What does it mean if she read it, printed it and then wiped her ass with it? Originally Posted by jerkyBasically, nothing except I'll still be in her head. And it would appear I'm still in your head. Get over it already.
Clear exampleof how slow people hear what they want to hear... Originally Posted by Italia DiBellaAt first I couldn't figure out why you seem so butt hurt (other than your normal occupational hazard), then I looked back and saw I mistakenly said you were giving up the BBFS for free.
At first I couldn't figure out why you seem so butt hurt (other than your normal occupational hazard), then I looked back and saw I mistakenly said you were giving up the BBFS for free.Obviously your the butt hurt one.
My mistake, and I stand corrected. You are evidently placing a premium upsell for the BBFS as evidenced by:
Old standard over the hill hooker ad at 180/hour https://m.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1973628&highlight=
The new "I love vaginal/anal creampies" ad at 350/hour https://m.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1980150
I thought you whores had a saying that goes something like "Not all money is good money"? You must have skipped class that day during "How To Be A Whore 101" Originally Posted by citizen44
^ there's no difference in what you posted vs. what Italia D did.
Yes, she does deserve credit for being honest about it, yes. She also deserves a little credit for jumping into the cockfight ring (here). Originally Posted by TryWeakly
^ there's no difference in what you posted vs. what ItaliaAnd your point is...?
**Edit correction** - unless you're on some of that cute papi shit Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel
I previously laid out risk metrics (in terms of HIV). ~98% condom effectiveness is typically reduced in the real world to ~82% effectiveness due to improper use. PReP gives you a 92% surface area reduction. Assuming your not using PReP then you're at about a 20% risk (+ or - 3% with each condom use. Originally Posted by Sistine ChapelWhere your analysis fails is at the fact that you think stats end at sinle event risk. It's the cumulative probability that will get them.
And your point is...?I only WK for freedom of thought and expression. One of my musical mentors (no I dont know him) Andre Benjamin from the group Outkast once said: " Not everyone with dreads is for the cause and not everyone with gold is for the fall so don't get caught up in appearance its Outkast Aquemini another black experience."
I see Italia got herself a new WK . My beef isnt Italia. My bbeef is....nevermind.. you seem incapable of reading with an open mind, too.
I guess its time for you to man up and take that bet I offered you. Then you'll shut the fuck up about mandles.
Get some new material.
And dafuq is "cute papi shit" mean? Originally Posted by TryWeakly
Where your analysis fails is at the fact that you think stats end at sinle event risk. It's the cumulative probability that will get them. Originally Posted by citizen44You are flat out wrong. Go back reread my original point on this topic to Milfy. I originally indicated the cumulative risk factor. Fact is yall dont read because you erroneously think you're smarter than me. Lol jk
So what your clearly saying, is that we can add you to the Houstons Don's list (ie The Typhoid Mary list)? Three posts and no denials. Awesome. Originally Posted by citizen44I'm against to post or getting involved in this type of discussions, I would only like to say one thing, I have seen Italian on several occasions probably 5 or 6 every session was CFS with the exception of bbbj, she never mentioned or suggested bbfs,
I only WK for freedom of thought and expression. One of my musical mentors (no I dont know him) Andre Benjamin from the group Outkast once said: " Not everyone with dreads is for the cause and not everyone with gold is for the fall so don't get caught up in appearance its Outkast Aquemini another black experience."I'm sorry Miss Jackson.
In other words dont get the wrong impression of expression. ;-) Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel