Close This Thread

Ya know, if you actually analyze that statement, the suggestion that she somehow has private access doesn't really hold up. Originally Posted by Doove

been covered

if you go back to original thrAD

and "analyze" my post without PA

without PA there would be no way to know theres PA in the post

try and keep up please doove

My statement isn't out of line with countless threads indicating we are nuts, misguided, insane, and/or derelict to simply be on these pages. Originally Posted by JohnnyCap

Removing the fact that your comment was directed at a narrower sub-set of hobbyists, of which you conveniently don't include yourself, yeah, it's pretty much the same thing.

been covered

if you go back to original thrAD

and "analyze" my post without PA

without PA there would be no way to know theres PA in the post

try and keep up please doove Originally Posted by JONBALLS

Fair point. So tell us then, just how many times are you going to bring this up?

And let me ask, can we then assume you've never received info from either the powder room......or for that matter, the men's lounge at a time when you didn't have premium access? Or the ROS?

And you never availed yourself of "the site"?

here

http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...5&postcount=95

Fair point. So tell us then, just how many times are you going to bring this up? Originally Posted by Doove

as many times as YOU bring it up
you brought up the point

hard time dealing with some actual facts?

And let me ask, can we then assume you've never received info from either the powder room......or for that matter, the men's lounge at a time when you didn't have premium access? Or the ROS?? Originally Posted by Doove

find my quote

as many times as YOU bring it up Originally Posted by JONBALLS

Guess i've got some catching up to do.

you brought up the point

And if by "brought it up", you mean "quoted your post to address it", then yeah, i brought it up.

hard time dealimg with some actual facts?

Need help with your math, do ya?

find my quote Originally Posted by JONBALLS

Nice non-response. Why not just plead the 5th? It's about as effective.

alright , since i have to continueally run in circles because when you have nothing left you need to pull the ole liberal diversionary tactics out..lol

here http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=861874


10-02-2013, 05:57 AM #7 JONBALLS
Valued Poster



Join Date: Mar 8, 2011
Location: upset ny
Posts: 7,709
Reviews: 15



i would expect that response

thats why i say this area is trending towards allowing the women into the mens lounge

is kinda a weird quirky subservient attitude

or someone needs to get laid really cheap

excetera and so on....multitude of agendas

however yah want to pass it off is totally exceptable "opinion"

all by passing the fact it was a cut and dry situation

is what it is , so lets get rid of the area is just my humble suggestion

as far as me, i wont be needing pa anymore

all my view points will be submitted to the ladies directly on the open forums

merge it if were not gonna enforce the obvious or the masses are in agreement

looking back DH actually was her best friend if she took the advice

Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
.......THERE ARE ALWAYS TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY!!!!!

VL nudged the door open here as to her being the hooktard in question

Quote:
Originally Posted by jokacz
Three sides to every story.
Don't forget the truth.

jkz nudged the door back closed here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
LOL Jokacz.
Very true. But in this case the story basically only had two sides.

VL kicked the door open here........so, she has no one to blame but herself for her exposure in this.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
Ok GBOF you want to out my name? .........

VL attempts to blame GBOF for her own potty mouth......must be some of those excellent communication skills.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Victoria Lane
......Jonballs......this has NOTHING to do with you, ..........why are you writting in private so I can't respond to it and defend myself? .............

How would VL know whether JB did or did not post anything in "private"? The act of acknowledging that you have access to board communication that you should not have is a violation that carries a ban as the consequence.

When a hooktard/fucktard acknowledges by statement or response to said private commentary that they know that information, they are in violation of Guideline #20. As a fucktard/hooktard does not have access to the area (Powder Room, InfoShare, Men's Lounge, ROS & "Private Tags") where the normal assessed penalty is a loss of access, it has been determined by modtardville that they will lose access to the area where they posted the violation (ie. the general board). The penalty for this infraction is typically determined by the attitude of the offender. If the offender is forthcoming with the retard who gave them the information (and that retard acknowledges his/her participation), they both share a short vacation of a few days. If the fucktard/hooktard tells the modtard investigating to fuck off, the punishment goes up from there.

ijs
__________________
I reckon if I were to want a free one, it would be with you.
I am the Fucking prophet........where is my chariot of fire?
Come join my manposse fan club.....everyone gets a hooktard when they join.
Everything I say here is straight out of middle earth.
Don't point me Bro.....
The best review ever http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=37228
"How can we miss you when you don't EVER leave?"
I am a better fuck than her....with a poll to prove it.
If you are not the cat, you are the mouse...I'm just saying.
| 1 user liked this post

This thread is like striking out with Option A..........


....makes me wanna forget pussy, and go get a steak and a beer.............







elg........

alright , since i have to continueally run in circles because when you have nothing left you need to pull the ole liberal diversionary tactics out..lol Originally Posted by JONBALLS

And when you have nothing left, you just throw out the word "liberal".

i would expect that response

thats why i say this area is trending towards allowing the women into the mens lounge

is kinda a weird quirky subservient attitude

or someone needs to get laid really cheap

excetera and so on....multitude of agendas

however yah want to pass it off is totally exceptable "opinion"

all by passing the fact it was a cut and dry situation

is what it is , so lets get rid of the area is just my humble suggestion

as far as me, i wont be needing pa anymore

all my view points will be submitted to the ladies directly on the open forums

I'm not gonna try to interpret that nonsense. All i know is i checked it 2 or 3 times and didn't see a "yes" or a "no".

One more chance.....ever received info that the rules of the board forbade you to have?

Edit: And i suppose it was i who "brought up" post # 161.

EditII: And by the way, you getting your panties in a wad over a rule being broken is pretty dang funny.

simple acknowlegement meant only a simple couple of day ban

prolly didnt even have to "rat out" anyone

bam ......couple days has passsed by MANY and this issue would have ben done and gone

she would have come back hailed a hero and bad ass rule breaker...sales through the roof..


but now .........................bad news never gets better with time

EditII: And by the way, you getting your panties in a wad over a rule being broken is pretty dang funny. Originally Posted by Doove

It's kinda like listening to GP bitching about people giving the mods a hard time.