GM's lineup includes a 27k model. While hardly any car manufacturers cater to the poor other than maybe Tata in India....27k is not for the wealthy
Originally Posted by WTF
You're referring to the Bolt in its most stripped-down "econobox," rolling-tin-can-style trim.
But that's not going to be good enough to appeal to lower-income households (even with the tax credit), for the following reasons:
First, the $27,000 price is still about 50% higher than similarly-sized gasoline-powered, stripped-down econoboxes.
Second, most lower-income families don't have the luxury of having a range-bound car that they can't take on a trip to visit the parents or grandparents over the holidays, or to the beach for an occasional summer getaway.
Additionally, most lower-income families couldn't care less about virtue-signaling, which is generally the province of upper-income urban and suburban professionals.
In the more affluent areas of Dallas, for instance, you can hardly swing a cowboy's lariat without hitting a Tesla. Typical owners can assuage their guilt about cranking the air conditioning to 70 degrees in their 8,000 sq. ft. home on a beastly hot summer day. Sort of like "Mine-Me" versions of Al Gore, when he "offsets" the emissions output of the chartered jets he flies around in by obtaining "carbon credits."
To be sure, electric cars have some very attractive features. The incredible smoothness, for one thing. The absence of having to stop at crowded urban gas stations to fill up. And, of course, the thrill of wickedly-quick acceleration (2.0 sec 0-60 mph!) in a 1,020-horsepower Model S Plaid. In a one-eighth-mile drag race, it will shut the doors off anything else you can drive on the street.