Homemade flour tortillas, too.
What's up GeniusMan/ Do you have a scam that lets you get discounts you don't reflect in your reviews?
- Carl
- 02-13-2011, 12:42 AM
My menudo sure is tasting pretty fucking good.
Homemade flour tortillas, too.
Homemade flour tortillas, too.
- Spacemtn
- 02-13-2011, 01:09 AM
Ok, since GMan apparently has no interest in responding to the question posed in the title of this thread and since it is so far from the original topic, I am gonna close this mess before I loose any more sleep over this nonsense.
It seems that many of the posters here have been misunderstood, misquoted, and "attacked". So let's see if we can clear up a few points:
The allegations against GMan were originally leveled by a provider in another coed thread.
When people refer to "hearing about something behind the scenes" it does not mean that they have access to an area that they are not suppossed to. It could mean that someone or several someones told them at lunch, over a cocktail, in an e mail, PM, or during pillow talk confirmed something that might heretofore been only speculated about. It does not mean that there is a breach of a private area necessarily. Understand, private area breaches are taken seriously here so if we believe it is happening and can prove it, there are always consequences.
I don't get angry and I don't take things said here personally unless they become personal. I can state unequivocably that I don't take favors from anyone here and there were Mods in the past that did (or at least tried). I was told this by one of them so either he did or he wanted me to believe he did. This not withstanding I have zero tolerance for disrespect for the VOLUNTEER Staff members here, period.
Disagreement is not necessarily disrespect.
Name calling has to go beyond "girlie" for it to be actionable IMHO. We are all grown and our skins should be a little thicker than that.
When you question something, or someone, or someone's actions, that is not necessarily an attack. Questioning things is ingrained in our American culture. It is why we are Americans. It is only an attack when it becomes personal. In this case, the question seemed to be the accuracy of the reviews and the amounts allegedly paid for the companionship. In order to stay on track, let me give my .02! Very few of the ladies seen by GMan have only his one review. Most of them have pages of them so his reviews, in most if not all cases, aren't going to influence a "newby" to make a bad decision as there are many reviews for them to peruse. Does this information that has come to light about him make some if not all of us question the veracity of his writings, of course. In the big picture, is it really a big factor, not from my POV, but others have stated that the disagree with that and that is all good and fine. That's what keeps things interesting. I daresay that many of the reviews here contain some inaccuracy or another that we could find if we really looked for them.
Enough on this topic. It is worn out. Find something new to talk about or debate.
Spacemtn
AustinModstaff
It seems that many of the posters here have been misunderstood, misquoted, and "attacked". So let's see if we can clear up a few points:
The allegations against GMan were originally leveled by a provider in another coed thread.
When people refer to "hearing about something behind the scenes" it does not mean that they have access to an area that they are not suppossed to. It could mean that someone or several someones told them at lunch, over a cocktail, in an e mail, PM, or during pillow talk confirmed something that might heretofore been only speculated about. It does not mean that there is a breach of a private area necessarily. Understand, private area breaches are taken seriously here so if we believe it is happening and can prove it, there are always consequences.
I don't get angry and I don't take things said here personally unless they become personal. I can state unequivocably that I don't take favors from anyone here and there were Mods in the past that did (or at least tried). I was told this by one of them so either he did or he wanted me to believe he did. This not withstanding I have zero tolerance for disrespect for the VOLUNTEER Staff members here, period.
Disagreement is not necessarily disrespect.
Name calling has to go beyond "girlie" for it to be actionable IMHO. We are all grown and our skins should be a little thicker than that.
When you question something, or someone, or someone's actions, that is not necessarily an attack. Questioning things is ingrained in our American culture. It is why we are Americans. It is only an attack when it becomes personal. In this case, the question seemed to be the accuracy of the reviews and the amounts allegedly paid for the companionship. In order to stay on track, let me give my .02! Very few of the ladies seen by GMan have only his one review. Most of them have pages of them so his reviews, in most if not all cases, aren't going to influence a "newby" to make a bad decision as there are many reviews for them to peruse. Does this information that has come to light about him make some if not all of us question the veracity of his writings, of course. In the big picture, is it really a big factor, not from my POV, but others have stated that the disagree with that and that is all good and fine. That's what keeps things interesting. I daresay that many of the reviews here contain some inaccuracy or another that we could find if we really looked for them.
Enough on this topic. It is worn out. Find something new to talk about or debate.
Spacemtn
AustinModstaff