Hey Uneducated Deplorables, Trumps End Is Near You Suckers!

If the Pro-Trumpers retain control of the Senate it will be a win for Trump!

Irrespective of their respective party affiliation.

How many Senate votes does it take to kick him out of office?

"As long as I campaign and/or support Senate and House candidates (within reason), they will win! I LOVE the people, & they certainly seem to like the job I’m doing. If I find the time, in between China, Iran, the Economy and much more, which I must, we will have a giant Red Wave!"


http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...andidates.html Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

"If I find the time, ...."

Strike 2! That's a "conditional" statement not a "will be"!!!!

The ploy of asserting Trump predicted there "will be" a Red Wave is merely another example of anti-Trumpers watering down a failure of the Anti-Trumpers to take over both houses of Congress as they have boldly predicted for months! It's the same tactic as claiming a "victory" against Trump because a primary or special election win for his approved candidate was "thin" or by a "lesser" % than the results Trump got in the 2016 election for that particular voting area.

It's just another attempt to marginalize Trump. Week at best.

In reality lame.

"If I find the time, ...."

Strike 2! That's a "conditional" statement not a "will be"!!!!

The ploy of asserting Trump predicted there "will be" a Red Wave is merely another example of anti-Trumpers watering down a failure of the Anti-Trumpers to take over both houses of Congress as they have boldly predicted for months! It's the same tactic as claiming a "victory" against Trump because a primary or special election win for his approved candidate was "thin" or by a "lesser" % than the results Trump got in the 2016 election for that particular voting area.

It's just another attempt to marginalize Trump. Week at best.

In reality lame. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I had already edited my prior post before I saw your latest post. Please re-read.

If the Pro-Trumpers retain control of the Senate it will be a win for Trump!

Irrespective of their respective party affiliation.

How many Senate votes does it take to kick him out of office? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I have not read one person predicting Democrats taking control of the Senate. Not impossible for Democrats but close to it.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...umbents-646183

Everyone is entitled to an opinion. But even if they’re unrelated to the discussion? Or a desperate attempt to deflect, dodge, duck or otherwise drive the conversation in another direction?

Like;

“I like creamy peanut butter, so Trump’s a cunt.”

Or

“ICE is not abusing immigrant families. Just look at Sweden.”

Or

“That’s what the media wants you to believe. Lock her up!”

For a change, you’re ranting, TWacoK. Every opinion matters, of course, but it’s plain to see that you believe those who can’t hang with the new rules, shoild simply filibuster. Noted.

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Everyone is entitled to an opinion. even if they’re unrelated to the discussion. but it doesn't make it a desperate attempt to deflect, dodge, duck or otherwise drive the conversation in another direction.

Like;

“I like creamy peanut butter, so Clinton’s a cunt.”

Or

“ICE is not abusing immigrant families. Just look at Obama.”

Or

“That’s what the media wants you to believe. Lock her up anyway!”

Every opinion matters, of course, but it’s plain to see that I believe those who can’t hang with the new rules, should simply filibuster. Noted.


i like filibusters.

Apparently you agree with me, TWK. Thanks for admitting it.

Huzzah!

I have not read one person predicting Democrats taking control of the Senate. Not impossible for Democrats but close to it. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

An indictment is nothing without a jury to convict.

But all this "impeachment" screaming is not helping the Democrats.

It has the same effect as calling Trump supporters a ...

... "basket of deplorables"!

Do the screamers want Pence? On topic: A bit of history!

10-20-2016, 08:03 AM #21
SpeedRacerXXX


This election is OVER. Republicans should start focusing on 2020. Unless a bomb hits between now and November 8th there is no way Trump can overcome the lead that Clinton has in the polls. For those of you who are still not believing the polls . . . we'll see in a handful of days how accurate they are.

Let's see how the vote goes on approving the eminently qualified judge for SCOTUS coming up. As opposed to lame-stream media wishful spewing.

I have not read one person predicting Democrats taking control of the Senate. Not impossible for Democrats but close to it.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/...umbents-646183 Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

exactly. the Dems know well even if they take back the House they can all yell "PEACH 45" all they want it would be the Senate that votes.

now get this partisans .. most Democrats will NOT vote to impeach Trump if it isn't a Russia collusion matter. after 20 years if Saint Mueller finds some violation the IRS didn't means nothing. it's not impeach worthy and many Democrats know it.

they know like Rahm Emanuel does that if you impeach a President just because you simply don't like him then there's gonna be a day when the other party is going to do the same to you.

does any on the left want to state that if Obama was president and the Republicans had both houses as they do now that they'd be screaming "PEACH 44" over nothing more than a bunch of fabricated mularky based on the Steele dossier? Please!


we all know .... that the Republicans wouldn't even try it. PERIOD!

with what WE ALL KNOW NOW about the "transparent" Obama Admin which we all know now was worse than Nixon at hiding things! and that's sayin' something. If enough of what Obama was doing at the time he did it then Obama should have been impeached. Moot point now.

Trump will not get impeached even if the Democrats do get their "blue wave" and regain complete control. the majority of Democratic senators aren't going to stick their political asses out and impeach Trump without clear and direct evidence of collusion with Russia PERIOD!

hahahahahahaa

Apparently you agree with me, TWK. Thanks for admitting it.

Huzzah! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Apparently I disagree with you, YR. Thanks for admitting it.

excelsior!

exactly. the Dems know well even if they take back the House they can all yell "PEACH 45" all they want it would be the Senate that votes.

now get this partisans .. most Democrats will NOT vote to impeach Trump if it isn't a Russia collusion matter. after 20 years if Saint Mueller finds some violation the IRS didn't means nothing. it's not impeach worthy and many Democrats know it.

they know like Rahm Emanuel does that if you impeach a President just because you simply don't like him then there's gonna be a day when the other party is going to do the same to you.

does any on the left want to state that if Obama was president and the Republicans had both houses as they do now that they'd be screaming "PEACH 44" over nothing more than a bunch of fabricated mularky based on the Steele dossier? Please!


we all know .... that the Republicans wouldn't even try it. PERIOD!

with what WE ALL KNOW NOW about the "transparent" Obama Admin which we all know now was worse than Nixon at hiding things! and that's sayin' something. If enough of what Obama was doing at the time he did it then Obama should have been impeached. Moot point now.

Trump will not get impeached even if the Democrats do get their "blue wave" and regain complete control. the majority of Democratic senators aren't going to stick their political asses out and impeach Trump without clear and direct evidence of collusion with Russia PERIOD!

hahahahahahaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

and it takes 67 votes 2/3's right

What Aboutism

and it takes 67 votes 2/3's right Originally Posted by Hotrod511

says here ...


How Many Votes Does It Take to Impeach a President?

A: Quick Answer

A simple majority of the House of Representatives (at least 218 votes) is required to impeach a U.S. President followed by a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate (at least 67 votes).


https://www.reference.com/government...8fabbe9a3b6c64


i'm gonna go out on limb here that this isn't FAKE NEWS!

hahahaa

What Aboutism Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

AboutWhatism?

and it takes 67 votes 2/3's right Originally Posted by Hotrod511

It's too bad Maxine can't read and her staff can't either.

https://www.senate.gov/reference/res...pdf/98-806.pdf

When the President of the United States is
tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: and no Person shall be convicted without Concurrence of two-thirds of the Members present.

Pretty sure I disagree with The_Waco_Kid on just about everything politically.
However, I like the arguements, facts, and way you present everything, without always resulting to name calling. Makes me realize that Trumpism isn't just a cult like following, and there's intelligent people on both sides