For those who need proof of election fraud....

Anyway, how would you refute Speedracer's argument, which makes a lot of sense to me?

If I vote by mail, I request a ballot which is mailed to me with a code on it. I fill it out, sign it, and return it and it is then checked by 2 indviduals from each party for signature accuracy. If the 2 individuals disagree, a 3rd person comes in and checks it. If they still believe their is a possible problem they have they can get in contact with me to verify I am who I say I am. As shown in the past in states that allow mail-in voting, the cases of fraud are ridiculously low.

Very easily, his claim is patently false. That’s not how it worked in many places this time, and it only takes a few highly populated dem areas to tip the scales.

Example: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/1...natures-431794

You're qualifying again. "Illegal votes", we know that some legal votes got switched by a machine because someone who is not supposed to have access "accidentally" made it happen. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Proof???

Proof??? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...bs-runs-video/

Proof??? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Proof is out there. But the lsm/libs have suppressed it.

Proof??? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

https://worthypolitics.com/huge-news...he-2020-elect/

this would require election official collusion on this. the atlanta video (ballot boxes being pulled out of a covered table after observers left) showed that this was certainly possible.
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

The counting of ballots was stopped and uncounted ballots were put in boxes/suitcases until counting was to resume. When counting resumed the boxes were pulled out and counting began again. Another "conspiracy theory" debunked.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...xt/3892640001/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/joewals...h=3a7d5da7e5a4

https://factcheck.afp.com/georgia-vi...election-fraud

Very easily, his claim is patently false. That’s not how it worked in many places this time, and it only takes a few highly populated dem areas to tip the scales.

Example: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/1...natures-431794 Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

The ruling in Pennsylvania agrees with what I stated. No vote will be thrown out based solely on a signature mismatch. In Texas, if a final decision as to the accuracy of the ballot can't be reached by 3 people inspecting the ballot, the voter can be contacted in order to verify the vote. However, I did some additional research on this subject and found that the process does not always work that way and some voters are told of the signature mismarch AFTER the election.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...bs-runs-video/ Originally Posted by bambino

No proof there. And again with The Gateway Pundit??? Give me a break.

No proof there. And again with The Gateway Pundit??? Give me a break. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

From a guy who believes Snopes. Give me a break.


https://independentstream.com/snopes...-george-soros/

NCSWIC

From a guy who believes Snopes. Give me a break.


https://independentstream.com/snopes...-george-soros/

NCSWIC Originally Posted by bambino

I look at the methodology used by Snopes and their conclusions and make a decision as to whether or not their conclusions are based on FACT. You should do the same with your sources.

That article you just cited is basaed on the opinion of one person with no facts to back it up. Just reading it shows a level of bias found only in far-left or far-right sources.

Snopes media bias rating is Center.

Snopes has a Center bias, though perhaps close to Lean Left.

AllSides conducted an editorial review of Snopes on June 2, 2020. We concluded that Snopes warrants a Center rating, though most on the team acknowledged that Snopes may have a slight Lean Left bias.

AllSides noted that Snopes doesn't craft headlines as "gotcha!" phrases like other fact checkers do, but instead always poses headlines as a question, which is a more neutral way of addressing claims.

The AllSides team was impressed that Snopes does not label claims in a binary of "true" and "false," but acknowledges nuance and complexity by having a number of labels for its claims, including "mostly true," "miscaptioned," "outdated," "unproven," and others.

Some noted Snopes seems to fact-check right-wing claims a bit more than left-wing claims. Others noted elite bias — a type of ideological bias — in Snopes' fact checking. Snopes seems to stand by people, not values, and will come to the rescue of the elite class more often than falling on the side of populist concerns and claims. Snopes also seems to fact check falsehoods more often than claims that turn out to be true.

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/snopes

TLGOI

The ruling in Pennsylvania agrees with what I stated. No vote will be thrown out based solely on a signature mismatch. In Texas, if a final decision as to the accuracy of the ballot can't be reached by 3 people inspecting the ballot, the voter can be contacted in order to verify the vote. However, I did some additional research on this subject and found that the process does not always work that way and some voters are told of the signature mismarch AFTER the election. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Dude, what are you smoking? Sorry but your claims that ballots were verified is BS, or simply ignorance. I’d suspect the later. They made no effort to match signatures AT ALL. Dems wanted that safeguard eliminated and the wackjob SCOPA let it happen, unconstitutionally and without legislation.

Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar (D) issued guidance to counties that local election officials cannot perform on-the-spot signature analysis.
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-electio...rs-signatures/

Insanity is failing to understand where there's smoke there's fire

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/desk



NCSWIC

probably the greatest non quitter in the history of the country

donald j. trump

he will not be pushed around personally

nor did he allow america to be