Champagne Brown Banned

On the basis that we are all insane to varying degrees, if you choose to relentlessly provoke another member, it's possible that you could trigger a kamikaze state. Originally Posted by Sarunga

So you've met Cassandra?

Old Dingus

Actually, I think Wakeup rather clever in his snarky way. and agree he is being nicer about this than I (or most) would.

There's some other guy around here who thinks he's as clever as wake up, but every time that guy posts, I envision a nasty little bitter troll living under a bridge. Anyone want to guess who? Let's make it a game! I'm trying to think of a good prize... Originally Posted by LilMynx69

I wouldn't necessarily call him a troll, but otherwise, you got Boardman pegged. ijs

I love it when people shirk responsibility of their own behavior, by blaming it on the behavior of others. Very not grown up, which is what I thought we are all supposed to be. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

+1

Nicely said, Daphne! I agree 100%.

My mantra is "I never let someone else's bad behavior change the person I know I am."

If she did out someone, she deserves her fate. Originally Posted by blowpop

+1

Ignorant = Childish

Your the one who wanted to play in the big game, so who did I "out"? Originally Posted by Wakeuр

Yourself.

I love it when people shirk responsibility of their own behavior, by blaming it on the behavior of others. Very not grown up, which is what I thought we are all supposed to be. Originally Posted by Luxury Daphne

Apples = Oranges.

Huh?

Wait, if Wu outed himself, would he get banned too? that would be way cool

course in a way he did out himself... a name was posted, and until someone owned up to it being theirs, it was a name from thin air.

WU said it was his.. thus completing the circle of "Outing"

had he not said a thing or comment on the post (which is impossible for WU to do) there would be this name... with no-one claiming it to be theirs and CB would have to reveal more info which I doubt she had.


No, WU decided to say it was his, and it was believed.. so now we all know his first name... (those of us who saw the posts)

WU took the bait, hook(er) line and sinker

Wait, if Wu outed himself, would he get banned too? that would be way cool

course in a way he did out himself... a name was posted, and until someone owned up to it being theirs, it was a name from thin air.

WU said it was his.. thus completing the circle of "Outing"

had he not said a thing or comment on the post (which is impossible for WU to do) there would be this name... with no-one claiming it to be theirs and CB would have to reveal more info which I doubt she had.


No, WU decided to say it was his, and it was believed.. so now we all know his first name... (those of us who saw the posts)

WU took the bait, hook(er) line and sinker Originally Posted by Mr. GPop

CB (not to be confused with cb, or CDB) quoted WU in that post. Only the willfully obtuse would not have gathered the name she posted was his.

CB (not to be confused with cb, or CDB) quoted WU in that post. Only the willfully obtuse would not have gathered the name she posted was his. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

who else can verify what she post was what WU said?


I guess my point which I have tried to make easy to see is, how do we know what she posted was the truth? Unless someone ELSE verifies it, its Wu's word against hers.... and oddly enough because of his rep and general way he is on here, I would trust her over him

No-one here has come out and said that what she posted (both name and the quote) is WU.


I am sure you understand what is called "Credible"...and I am damn sure everyone on here would like to think that if they were accused of something.... the accusers would have proof positive that they did what they did and not take the word of someone, no matter how much they trust them.

who else can verify what she post was what WU said?


I guess my point which I have tried to make easy to see is, how do we know what she posted was the truth? Unless someone ELSE verifies it, its Wu's word against hers.... and oddly enough because of his rep and general way he is on here, I would trust her over him

No-one here has come out and said that what she posted (both name and the quote) is WU.


I am sure you understand what is called "Credible"...and I am damn sure everyone on here would like to think that if they were accused of something.... the accusers would have proof positive that they did what they did and not take the word of someone, no matter how much they trust them. Originally Posted by Mr. GPop

If I quote your comment like this and then refer to you in my reply with your real name and direct the reply to you and your quoted comment would you agree that is a form of outing? That's what she did plain and simple. Regardless of who she did it to it was wrong and she knew it. Whether you like wakeup or not does not matter because what she did was wrong and violated board policy.

He still thinks it wasn't my name...:snicker:

He still thinks it wasn't my name...:snicker: Originally Posted by Wakeuр

prove me wrong with legal documentation that says it is.

Put up or SHUT UP

If I quote your comment like this and then refer to you in my reply with your real name and direct the reply to you and your quoted comment would you agree that is a form of outing? That's what she did plain and simple. Regardless of who she did it to it was wrong and she knew it. Whether you like wakeup or not does not matter because what she did was wrong and violated board policy. Originally Posted by poppy71

Quoting someone and adding their 1st name to the quoted message is not really outing someone.. I mean a first name of say... Larry -- how can you like it to anyone without a last name or other corroborating information.. its just "larry"

WU doesn't need to document anything, because it really doesn't matter whether the name CB posted is his real name, or not. The mods have told us that she posted what she - and the mods and other members who know WU - understood to be his real name. If it is not, in fact, his real name, and she got her cunt banned for a failed outing, that would be both well-deserved and really funny.

Quoting someone and adding their 1st name to the quoted message is not really outing someone.. I mean a first name of say... Larry -- how can you like it to anyone without a last name or other corroborating information.. its just "larry" Originally Posted by Mr. GPop

Ok this is where we disagree. If I wanted to be known here by my first name then it would be my handle. If a provider knows my real name and refers to me by it on here then we would have a problem.