying attention.

you guys are barking over the wrong argument.. this has nothing to do with whether Kavanaugh and the Accuser were bottled up in a room at a party 35 years ago. nothing.

it has everything to do with Robert Bork, John Tower, Jim Wright, Anita Hill, and.. Merrick Garland.

follow the slow and steady destruction of Congress, beginning in 1987, when Jim Wright became Speaker of the House, replacing Tip O'Neill. Wright turned the attention to Iran-Contra, as soon as he was sworn in, and began the era of Congress vs. White House that has grown increasingly bitter the past 30 years.

this position that Kavanaugh and the Republicans find themselves today, was absolutely predictable.. if you didn't know that, you haven't been paying attention. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

The attention I pay and the attention you pay...is entirely different.

The attention I pay and the attention you pay...is entirely different. Originally Posted by bb1961

care to elaborate? do you disagree with my post?

care to elaborate? do you disagree with my post? Originally Posted by Chung Tran

If the rolls were reversed we wouldn't hear anything but glee from you, SC, Yssup, or any other member who has issues the the conservative
ideology...just depends on who's ox is getting gored.

If the rolls were reversed we wouldn't hear a peep from you, SC, Yssup, or any other member who has issues the the conservative
ideology...nuff said!! Originally Posted by bb1961

I don’t think CT is a liberal. He’s just pointing out reality.

If the rolls were reversed we wouldn't hear anything but glee from you, SC, Yssup, or any other member who has issues the the conservative
ideology...just depends on who's ox is getting gored. Originally Posted by bb1961

The problem is that it's not at all conservative ideology. The majority of Republicans let that ship sail a while back.

Just look at the spending bill that REPUBLICANS passed after they passed a tax cut.

Tax cuts are not conservative when they cause the deficit to increase!

Finally The Democrats have struck gold. YAY!!! about fucking time.

Dude is going down. Trump the ever present sexual predator himself is nominating rapists to the Supreme court. What a dam shame.
Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Get back on topic NOW!!! ;-) Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Tax cuts are not conservative when they cause the deficit to increase! Originally Posted by grean

Neither is rape and being a sexual predator "conservative"!

But this thread has nothing to do with taxes.

I would label Sistine a "Mod," but that might be a rule violation based on a derogatory remark about him. So, I'll refrain from it.

We don't know that for sure...good possibility.
You haven't been on here long, but he's the VICTIM of everything and everyone!! Originally Posted by bb1961

Sometimes when someone is funny, it is not funny HA HA: it is funny something else.

un hu. We don't need to tote such hatred. Ruth Ginsburg, the ultra liberal Judge on the Supreme Court has stated that K should be openly endorsed by both parties because of his judicial qualifications.

I don’t think CT is a liberal. He’s just pointing out reality. Originally Posted by bambino

exactly!

The problem is that it's not at all conservative ideology. The majority of Republicans let that ship sail a while back. Originally Posted by grean

yes.. these people are not Conservative at all. I have literally never received a response to this question, of why they spend like mad, while condemning Liberals for excess spending? at least a liberal will try to justify himself.

If the rolls were reversed we wouldn't hear anything but glee from you, SC, Yssup, or any other member who has issues the the conservative
ideology...just depends on who's ox is getting gored. Originally Posted by bb1961

I outlined the history of how we got here, but the final and single reason is Merrick Garland.. tit-for-tat.. and you know it.

Naah Kav is going down. It would be like Trump to pick a fellow rapist / sexual assualter. It's a disgrace. Ask yourself this question. It's a rhetorical one. "When I was 18 how many girls did I attempt to rape by forcing myself on them and covering their mouth so no one could hear them scream? "

Think about that for a sec. Because it happened in 1982 does that make it more palatable. Powerful men all across this country are falling because of decades old aggressions and Kav unfortunately will have to pay the price mainly because he wants a lifetime appointment to tell other people how to live ...unfortunately when you have any blemish on your record while trying to tell others how to live then you must have lived a Jesus Christ type of life when it comes to how you've treated others.

I'm of the opinion you should never trust any guy that goes to all male institutions. Any woman with common sense should realize these are nothing but indoctrination camps. Where they're likely taught to hate woman and/or devalue them. Besides being a partisan hack and a semen shield for Trump Kav is not fit to serve for a lifetime appointment.

Every Murkowsky and Collins should listen to their constituents and vote no and if they dont vote no i would be very surprised.

This 4Q reveal is okay in my book. I'm very pleased that Diane Fienstein played this card at the last minute because Republicans have behaved this way with impunity for decades. Look at the Merrick Garland pick. Wouldn't even meet with him. Ram-roded Gorsuch through. Republican senators deal in bad faith daily so turn about is fair play.

Deal with it. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

That's a lot of writing with no credibility behind it. Ok so you don't want Kavanagh appointed to the Supreme Court, ok I get it. The problem is there's a burden of proof still at hand. It's not enough to just say something happened over three decades ago. These allegations are nothing more than a political maneuver. If Kavanagh wasn't in the position he's in to be nominated to the Supreme court this animated rape story never would have surfaced, because it wouldn't have any impact, because it didn't even happen. So deal with that.

Jim

That's a lot of writing with no credibility behind it. Ok so you don't want Kavanagh appointed to the Supreme Court, ok I get it. The problem is there's a burden of proof still at hand. It's not enough to just say something happened over three decades ago. These allegations are nothing more than a political maneuver. If Kavanagh wasn't in the position he's in to be nominated to the Supreme court this animated rape story never would have surfaced, because it wouldn't have any impact, because it didn't even happen. So deal with that.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

That's true. However, republicans in congress didn't seem to use the same standard with Clinton. His alleged crime was also very old. Maybe he raped her, maybe he didnt. There wasn't enough evidence presented to indict. Same thing will happen here with Kavanaugh more than likely.

Also, Sessions held Clinton over the fire for lack of candor when Sessions was in the Senate but then appeared to have issues with candor so much that he was forced to recuse himself as AG regrading Russia. I believe Kavanaugh has fallen into the same issue with the truth, albeit an immaterial email or something, no?

I'm just saying it's all a circus and everyone's a clown.

so you don't want Kavanagh appointed to the Supreme Court, ok I get it. The problem is there's a burden of proof still at hand. Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

you know what? there's no burden of proof at all. the Members can vote down Kavanaugh for having an eyebrow hair out of line. this is strictly a tit-for-tat Hearing at this point. sure, they will continue the Dog-and-Pony show, because it is required, but out of 100 Senators, there are 100 that know exactly the game that is being played, and it is exactly how I outlined earlier.

I wonder if he at least had the decency to tell her she'd better put some ice on that or may be when it was over something like, need a ride home?