James Clapper on meet the press stated their report found no collusion between Trump associates and Russia.
Also there was no FISA warrant. Originally Posted by wordup666
Gullible Mike AKA "eeehhbbbuhrrrr" your stupidity is astonishing...
![Rm Frog](images/smilies/modern/rm_frog.gif)
LL, I really couldn't give a fuck less about Clinton so I'm not sure why you keep bringing that up. In the election there were two turds to pick from as far as I was concerned. Originally Posted by JCM800Oh if you do not like Trump , according to LexusLiar you must be for Clinton.
James ClapperClapper wouldn't necessarily know if there was or was not a FISA warrant application or one issued. Domestic FISA warrants are obtained by the FBI. If it wasn't, then that would DEMAND an investigation to determine why SOP wasn't followed when a political candidate is the object of an eavesdropping investigation.
Also there was no FISA warrant. Originally Posted by wordup666
Clapper wouldn't necessarily know if there was or was not a FISA warrant application or one issued. Domestic FISA warrants are obtained by the FBI. If it wasn't, then that would DEMAND an investigation to determine why SOP wasn't followed when a political candidate is the object of an eavesdropping investigation.
Clapper should keep quiet. Originally Posted by LexusLover
Gullible Mike AKA "eeehhbbbuhrrrr" your stupidity is astonishing...
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
Clapper wouldn't necessarily know if there was or was not a FISA warrant application or one issued. Domestic FISA warrants are obtained by the FBI. If it wasn't, then that would DEMAND an investigation to determine why SOP wasn't followed when a political candidate is the object of an eavesdropping investigation.http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/05/politi...tap/index.html
Clapper should keep quiet.
Here's why: If there was no warrant for the eavesdropping on the conversations that Trump and his TRANSITION staff were having with the Russians then who ever was listening in on those conversations were not parties to the conversations and they are in violation of Federal felonies (one or more) and should be prosecuted ... and if no one was actually listening in on those conversations just how the fuck does "Clapper" know what was or was not discussed by Trump and/or his TRANSITION staff with the Russians?
These little bullshit discussions come back to bite him! Originally Posted by LexusLover
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/05/politi...tap/index.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/james...igation-2017-3
He probably knows more than you two. Originally Posted by bamscram
http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/05/politi...tap/index.html
http://www.businessinsider.com/james...igation-2017-3
He probably knows more than you two. Originally Posted by bamscram
My guess is that an easy way to get the focus off all the current Russian news out there surrounding the Trump team is to put out a story out like this. They know that all the Trump supporters will buy into it even without a shred of evidence that it's actually true ...and all because Trump tweeted about it, right? ...so it must be true.Umm, your bias is showing... how is someone else's acceptance of the wiretap accusation "without a shred of evidence" any worse than your embrace of the Trump-Russia collusion accusation for which there is no evidence in sight?Originally Posted by JCM800
Hey I understand ...a report of Russian interference in the election is fake and a report of a wiretap in the Trump Tower is legit ...I see how it works. Originally Posted by JCM800Except in your case, it only works if you flip them around, right?
Umm, your bias is showing... how is someone else's acceptance of the wiretap accusation "without a shred of evidence" any worse than your embrace of the Trump-Russia collusion accusation for which there is no evidence in sight: Originally Posted by lustyladNo evidence...